menageriekeeper
Active Member
There is a real and legitimate reason to have some amount of fear of government agencies that look into family matters. Many of the agents that work for these agencies have very personal and liberal ideologies that drive their investigations. Some deem any form of corporal punishment as abuse. And while they may not have the law they need to act against that they will work to make the situation appear what it is not so as to remove the children from a situation where corporal punishment is conducted. These agencies seem to have very little oversight with way to much authority.
Thank you, Rev. M. I bolded part of this for Joe's edification. Sorry Joe, for answering your last question first.
unbelievable
Sorry for the numerous questions but it would be interesting to know how they get away with this-
Who does the paddling? Are the parents present in the room? Does the school need written permission from the children's parents? If you refuse to allow your child to be struck, what happens? Do your chilldren attend this school system?
In order: The principal usually; no; no; suspension; yes.
You are showing your liberal California roots (not saying you are liberal btw, but that California is generally liberal. Spanking here, isn't nearly the issue it is there.)
Corporal punishment is used mostly in the elementary and middle schools. High Schoolers are generally not affected by three licks from the principal's paddle and are usually given inschool suspensions. (ISS is totally boring and horrible according to the hsers I know. Other than that they aren't really impressed by any of it. HSers are hard.)
Well I certainly hope so. I would assume he is "looked at" by CPS, or possibly the designated school nurse prior to making the call to CPS. Please correct me if I am wrong.
See italics. School nurse would either make the call herself or if in doubt consult with the school principal. But, a child who claims to have suffered abuse but shows no signs of said abuse (bruising, welts, etc) would likely NOT get reported.
Except in the case of sexual abuse (where signs would normally be hidden) our administrators do not always take a child at his/her word. Kids get mad and lie about their parents all the time. The school isn't about to start a whole CPS investigation in the absence of any real evidence. Sexual accusations get kicked up not only to CPS but also to law enforcement and are treated very very carefully.
Wow, I don't know what to say. I bet if a CPS worker heard this, it would certainly be suspicious. Did you have a bad experience with CPS?
Okay Joe, just what about explaining what abuse is to a kid who isn't abused and has never experienced such is suspicious? Why would one not want a child to understand the implications of making a false report to CPS?
And no, I haven't have a bad experience with CPS. CPS here is very family oriented (to much so, in my opinion) to the extent that children are sometimes returned to parents who, in my opinion only, shouldn't be allowed a pet much less a child.