Am I wrong to assume you hold to dispensationalism?Baptists. i don't like baby dedications, it seems like a modern invention. Theology within baptist church (and others) is terrible.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Am I wrong to assume you hold to dispensationalism?Baptists. i don't like baby dedications, it seems like a modern invention. Theology within baptist church (and others) is terrible.
No, not my nonsense, but YOUR IGNORANCE.thats nonsense. if you take it that way then every time i go swimming im being Baptised, as i'm immersed in water.
Am I wrong to assume you hold to dispensationalism?
Matthew 24:13
but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved.
Am I wrong to assume you hold to dispensationalism?
To me, that's a main proof of the symbolism if baptism. Jesus didn't hesitate to save that man because He knew that man's heart & that he believed in Jesus, knowing full well he couldn't be baptized.Well, to my knowledge, the thief on the cross was never baptized. He entered heaven because God said he could come.
No, not my nonsense, but YOUR IGNORANCE.
From Strongs Concordance for "baptize":
Greek "baptizo":
It came into English C. 1300 & originally meant the same as the Greek, & was soon applied to the Christian rite as well as any immersion into water of anyone/anything.
- to dip repeatedly, to immerse, to submerge (of vessels sunk)
- to cleanse by dipping or submerging, to wash, to make clean with water, to wash one's self, bathe
- to overwhelm
Educate yourself a little before you call something nonsense.
Historically, Open Baptists were Baptist congregations in England that accepted for communion, as well as church membership, those who had been baptized as infants, without requiring them to be baptized again. If baptism is just an outward symbol of repentance, is it necessary for Baptist churches to require that new members be re-baptized?
hat person tried to tell me that, because I had to wait to be baptized for several months due to weather(Our church has no natatorium & baptizes in a creek) that I was not saved til then
it is nonsense. Scripture isn't saying that once you repent and believe go and have a bath. No baptism is much more than that, as i'm sure you agree. There is a specific purpose to be Baptised.
Let's be honest. American Baptists today are some of the worst paedobaptists on the planet.
For example, how many Baptist churches are using silly means like fire trucks to entice kids into baptism, before they are even mature enough to repent and believe themselves?
How many of these kids will grow up with the false assurance that they can live like unbelievers the rest of their lives and still go to heaven because they got baptized in a fire truck at vacation Bible school?
I agree. However, I think the proper response to this is to avoid it, preach against it, and try to root it out of our practice whenever possible. That is, as opposed to thinking, "Oh, well, Baptists are already practicing paedobaptism so what does it hurt to receive others who were baptized as infants."Let's be honest. American Baptists today are some of the worst paedobaptists on the planet.
For example, how many Baptist churches are using silly means like fire trucks to entice kids into baptism, before they are even mature enough to repent and believe themselves?
So by "regenerational Baptist" you are saying that you have run across someone on the CARM site who claims to be a Baptist and also believes a person is saved by baptism? I've heard tell that there are some of those, but have never run across one.Funny; I'm having a discussion with a "regenerational Baptist" on the CARM site. That person tried to tell me that, because I had to wait to be baptized for several months due to weather(Our church has no natatorium & baptizes in a creek) that I was not saved til then.
The position of NT immersion of Believers long predates the popularity of dispensationalism. Back in the day, I was taught in a Baptist Polity class by Dr. Richard Weeks at MBBC. He said:Honestly, dispensationalism has muddied this up and brought legalism into the church where it ought not to exist.
Piper also understands and follows covenant theology. Are you saying you disagree with covenant theology in regards to the church being the chosen/elect people of God who recognize the covenant seal through baptism?
Try asking a dispensationalist if anyone in church history taught a pre-trib rapture before the 1830s. What did Jesus himself say about the tribulation?
Historic premillennialists like John Piper teach that the rapture occurs at the end of the tribulation.
Funny; I'm having a discussion with a "regenerational Baptist" on the CARM site. That person tried to tell me that, because I had to wait to be baptized for several months due to weather(Our church has no natatorium & baptizes in a creek) that I was not saved til then. I asked him when he acquired JESUS' authority to say when one was saved. I knew what I felt at the time & I was eager to be baptized, but had I died before I was baptized, I would've been just-as-saved as I am now.
I grew up in dispensationalism and have moved to covenant theology as I have studied scripture.No i'm not a dispensationalist. I am still studying and learning but I would be more in line with 1689 federalism.
Why do you think I was a dispensationalist? What about you?
No as the prior one was not a valid Baptism!Here's the rub. A person who is drawn to faith at any age, but was baptized as an infant can honestly say they have been baptized and they are a believer. Have they fulfilled the command to be baptized?
Can get tricky though, as some seem to see it as actually bringing them into Covenant with God, and only if they undo by disbelief gets undone!Yes, and that's traditionally the non-Baptist Reformed understanding of infant baptism, that baptism itself isn't regenerative, but instead that it symbolizes one's entrance into the covenant.
Same here!I grew up in dispensationalism and have moved to covenant theology as I have studied scripture.