Hope of Glory said:Why not? Jesus' did.
You've got to be kidding!
Where are the scriptures used in context on this whole thing?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Hope of Glory said:Why not? Jesus' did.
But as we see the rich man and Lazarus had a temporary body,till theirs are resurrected,they had fingers and tounge.
Hope of Glory said:Spiritual salvation is based upon the finished work of the Lord Jesus. Where some people get confused is they fail to distinguish between spiritual salvation and the salvation of the soul, because the salvation of the soul does require works on the part of the individual, such as repentance, bearing fruit, etc.
Hope of Glory said:Ephesians 4:9 (Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?
rk "to the lower parts of the earth." This phrase has been variously interpreted: (1) The traditional view understands it as a reference to the underworld (hell), where Jesus is thought to have descended in the three days between his death and resurrection. In this case, "of the earth" would be a partitive genitive. (2) A second option is to translate the phrase "of the earth" as a genitive of apposition: "to the lower parts, namely, the earth" (as in the present translation). Many recent scholars hold this view and argue that it is a reference to the incarnation. (3) A third option, which also sees the phrase "of the earth" as a genitive of apposition, is that the descent in the passage occurs after the ascent rather than before it, and refers to the descent of the Spirit at Pentecost (cf. Acts 4:11-16). Support for this latter view is found in the intertestamental and rabbinic use of Ps 68:18 (quoted in v. 8), which is consistently and solely interpreted as a reference to Moses' ascent of Mt. Sinai to "capture" the words of the law. The probability, therefore, is that the comments here in v. 9 reflect a polemic against the interpretation of Ps 68:18 in certain circles as a reference to Moses. See W. H. Harris, The Descent of Christ (AGJU 32), 46-54; 171-204.
StraightAndNarrow said:The spirit and the soul are one and the same in the Bible. Eternal salvation deals with that part of a person which doesn't die physically, that is the soul/spirit.
Diggin in da Word said:Acts 2:27 is a reference to the grave (Sheol), not hell (Gehenna). The other two verses do not say Christ went to hell. Also, Paradise is not hell.
Hell was not in view of Paradise. Nowhere in scripture can one find a passage that says it was. Paradise was in view of hell, but not vice versa.Rex77 said:Marcia quote
--------------------------------
The "lower parts of the earth" does not refer to as we think of it - the place of punishment. It could be referring to the grave. There are also other views.
---------------------------------
Commentators can't agree on anything.
Jesus gave us a word picture about lower parts of earth.
in the rich man and Lazarurs
1 hell was within view of paradise with a gulf between.
2 scripture tells us hell is in the lower parts of earth.
3 Abrahams bosom = paradise, Jesus went there he told the thief so.
4 Jesus took all OT saints to heaven after he rose.because Paul went
there the third heaven.
Just look for the clues they are all there.
Lu 16:23 And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.
Lu 16:24 And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.
Lu 16:26 And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that [would come] from thence.
By the way jesus was not burried in the lower parts of the earth he was in a garden tomb.
standingfirminChrist said:The Bible tells us the rich man could see Lazarus and Abraham, but nowhere does it say they saw the rich man.
Hope of Glory said:I guess Paul misspoke then: 1 Thessalonians 5:23 And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
I guess all the passages concerning the salvation of the soul (works) that contradict spiritual salvation, really are contradictory.
Now, I don't really believe this: I believe the Scriptures are inerrant, and mean exactly what they say and that man is body, soul, and spirit.
Animals, as stated by the Bible have souls, but nowhere does the Bible state they have spirits.
I don't think God made a mistake; it means what it says.
Matthew Henry's Commentary said:
(3.) He is ordered into a doleful dungeon; Cast him into utter darkness. Our Saviour here insensibly slides out of this parable into that which it intimates-the damnation of hypocrites in the other world. Hell is utter darkness, it is darkness out of heaven, the land of light; or it is extreme darkness, darkness to the last degree, without the least ray or spark of light, or hope of it, like that of Egypt; darkness which might be felt; the blackness of darkness, as darkness itself, Job 10:22.
Matthew Henry's Commentary said:(2.) His doom is, to be cast into outer darkness. Here, as in what was said to the faithful servants, our Saviour slides insensibly out of the parable into the thing intended by it, and it serves as a key to the whole; for, outer darkness, where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth, is, in Christ's discourses, the common periphrasis of the miseries of the damned in hell. Their state is, {1.} Very dismal; it is outer darkness. Darkness is uncomfortable and frightful: it was one of the plagues of Egypt. In hell there are chains of darkness, 2 Pt. 2:4. In the dark no man can work, a fit punishment for a slothful servant. It is outer darkness, out from the light of heaven, out from the joy of their Lord, into which the faithful servants were admitted; out from the feast. Compare ch. 8:12; 22:13.
Then we agree. Two gospels.J. Jump said:[/color]
Parable of the Talents
Quote:
I fail to understand why you refuse to believe that Christ Jesus taught Paul everything he knew of this "dispensation" we live in. You say Paul Learned, but will not say it was Christ Jesus that taught Him. If I misstate in this matter, I apologize, but I do not see acknowledgement of this in your posts.
Of course Paul was taught personally by our Lord.
Not taken away, but delayed. Would God go back on His Word? He will come again for THEM. All are not in the Body of Christ.Quote:
Not only no longer Gentiles, but also no longer Jews
Exactly. One new man in Christ, neither Jew nor Gentile, becuase of the promises of the kingdom being taken away from Israel and also for Abraham's seed.
That gospel, or this gospel?Quote:
now know this for Christ Jesus revealed it to you, so Amen. But Adam didn't know this, nor Noah and forward. They were not asked or told to believe this gospel.
Exactly. That's what I have been saying all along.
Amen to you. We pray for the rapture, the event that unlocks the closed door of prophecy, allowing the tribulation to begin, and also His judgment of our faithfulness to His glory. Then after the tribulation and our rewards ceremony the nations will be judged (Matthew 25:31-32).Quote:
But I look to be with Christ in heaven before that "kingdom comes' as taught in the OT.
Yes we will be taken back to His home where we will stand before our Judge and have our works tried by the fire. Then after the seven-year tribulation then Christ will return to rule and reign with His bride from the heavens. And He will also rule from the physical earth from David's throne in Jerusalem. Oh that that day would come soon!