blacksheep
Member
Maybe you can tell me what armies other than Roman armies destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD!You have got a vivid imagination.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Maybe you can tell me what armies other than Roman armies destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD!You have got a vivid imagination.
Dealing with Zechariah 12...Zachariah 12-14
I will strike every horse rwith panic, and its rider rwith madness. Butfor the sake of the house of Judah I will keep my eyes open, when I strike every horse ofthe peoples rwith blindness
The battle described is on horseback with swords
“And the LORD will give salvation to the tents of Judah first,
Modern Jews do not live in tents
13.2 And also I will remove from the land the prophets and the spirit of uncleanness.
There are no prophets anymore
I can go on, but see the picture, It is not about some futuristic fantasy battle.
I didn't say he was the beast and bible doesn't say the prince was the beast. Daniel said the PEOPLE of the prince who would come would destroy the city and sanctuary. The prince did come and his people did destroy the city and sanctuary.
If you don't believe that, tell me where is the temple now?
Trying to discuiss scripture with you is like discussing it with JW's. You read it then say something completely different.
Scripture doesn't say that there would be no gentiles in Jerusalem, but that it would be trodden down by gentiles.
Many writers in the past believed that the times of the gentiles began with Nebuchanezzar's madness and the seven times of his madness was prophetic of seven times of the times of the gentiles, or 2520 years.
Zachariah 12-14
I will strike every horse rwith panic, and its rider rwith madness. Butfor the sake of the house of Judah I will keep my eyes open, when I strike every horse ofthe peoples rwith blindness
The battle described is on horseback with swords
“And the LORD will give salvation to the tents of Judah first,
Modern Jews do not live in tents
13.2 And also I will remove from the land the prophets and the spirit of uncleanness.
There are no prophets anymore
I can go on, but see the picture, It is not about some futuristic fantasy battle.
THe OC prophets, apart from Haggai, Zechariah & Malachi prophesied before or during the Babylonian exile. Generally they prophesied -Similar prophecies about Jerusalem's destruction by OT prophets have the same possibilities. When an impending invasion by Babylon or Assyria was coming, the Prophet often spoke of them just a few years before the invasion occurred. The Luke 21 etc. prophecies presents the same issues and that is, "WHAT DIDN'T HAPPEN PROVES A FUTURE FULFILLMENT" or both future and past fulfillment. Things are mentioned in them that DIDN'T OCCUR or can only occur at the PAROUSIA or second coming of Christ.
An example of this is when Habakkuk wrote his book which I believe is completely FUTURE. Israel was soon to be invaded and interpreters believe it's a historical document. In my studies I find the entire book of Habakkuk a FUTURE prophecy. Isaiah 10 & 14 are also misinterpreted HISTORICALLY by futurist. Isaiah 14 &10 were written after Israel fell to the Babylonians and is believed to be about the fall of the Babylonian king Sennacherib, which it is NOT.
What prophecy in Daniel shows the beast is of Roman descent?I believe it's common knowledge that the Romans destroyed J & the temple then. What Daniel's prophecy shows is that the 'beast' will be of Roman descent, & no new one has been built since then. However, that covers a lotta ground, as there are descendants of Romans all over the world.
And J IS somewhat beaten down by gentiles, as only 62 % of its inhabitants are Jews. And the Jews don't dare try to stop the immense non-Jewish traffic coming & going from J.
Habakkuk 1:5 Behold ye among the heathen, and regard, and wonder marvellously: for I will work a work in your days, which ye will not believe, though it be told you. For, lo, I raise up the Chaldean's, that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwelling places that are not theirs. They are terrible and dreadful: their judgment and their dignity shall proceed of themselves. Their horses also are swifter than the leopards, and are more fierce than the evening wolves: and their horsemen shall spread themselves, and their horsemen shall come from far; they shall fly as the eagle that hasteth to eat. They shall come all for violence: their faces shall sup up as the east wind, and they shall gather the captivity as the sand.THe OC prophets, apart from Haggai, Zechariah & Malachi prophesied before or during the Babylonian exile. Generally they prophesied -
warnings & calls to repentance;
warnings of invasion;
promises of restoration;
encouragement of the faithful remnant in every generation;
prophecy of the Messiah, the Branch/Son of David who would accomplish the promised restoration;
prophecy of a New Covenant through the Messiah;
a fulfilment/end of the OC;
an eternal state of blessing.
We can therefore see the fulfilment of OC prophecy as -
imminent invasion in the lifetime of those hearing the prophecy, & restoration of the nation after repentance, normally within one generation (35-40 years) but in the case of Babylon, double that - 70 years;
the coming of Messiah perfects & ends the OC prophecies bringing about a new situation spoken of a "mystery" revealed by NC writers;
a perfect fulfilment of the Covenant promises to the Patriarchs, including the redeemed from all nations in a New Heaven & New Earth.
They NC writers do not consider the OC prophecy requires a yet future situation involving ethnic Israel as a restored nation suffering destruction & then a personal intervention by the LORD Jesus as an earth King reigning in Jerusalem, nor a third temple including animal sacrifices. Many thousands of Judaean Jews, Proselytes & exiled Israelites were saved by the Gospel & formed the NC church as recorded in Acts, and which soon included Gentiles without circumcision.
Jesus & the NC writers do not prophecy a physical, carnal, earthly fulfilment of prophecy for Israel apart from a NH&NE. They see the believers in Messiah as the redeemed people of God - "my people" - without regard for ethnicity. By faith children of Abraham.
Revelation should be understood in terms of the writings of John's fellow Apostles, not as a stand-alone prophecy.
Therefore the concept of dual- or multi-fulfilment of prophecy should be guided specifically by the NC writings, not by reinterpretation of OC prophecy.
We hear much from various schools of futurists about LITERAL fulfilment of prophecy, normally as yet future fulfilment rather than to the generation that heard the prophecy & the associated call to repentance & promise of restoration. Your interpretation of Habakkuk is an extraordinary non-literal approach.
In Hab. 1 the prophet is concerned with the corrupt spiritual state of the people of Judah. The LORD replies that he will deal with that situation by invasion by the Babylonians.
After further argument & discussion with the LORD, and the encouragement that "the just will live by faith" in Hab. 2, Habakkuk in Hab. 3 accepts the situation and prays for revival, "in wrath remember mercy" remembering God's past dealings with the nation in detail - see the cross references to the historical incidents.
He concludes with his own declaration of faith through whatever adversity follows, "I will be joyful in God my Saviour."
All this can & should, of course, be applied to every situation including our own, as Jesus does, but is not still future prophecy. We learn from Scripture & apply its truths but should not claim specific fulfilment to our own or of some future generation. We have A Gospel message & encouragement to live faithful lives.
All this futurism is a distraction. Prophecy was fulfilled in the coming & saving work of our Messiah, & the AD 70 eradication of the OC rituals.
While the disciples did ask two questions, they were related. The context was the same setting. In Matthew 24:34, Jesus told them that everything He had spoken in answer to both questions would be fulfilled within the lifetime of their generation.What needs to be understood in Matthew 24 is that the disciples ask Him not one, but two (at least) questions.
1. When will these things (destruction of Jerusalem) be?
2. what will be the sign of your coming and the end of the age?
Therefore it is necessary to distinguish between "All these things" (verse 33. Gk. panta tauta) and "Of that day" (Verses 36. Gk. peri de tes hemeras ekeines). Greek very often uses the Greek words for 'this' and 'that' to make a contrast and so it is here. 'These things' are the destruction of Jerusalem and the surrounding horrors. Of these there will be signs (verse 32), as indeed there were. The war went on for four years and the end was predictable for some time. But of 'That day' -- the day of our Lord's return, there will be no sign (verse 42). Christ is coming as a thief in the night (1 Thessalonians 5:2; Revelation 16:15). We are to keep watch.
There is no Biblical support for the Jews building a 3rd temple. They did see the rest of your "short list", though.They did not see the Jews building a 3rd temple in Jerusalem, nor the coming of the "beast" to power, the mark of the beast, the great tribulation, the abomination of desolation, and certainly not the return of Jesus. That's just a short list.
Matthew 24:4. "Take heed that no one deceives you......" Hs deceit come to an end since AD 70?While the disciples did ask two questions, they were related. The context was the same setting. In Matthew 24:34, Jesus told them that everything He had spoken in answer to both questions would be fulfilled within the lifetime of their generation.
Jesus did not say that deceit, false christs, wars, famines, earthquakes, tribulation, or false prophets would end in AD 70. He was pointing to the specific judgment on Jerusalem that came in the Jewish War of AD 66-70. Those who endured did not perish.Matthew 24:4. "Take heed that no one deceives you......" Hs deceit come to an end since AD 70?
V.5. "For many will come in My name, saying, 'I am the Christ,' and deceive many......." Have false Christs and false prophets come to an end since AD 70?
V.6. "And you will hear of wars and rumours of wars. See to it that you are not troubled, fo all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet." Have wars and rumours of wars stopped since ad 70? Should we be worried by them now that AD 70 is past? Did the end of anything happen in AD 70 or did things continue just as before?
V.7. ".....And there will be famines and earthquakes in various places." Have famines and earthquakes stopped occurring since AD 70?
V.9. "Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and kill you and you will be hated by all nations for My name's sake." Has persecution of Christians stopped since AD 70?
V.10. "And many will be offended, will betray one another, and will hate one another." Has this stopped since AD 70, whether amongst Christians or non-Christians?
V.11. "Then many false prophets will rise up and deceive many....." Have false prophecy and false teaching stopped since AD 70?
V.12. "And because lawlessness will abound, the love of many will grow cold." Did lawlessness cease in AD 70? Does the love of many no longer grow cold?
V.13. "But he who endures to the end shall be saved." Are those who endure to the end no longer saved since AD 70?
V.14. "And this Gospel of the kingdom will be preached in all the world as a witness to all nations, and then the end will come." Had the Gospel been preached to all nations by AD 70? Has the end come and nobody told me?
God described the coming events in terms that His immediate audience would understand. "The sword" almost always represented an army; that, of course, has been replaced by "the gun", horses almost-entirely replaced by motorized metal vehicles, etc.
Habakkuk 1:5 Behold ye among the heathen, and regard, and wonder marvellously: for I will work a work in your days, which ye will not believe, though it be told you. For, lo, I raise up the Chaldean's, that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwelling places that are not theirs. They are terrible and dreadful: their judgment and their dignity shall proceed of themselves. Their horses also are swifter than the leopards, and are more fierce than the evening wolves: and their horsemen shall spread themselves, and their horsemen shall come from far; they shall fly as the eagle that hasteth to eat. They shall come all for violence: their faces shall sup up as the east wind, and they shall gather the captivity as the sand.
The Chaldeans are the Babylonians, they are todays Arabs and Muslims. The big question is in whose days. Is Habakkuk's prophecy directed toward Judah? Look at the text carefully, it's directed to the nations/heathen NOT Habakkuk. Judah isn't implied and neither is Habakkuk's time period.
If we are to assume that Habakkuk 1 was fulfilled in his time, then we should see something in the text implying a siege, captivity, slavery, destruction of Jerusalem, and the destruction and pillaging of the temple in the chapter. We should see something in Hab.1 that resembles what actually took place in Nebuchadnezzar's siege of Judah. The problem is that very little in the passage is close to what actually took place.
Nebuchadnezzar didn't use terror, murder, violence, and such. His tactics were NOT terrible and dreadful. He surrounded the city and stopped everything from going in and out of it, and was able to take the city within 3 months. Most of the inhabitants were spared! He took most of Judah's elite captive, and left the rest of the peasants behind. He didn't destroy and pillaged the Temple and level the city and the temple until after the 3rd siege of Nebuchadnezzar. 2 Kings 25:1-10.
For, lo, I raise up the Chaldeans, that bitter and hasty nation, which...
....shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwellingplaces that are not
theirs...
The Babylonian Empire was not a big Empire. The Persian, Grecian, and Roman Empires were much larger. Babylon did not march through the "breadth (wide expanse) of the land to possess dwelling places that are not theirs." Jihadist foreign fighters fit this well both worldwide and in the Mid-East region.
"They shall come all for violence: (Terrorism) their faces shall sup up as the east wind, (Islamic form of worship) and they shall gather the captivity as the sand. (World domination)"
Terrorism, their form of worship, and goal of world domination ALL IN ONE VERSE! The 'east wind' is always associated with destruction. Sup up means to do so as a horde or an assembly. Islam is the only religion where it's followers "sup their face up to the east" even 5 times a day.
"The east wind is always associated with evil destructive wind." E. Swedenborg (1688-1772) said, "That wind, and especially the east wind, signifies nothing else than the dispersion of falsities and evils."
Some of the experts believe that Habakkuk chapter 1 is prophecy fulfilled.
But chapter 2 say's...
Habakkuk 2:1-3 I will stand upon my watch, and set me upon the tower, and will watch to see what he will say unto me, and what I shall answer when I am reproved. And the LORD answered me, and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it. For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry.
Daniel 9:26“And after the sixty-two weeks Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself; And the people of the prince who is to come Shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end of it shall be with a flood, And till the end of the war desolations are determined.What prophecy in Daniel shows the beast is of Roman descent?
There's PLENTY of implied Biblical support for a new temple. The "abomination of desolation" didn't occur in the old temple, so there MUST be a new one for it to occur in.There is no Biblical support for the Jews building a 3rd temple. They did see the rest of your "short list", though.
In Matthew 24, you take prophetic language and make it literal, with the signs in the sun and moon.
OK, then, please show us from history when those events DID occur.Here you take regular language and make it mean something it doesn't, A sword is Gun and A horse is a Ford Mustang.
Oh my....
Habakkuk 1:5 Behold ye among the heathen, and regard, and wonder marvellously: for I will work a work in your days, which ye will not believe, though it be told you. For, lo, I raise up the Chaldean's, that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwelling places that are not theirs. They are terrible and dreadful: their judgment and their dignity shall proceed of themselves. Their horses also are swifter than the leopards, and are more fierce than the evening wolves: and their horsemen shall spread themselves, and their horsemen shall come from far; they shall fly as the eagle that hasteth to eat. They shall come all for violence: their faces shall sup up as the east wind, and they shall gather the captivity as the sand.
Let me try to impose some modernness to these prophecies.
The Chaldeans are todays Wal-mart
For, lo, I raise up the Chaldean's, that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwelling places that are not theirs.
Wal-Mart takes over small businesses that wasn't theirs.
Their horses also are swifter than the leopards, and are more fierce than the evening wolves: and their horsemen shall spread themselves, and their horsemen shall come from far; they shall fly as the eagle that hasteth to eat.
The Eagle is America- Walmart has taken over America.
They shall come all for violence: their faces shall sup up as the east wind, and they shall gather the captivity as the sand.
Again domination of the small business in America.
While the disciples did ask two questions, they were related. The context was the same setting. In Matthew 24:34, Jesus told them that everything He had spoken in answer to both questions would be fulfilled within the lifetime of their generation.
I don't see where you think a 3rd temple is even implied. On the other hand, I see lots of explicit evidence that the only temples in the Bible are Solomon's and the temple rebuilt after the Babylonian exile. Since you accept implicit evidence, I suggest that there is plenty of implied support that the AoD did occur in the Herodian temple.There's PLENTY of implied Biblical support for a new temple. The "abomination of desolation" didn't occur in the old temple, so there MUST be a new one for it to occur in.