• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

OSAS made simple

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Calvin did not teach Universal atonement that is what the enemies of Grace teach. Look up a sermon on the Lord's supper and he clearly states some take the Lord's Supper who Christ did not die for them no look it up do some research instead of going with the enemies of Grace and what they have to say and take Calvin out of context of a half a sentence here a phrase there when he's talking about the universal offer of the Gospel
You make reference to Rodger Nicole's article will go ahead and read the whole thing carefully
 

1689Dave

Well-Known Member
Calvin did not teach Universal atonement that is what the enemies of Grace teach. Look up a sermon on the Lord's supper and he clearly states some take the Lord's Supper who Christ did not die for them no look it up do some research instead of going with the enemies of Grace and what they have to say and take Calvin out of context of a half a sentence here a phrase there when he's talking about the universal offer of the Gospel
I don't know that for a fact. Dort is based on universal atonement in points 4 & 5.
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
It's there by extension. Who are the losers in this context if not the people it affects?
It’s the leaders that Paul is addressing, not all Christians. The “loss” is dependent upon their followers being faithful in persecution. If the followers stumble, due to persecution, the leaders fail and lose their “reward”, though their salvation remains.

peace to you
 

1689Dave

Well-Known Member
It’s the leaders that Paul is addressing, not all Christians. The “loss” is dependent upon their followers being faithful in persecution. If the followers stumble, due to persecution, the leaders fail and lose their “reward”, though their salvation remains.

peace to you
But it's the victims of the bad teacher who are the evidence. This would include you or me. This is why I don't trust teachers. I'm sharing some precious truth but you only trample it under foot.
 

SovereignGrace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I don't know that for a fact. Dort is based on universal atonement in points 4 & 5.
I honestly don’t think the Canons of Dort teach universal atonement , seeing they were refuting the Five Points of the Remonstrance, who did teach universal atonement.
 

1689Dave

Well-Known Member
I honestly don’t think the Canons of Dort teach universal atonement , seeing they were refuting the Five Points of the Remonstrance, who did teach universal atonement.
They don't teach universal atonement. But their points 4-5 teach Arminian style salvation by works, but under divine coercion. As though Calvin taught universal atonement. = they are logically inconsistant.
 

SovereignGrace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
They don't teach universal atonement. But their points 4-5 teach Arminian style salvation by works, but under divine coercion. As though Calvin taught universal atonement. = they are logically inconsistant.
I’m going to have to read them in depth for myself. I honestly don’t think they teach that, but I could be wrong.
 

SovereignGrace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
They don't teach universal atonement. But their points 4-5 teach Arminian style salvation by works, but under divine coercion. As though Calvin taught universal atonement. = they are logically inconsistant.
Are you referring to the fourth and fifth heads?
 

1689Dave

Well-Known Member
For clarification, are you saying that the Canon of Dordt diverged from what Calvin/institutes taught?
Possibly by teaching Limited Atonement. Points 4-5 are not logically consistent. Limited atonement saves the elect. Not perseverance of the saints (works).
 

1689Dave

Well-Known Member
For clarification, are you saying that the Canon of Dordt diverged from what Calvin/institutes taught?
It seems. I've never read Institutes. What I know is the 5 points are true to scripture up until points 4-5 which teaches salvation by works, albeit coerced works.
 

Martin Marprelate

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It seems. I've never read Institutes. What I know is the 5 points are true to scripture up until points 4-5 which teaches salvation by works, albeit coerced works.
You are missing the point, brother. Perseverance is the evidence that one is a saint, not a work one does to become one. Nonetheless, our Lord's word stands: "But he who endures to the end shall be saved.' And by implication, he who doesn't, won't. Read Acts 26:20.
 

1689Dave

Well-Known Member
You are missing the point, brother. Perseverance is the evidence that one is a saint, not a work one does to become one. Nonetheless, our Lord's word stands: "But he who endures to the end shall be saved.' And by implication, he who doesn't, won't. Read Acts 26:20.
You are teaching works salvation. What I'm saying is that we are saved no matter what. Even our worst sins cannot prevent our salvation. Go ahead and gasp a few times, it's all right. Because God gives us a nature that hates sin and loves righteousness. So while you are trying to mend the flesh and trust in yourself, the born again are doing what they are designed to do. And that is to live holy lives.
 
Top