In another thread Brother Martin argued that it is wrong for us to “malign” Obama as a Marxist. To which I responded:
Following that Brother Martin took exception with my first sentence quoted above regarding Obama’s Marxist relationships and responded with:
Notice Brother Martin focused his refutation on only part of what I said above. He focused on Obama’s connections and associations and neglected to address Obama’s obviously Socialist political agenda.
Now consider what Winston S. Churchill had to say about Socialism and its connection with Marxist ideals:
Before we go any further those who oppose the idea of referring to Obama as a Socialist or Marxist must answer one question.
How many Socialist or Marxist ideals and/or policies regarding government must one espouse and/or support before it is acceptable to refer to them as a Socialist or a Marxist as opposed to a Capitalist etc.?
Bible-boy said:There is nothing wrong with pointing out Obama's relationships with Marxist people who influenced his thinking. There is nothing wrong with pointing out the Soicailst aspects of Obama's agenda.
Following that Brother Martin took exception with my first sentence quoted above regarding Obama’s Marxist relationships and responded with:
Martin said:Having connections and associations with someone does not equal agreement. I have connections and associations with conservatives, liberals, Christians, heathens, rednecks, intellectuals, liberals, conservatives, drunks, and family folks. Does the fact that I have connections/associations with all those different type people meant that I agree with them? No. In life we make connections and associations with all sorts of people but that does not mean we share the views of all of those connections/associations.
Notice Brother Martin focused his refutation on only part of what I said above. He focused on Obama’s connections and associations and neglected to address Obama’s obviously Socialist political agenda.
Now consider what Winston S. Churchill had to say about Socialism and its connection with Marxist ideals:
"It is part of the Communist doctrine and drillbook, laid down by Lenin himself, that Communists should aid all movements towards the Left and help into office weak Constitutional, Radical, or Socialist Governments. These they should undermine, and from their falling hands snatch absolute power, and found the Marxist State" (Churchill, Vol. 1, The Second World War, 212).
Before we go any further those who oppose the idea of referring to Obama as a Socialist or Marxist must answer one question.
How many Socialist or Marxist ideals and/or policies regarding government must one espouse and/or support before it is acceptable to refer to them as a Socialist or a Marxist as opposed to a Capitalist etc.?
Last edited by a moderator: