Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
How so? Please explain.After reading what you have written.I noticed you are way off on the covenants issue
For Calvinists, that's true.Originally posted by Roguelet:
Predestination has EVERYTHING to do with assurance of salvation you cannot seperate the two.
I do not believe God goes back on his word. However, he can revoke. Like the servant who was completely forgiven who had his forgiveness revoked.God does not go back on his word like MAN he does not UNDO anything there you go humanizing him again.
Why do scriptures exhort us to believe, if we have no choice in the matter?I noticed you couldn't twist the scriptures on belief and that even this came from God.
I will not explain those verses away, as I agree with them. So I don't know where that leaves this discussion. If you do choose to respond, I would like to know why do scriptures exhort us to believe, if we have no choice in the matter.You have not explained these verses away yet so i will not answer you till you do
Where does one get the idea that the calvinistic thought of predestination negates free will, or absolves one of the respinsibility to believe? This might be what the hypercalvinists teach, but this is neither calvinistic nor scriptural.Originally posted by natters:
... why do scriptures exhort us to believe, if we have no choice in the matter.
You answered the question when you used the word "us". Since only we ("us"), the children of God have the capacity to believe, it is to make it evident who the believers are.I would like to know why do scriptures exhort us to believe, if we have no choice in the matter.
How do you know you didn't lose your salvation. You want that to be true but that doesn't make it so according to the Bible. By the way, I'm not judging anyone. Christ will judge us all.Originally posted by SAMPLEWOW:
StraightAndNarrow I do understand. I spent 20 years living wickedly and out of God's will and was chastened but never ,I repeat ,but never did I take back or loss my salvation.
And no that doesn't mean I should sit back and just what for God's return.
And who are you to judge what fruit is ?
Are you Job's brother?
Please explain John 10:29 the word's right out of Christ's mouth.
I quoted scripture from the Bible. Please speak to that rather that your own doctrine.Originally posted by Ed Edwards:
Thank you Bro. Phillip.
Most people like to argue about the
AS = always saved part.
Very few who argue such want to even talk
about the OS = once saved part.
Once saved by Jesus, a person stays saved by
Jesus.
For those of us in Christ:
We are saved to do good works; we are not
saved by our good works.
We were justified to do good works; we were not
justified by our good works.
We are sanctified to do good works; we
are not sanctified by our good works.
We will be glorified to do good works; we will
not be glorified by our good works.
So it's just to identify us? It has nothing to do with entering the covenant?Originally posted by HankD:
You answered the question when you used the word "us". Since only we ("us"), the children of God have the capacity to believe, it is to make it evident who the believers are.
I have already explained why I do not think they are the same fire, as the fire in 1 Cor 3:15 is a purging fire for all believers, while the fire in John 15 is only for those branches that are cast off from the vine - the branches that are not cast off are purged in verse 2, not by the fire. In other words: 1 Cor 3 = all purged, John 15 = some purged others burned. If you don't agree, perhaps you could explain the difference.In the venue of your view of John 15 natters you have not proven that the "fire" spoken of in John 15 is eternal hell-fire but may very well be the "fire" in 1 Corinthains 3:15.
Exactly Hank the verse never says that the one who DIDN'T abide was ever part of the branch. you can't take one verse out of the bible and build a doctrine on it.Originally posted by Roguelet:
Hank wrote </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />natters are you refering to the John 15 passage? If so the term "cut off" is not used but the words "cast out".
The branch being cast out is presumably not part of the vine and never was so.