Do you think the SBC is more in danger of turning pentecostal or muslim?So, tongues is now more important than saying Allah is Jehovah?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Do you think the SBC is more in danger of turning pentecostal or muslim?So, tongues is now more important than saying Allah is Jehovah?
I would prefer he still be Calvinist. I respect Calvinist theology(not agree with) but I detest wishey washey theology.Agreed. This is why I can't figure it out. The former SBC president had a problem with calvinists. Oh well, as long as they know what they are doing to promote their convictions!!!![]()
I don't think Charisma is a danger, I see it as a positive. I see abuses of Charisma as a danger. I see his error in mis-identifying who God is as being quite grave.Do you think the SBC is more in danger of turning pentecostal or muslim?
The quotes seem to be pretty specific that the view being presented is that the Muslims know of the true God, but are iignorant of jesus as his Messiah.So the answer, then, is "No;" you haven't read his book or more than the blurb in the linked article. Of course further context is needed. You're accusing a believer and seeking to cause division in doing so. Perhaps you're mad about Patterson and you're seeking retribution against Greear, I don't know. What I do know is that, without full and proper context, you're arguing against a strawman of your own creation.
It may very well be that Greear is wrong in his assessment. However, you are also in the wrong in what you are doing here.
The Archangel
No, one is error, the other is heresy!So, tongues is now more important than saying Allah is Jehovah?
IF that is indeed his view, that is a heresyIt simply means that we are both referring to the only, One deity when we say “God.”
That is what Greear said. He is totally wrong. It was linked above in Post # 67. I think that Greear is trying to hide this.
Three Christian Misconceptions About Muslims – Summit Life with J.D. Greear
If he holds to those views, do you think he would want to be really clear about them though?So the answer, then, is "No;" you haven't read his book or more than the blurb in the linked article. Of course further context is needed. You're accusing a believer and seeking to cause division in doing so. Perhaps you're mad about Patterson and you're seeking retribution against Greear, I don't know. What I do know is that, without full and proper context, you're arguing against a strawman of your own creation.
It may very well be that Greear is wrong in his assessment. However, you are also in the wrong in what you are doing here.
The Archangel
Of course the God of Christianity and the god of Islam are not one in the same. But you’re missing my point (and Greer’s too): A linguistic reference to Allah (which is the generic word for god in the Arabic language just as our word God is generic for God in English) does not mean one is actually referencing the false god of Islam.
The Archangel
Is he saying that Muslims do not view Allah as their name for God?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
the Yahweh that the OT scriptures talk of is NOT the God of the bible?No. I didn't. I, and Paul, clearly stated that the God of the Jews is NOT the Triune God of the bible.
The above is one of the reasons I seldom respond to your nonsense. You can't seem to understand even the simplest sentences. Paul is clearly telling them that JESUS is LORD! By rejecting Him they reject God. There is no Godhead without Jesus!
So the answer, then, is "No;" you haven't read his book or more than the blurb in the linked article. Of course further context is needed. You're accusing a believer and seeking to cause division in doing so. Perhaps you're mad about Patterson and you're seeking retribution against Greear, I don't know. What I do know is that, without full and proper context, you're arguing against a strawman of your own creation.
It may very well be that Greear is wrong in his assessment. However, you are also in the wrong in what you are doing here.
The Archangel
I would see Charasmatic Chaos a grave threat, such as word of faith, modern prophets/apostles, but if able to keep it under wraps so to speak... TheI don't think Charisma is a danger, I see it as a positive. I see abuses of Charisma as a danger. I see his error in mis-identifying who God is as being quite grave.
Even though it often does, Charisma does not have to lead to chaos.I would see Charasmatic Chaos a grave threat, such as word of faith, modern prophets/apostles, but if able to keep it under wraps so to speak... The
issue of Allah and Yahweh being same God much graver issue!
True, but the Movement needs to pubically declare and put out of their midst the heretics such as Copeland, Hinn, and the gang!Even though it often does, Charisma does not have to lead to chaos.
Also add need to have women made equal to men in spiritual authority/leadership in churchThere are 3 compromises trending in the Church. Creation, Cessation, Love of Nation. All three have become politically incorrect. Most popular Christian leaders compromise on all 3.
Also add need to have women made equal to men in spiritual authority/leadership in church
Love of nation is not and never was a Christian matter. That crept into the SBC with the fundamentalist takeover which resulted in an unBiblical blending of support for the Republican party and the Christian faith. Jesus said that He did not come to establish a Kingdom on Earth but rather a Heavenly Kingdom. Blending Church and state is akin to the view held by most Jews that the messiah would lead thm to a great military victory and re-establish israel as a worldly power. That's why they crusified Christ.There are 3 compromises trending in the Church. Creation, Cessation, Love of Nation. All three have become politically incorrect. Most popular Christian leaders compromise on all 3.
There are 3 compromises trending in the Church. Creation, Cessation, Love of Nation. All three have become politically incorrect. Most popular Christian leaders compromise on all 3.
Love of nation is not and never was a Christian matter. T....
I'm interested to hear you expand these thoughts.
The Archangel