I have answered this before, but here it is again. You changed the term from drawing(the process, but not yet drawn) and the word "draw" as it is in the Scripture. It doesn't say, no man can com unless the Father is drawing him, it say no man can come unless the father draws him(which means to attract to cause to come). You were drawing the fish, but you didn't not draw it to you. If fell off. You failed at your drawing, you didn't draw the fish to you. My definition does work. But this example isn't the same as the one in the Scripture. This is more of the dragging definition. You are drawing the fish to you by it being attached to a hook. It isn't coming to you because it wants to as it is in John 6. Bad Example
The problem is, God himself said he "drew" the Jews in Hosea chapter 11, and then says they pulled away and backslid from him. So, your personal definition does not match up with the scriptures themselves. Something drawn does not always come to 100% completion, and the scriptures themselves show that.
And no Calvinist has answered the word "resist" when Stephen said the Jews always "resist" the Holy Ghost. What is the definition of resist?
Acts 7:51 Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye.
Strong's Concordance defines resist here as;
1) to fall upon, run against
2) to be adverse, oppose, strive against
Unless the Holy Spirit was attempting to draw these men, they cannot be said to be resisting. If God was simply passing by these men, not effectually attempting to draw them, they cannot be resisting.
If I hook a fish and try to draw it in, but it fights against me, it is resisting. But if I never hook the fish, or enclose it in my net, it cannot be said to be resisting me.
Calvinism teaches that God is not effectually calling or drawing the un-elect. Then how can they be said to be resisting? It is illogical. If God is not putting an influence on them, the unelect are not fighting or resisting God, they are just going about their business. If I walk past and ignore a policeman, is that resisting him? Of course not. But if he attempts to arrest me and I fight and try to get away, then I am resisting arrest. There has to be an influence or force upon you for you to resist.
Jesus said he was trying to gather the Jews as a mother hen tries to gather her chicks. This is showing action and purpose on God's part, he is not being inactive or passive in the matter. But they would not come, they resisted.
Matt 23:37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!
Gathered and gathereth here is defined as;
1) to gather together besides,
to bring together to others already assembled
2) to gather together against
3) to gather together in one place
You notice it says "to bring"? That is the same as drawing. God is actively trying to bring the Jews in, he is drawing them, calling them, putting influence upon them, but they resist and pull back.
And the scriptures even say unbelievers "draw back". Now, how could it say that unless they were being drawn?
Heb 10:38 Now the just shall live by faith: but if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him.
39 But we are not of them who draw back unto perdition; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul.
So, here you have the word "draw" being shown to mean resisting, to be pulling away.
You are playing word games, the scriptures show dozens of times that God is actively drawing men to himself, but some men resist and pull away.
