Obama Will Sign Spending Bill Despite Earmarks

[mcdirector]

Pork was only $785 Billion, that is billion with a B, so what's to complain about?

ack - hardly worth mentioning . . .

 

[Revmitchell]

I was listening to Cavuto interviewing someone who's name I missed because I was doing other things. BUT Cavuto was asking about all the earmarks and the guy said, "what earmarks" - my paraphrase, but his point was that the definition of an earmark is in the eye of the beholder.

Kind of reminded me of other redefining of words by politicians.

That's right. Odrama and his ilk think they are being slick.

 

[SeekingTruth]

What hypocrisy

Well, you can thank Bush for most of the problems, but I guess when a republican spends it's alright with you. Why do you hate liberals so much? Does Jesus approve of this behavior?

This is the height of hypocrisy. A person who supports Obama, who in turn is rabid in his support of infanticide on a level that puts Hitler, Stalin and maybe even Pol Pot (sp?) to shame, dares call on the name of a Holy God. Shame on you.

 

[Pastor Larry]

The anthrax attacks happened after 9/11/2001.

And how many people died in these?

 

[KenH]

Why does the number matter? Every life is important to those of us who are pro-life.

 

[JustChristian]

Um, most of it. Are you really praising a bill you don't know anything about? These things were listed at length in another thread.

You would do well to find out the facts before commenting on it.

I'm not praising anything. I simply asked for examples of the worst pork in the bill. If you can't give any I will assume you know nothing about what you're saying.

 

[Pastor Larry]

Why does the number matter? Every life is important to those of us who are pro-life.

Don't kid yourself, Ken. Life wasn't important enough for you to vote for it. You voted for money over life.

And the anthrax attacks weren't national terrorist attack disasters. More people died in Detroit last week from murder than died in the anthrax attacks. That doesn't make either okay, but neither does it show that Bush didn't keep us safe after 9/11.

In your haste to try to smear Bush again, you reached too far and someone pointed it out.

 

[Pastor Larry]

I'm not praising anything. I simply asked for examples of the worst pork in the bill. If you can't give any I will assume you know nothing about what you're saying.

I am pretty sure you praised it, but I feel no need to list a bunch of projects because there was a long list posted here in the last several weeks. I could list them, but why? They were already listed.

 

[KenH]

That doesn't make either okay, but neither does it show that Bush didn't keep us safe after 9/11.

If I recall correctly George W. Bush became president on 1/20/2001, not on 9/12/2001.

 

[JustChristian]

Don't kid yourself, Ken. Life wasn't important enough for you to vote for it. You voted for money over life.

And the anthrax attacks weren't national terrorist attack disasters. More people died in Detroit last week from murder than died in the anthrax attacks. That doesn't make either okay, but neither does it show that Bush didn't keep us safe after 9/11.

In your haste to try to smear Bush again, you reached too far and someone pointed it out.

I voted for life by voting for the candidate that pledged to end the Iraq war. You think you voted for life (against abortion) but once again the republicans would have played a cruel trick on you by mothing anti-abortion but doing nothing about it.

 

[Pastor Larry]

If I recall correctly George W. Bush became president on 1/20/2001, not on 9/12/2001.

Good recollection, but hardly relevant to the point.

 

[Pastor Larry]

I voted for life by voting for the candidate that pledged to end the Iraq war.

And he is doing nothing about it, which most of us knew going in that he wouldn't do anything about it.

You think you voted for life (against abortion) but once again the republicans would have played a cruel trick on you by mothing anti-abortion but doing nothing about it.

They have done things about it, and you can be assured the the SCOTUS nominees would have been different. You didn't vote for life by voting for Obama.

 

[Andy T.]

I voted for life by voting for the candidate that pledged to end the Iraq war. You think you voted for life (against abortion) but once again the republicans would have played a cruel trick on you by mothing anti-abortion but doing nothing about it.

How is funding overseas abortion, pro-life?

How is making doctors perform abortions, pro-life?

How is not providing vital medical care to a baby surviving abortion, pro-life?

How is nominating pro-abortion judges (a litmus test for Obama), pro-life?

 

[Revmitchell]

the republicans would have played a cruel trick on you by mothing anti-abortion but doing nothing about it.

That has been debunked on this board. But you keep carrying on with your knowingly false statements.

 

[JustChristian]

I am pretty sure you praised it, but I feel no need to list a bunch of projects because there was a long list posted here in the last several weeks. I could list them, but why? They were already listed.

Post the link. I have found a long list of pork that was included in the Bush bailout bill. Maybe that's what you're thinking about.

 

[rbell]

Post the link. I have found a long list of pork that was included in the Bush bailout bill. Maybe that's what you're thinking about.

Riiiight...a thousand page bill, nearly a trillion dollars. No pork. Riiiight.

You get out much these days?


(BTW...there were examples given in other threads...but you'll dismiss or deny them...because Bush is satan ).

 

[dragonfly]

How is funding overseas abortion, pro-life?

How is making doctors perform abortions, pro-life?

How is not providing vital medical care to a baby surviving abortion, pro-life?

How is nominating pro-abortion judges (a litmus test for Obama), pro-life?

All Christians are not as concerned with abortion as your are.

 

[Revmitchell]

All Christians are not as concerned with abortion as your are.

And a sad commentary on Christianity.

 

[dcorbett]

All Christians are not as concerned with abortion as your are.

Wow, what is your definition of a Christian?

Mine is someone who follows God's guidance.....and not killing babies is part of that guidance, I would hope.

 

[dragonfly]

Wow, what is your definition of a Christian?

Someone who repents of their sin and trust the Lord Jesus Christ and his finished work on the cross.

What's yours?