Well, I wouldn't want to go off topic, but I believe the 70 weeks of Daniel 9:24-27 to have been Israel's "last chance". I believe that as a nation, Israel is no longer God's people, and their probation closed in 34 A.D. after Christ told the pharisees that the kingdom of God would be taken from them and given to a nation bearing fruit. I also believe that all of God's promises are conditional based on our obedience to him. He will never forsake us, but we are capable of forsaking him.
Daniel 9:24-27 is a tremendous prophecy that calculates almost to the day the first coming of Christ. It also prophecies the coming Tribulation and the coming Antichrist. It says nothing about "Israel's last chance."
Paul writing well after 34 A.D., (he wasn't saved until after that date) wrote this:
1 Corinthians 10:32 Give none offence, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God:
--It is obvious that the Jews still existed. Israel still existed.
At even a later date, after the first epistle to the Corinthians, he writes:
Romans 9:3-4 For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh:
4
Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;
--Israel still existed far after Pentecost. Paul wasn't writing about something nonexistent. We wasn't praying about the air. He was praying for his nation--his kinsman according to the flesh--that nation that still existed, according to Paul's own words. Do you deny Paul's words?
I would have to agree. Salvation is wholly of the Lord. Of ourselves we can do nothing. I have no disagreement here.
However, is it not clear from scripture that we must first accept the gift of salvation before it can be ours?
Of course, that is what salvation is all about.
"Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved." It is that simple.
Think of parents giving free gifts to their children.
I give free gifts to my children. First they are my children. They will always be my children. There is nothing that can ever change that fact. No one can change their DNA. Nothing you or anyone else can do can change the fact they will always be my children. The fact that I am able to give gifts to them is simply a matter of either compassion or grace depending on the circumstances.
Assuming we're talking about good parents here, they will not take away the gift from their child. But that child has the choice to throw that gift in the garbage. The parents can't stop him from doing that, but they did not take away the gift from their child. The promise still holds. The child has to claim the promise by keeping that gift.
No he doesn't. He is my child no matter whether he takes the gift or not. He was born my child and nothing can ever change that. He can do what he wants with the gift. That is a red herring and totally irrelevant to the fact that he is my child.
When I was born again I was born into the family of God and nothing, absolutely nothing, can ever change that fact. I was given eternal life. Nothing, absolutely nothing can change that fact. If eternal life could be taken away then it would not be eternal; it would only be temporary, and Christ would be found to be a liar. Eternal means eternal, not temporary. Do words have meaning with you?
In order for God to save people, there has to be the element of human cooperation. To think otherwise is to live on presumption.
Salvation throughout the Bible is unconditional, and always has been. It is all of Christ. Man does nothing; merits nothing; deserves nothing; and does not have a part in the work of Christ. It is unconditionally the work of Christ. There is no human cooperation! What part did you play in atoning for the sins of mankind? I would really like to know.
And I whole-heartedly agree! The only difference is that I believe it is still possible for us to reject Christ if we do not remain faithful to Him.
That is not Biblical. God remains faithful even when we do not. It is God that keeps our salvation; not we.
Does this verse have no meaning to you:
Philippians 1:6 Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ:
--Christ began the work; and will continue to perform it until he comes.
It is not me; it is Christ.
Rev. 3:16 "So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth."
To me it's very apparent that those who have been with Christ will be spued out of God's mouth if they turn their backs on him. There are COUNTLESS individuals who have claimed to be saved, yet they ended up rejecting Christ in the end and became some of the worst people. Can I judge them? No, but I can't say they are going to heaven in their current condition either.
1. He is writing to pastors of churches.
2. Churches are composed of believers, thus he is writing to believers.
3. Who are those that are cold? They also are believers; hence the lukewarm are also believers?
4. He is speaking about the level of Christian service, not salvation.
5. He is using a dramatic illustration for effect. The promise is that Christ will never leave us nor forsake us. You cannot compose doctrine out of an illustration. Proper hermeneutics ought to teach you that.
6. The next verse, 17, tells us that he was speaking of the church's worldliness, not salvation. The Lord hates worldliness in believers, but that doesn't make them unsaved.
James 4:6, 7 -- "But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble. Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you."
Why does James admonish us to "resist the devil" if there is no human cooperation? Even when we are under God's grace, God expects us to resist the devil. If we cooperate with God, He will impart strength to overcome as Christ overcame.
Look through the book of James. Almost every chapter begins with "my brethren." He is speaking to believers. It is a book written about practical Christian living. That is the theme. To the believer God gives more grace, not the unbeliever. God gives grace to the humble believer not the unbeliever. God gives grace to the believer who submits himself to God, not the unbeliever. The believer is commanded to resist the devil. This command is given in many places in the Bible, not just here. We are in spiritual warfare. We need to resist the devil. Jesus resisted the devil, as he was tempted by him in the wilderness. Is is so unusual that we should be tempted by the devil, that we need to resist him?
There is no human cooperation here. This is not speaking of salvation. It is spiritual warfare. What has this to do with salvation? Nothing!
Here are a couple more texts to ponder:
James 1:6 "But let him ask in faith, nothing wavering. For he that wavereth is like a wave of the sea driven with the wind and tossed."
--Nothing to do with salvation.
Hebrews 10:23,24 "Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised; ) And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works."
Why are we counseled to not "waver" if it is impossible to jump off the ship? The promise that the ship is going straight to heaven remains. But nobody is going to stop you from jumping off the ship if you choose. Not until we have reached the shore (heaven) can we say that it is impossible to cast off salvation.
Take Scripture in its context. A believer's faith may waver when asking for something in prayer. He may be unsure if it is the will of God. James goes on and explains that in James 4:1-4. Read the passage. It has nothing to do with salvation.
Verses 25 and 26 continue to build the case and clarify:
Verse 25 "Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching."
This has nothing to do with salvation, but with fellowship with one and other as believers. You like to take Scripture out of context don't you?
Verse 26 "For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,"
Is the scripture not clear that even after we have received the knowledge of the truth, we can still wilfully afterward?
What was the author explaining. There is only one sacrifice for sins. That is Jesus Christ. There is no other sacrifice.
There are many that consider another way (such as Jews) even after they have heard the truth. These Jews (the book's name is Hebrews) were considering going back to Judaism. There was nothing in Judaism.
Now let us continue further.
Hebrews 10:38,39 --- "Now the just shall live by faith: but IF any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him. But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul."
How clear this last verse makes it that we can turn back if we don't press on. But because we live by faith, we will not be among those who draw back! If it were not true that we can turn back, there would be no need for the apostle to even write this!
How clear it is indeed!
We are not of them that draw back. We believe in them that believe to the saving of the soul! Are not you? Don't you believe that Christ can save one's soul? There is the promise right there. The believer does not draw back unto perdition. The unbeliever may; the believer never.