NASB (1995 Edition) versus NASB (Current Edition)

[JesusFan]

Based on your powers of reasoning I suspect.

No, based upon the truth that many churches who liked using the Nov 1984 rejected using 2011 and the teaching curriculum that came with it!

 

[JesusFan]

I find myself using (and liking) the ESV more and more, by the way.

My 2 go to sb in that translation are the Esv SB and the Reformation one!

 

[alexander284]

My 2 go to sb in that translation are the Esv SB and the Reformation one!

I do not have the ESV Reformation Study Bible (although I once had it in the NKJV, which I gave to a friend who primarily uses the NKJV).

The ESV Study Bible, on the hand, I do have. And what an incredible resource it is! Highly recommended, as we say.

 

[alexander284]

No, based upon the truth that many churches who liked using the Nov 1984 rejected using 2011 and the teaching curriculum that came with it!

Yes, I believe the NIV (2011) got a little carried away in what they did. And that why I prefer the CSB.

 

[alexander284]

On the other hand, I'm finding the NASB (2020) does a fine job of introducing gender inclusive language, without "going overboard."

 

[Salty]

Thread is closed
OP is banned