Tom Butler
New Member
bapmom, in your previous post you used the word "decision." That's another term that I think needs rethinking.
Tom
Tom
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Ron, could you give me scriptural examples of the sinner's prayer, and the verse or verses which say one must ask Christ into his heart in order to be saved?...say the sinner's prayer and ask Christ into one's heart..
What invitation on the day of Pentecost? Peter's sermon was interrupted by people obviously convicted by the Holy Spirit. They asked "what shall we do?" Peter's response was "repent."The invitation to come and accept Christ needs no refining. It sure didn't on the day of Pentecost and it sure doesn't now
That's exactly what I'm talking about (abiding in Him and bringing forth fruit). In my view, that's an excellent definition of decipleship.Originally posted by HankD:
Well when it comes to "doing" there is nothing I can do but abide in Him and bring forth fruit.
John 15:5 I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.
HankD [/QB]
I anticipated that a response similar to yours would come. My own daughter visited a service in my church in which the pastor simply closed the service without an invitation. She was upset. "Dad," she asked, "how can people be saved if you don't give an invitation?" Another question she asked: "What if there had been a lost person there who might have accepted Christ if there had been an invitation, but was killed in a wreck on the way home?"Originally posted by Tom Butler:
Ron said
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> I will ALWAYS believe in any form of an invitation to receive Christ at the close of a service
Ron, I know what the sinner's prayer implies. Properly used by a soul-winner, fine. Corrupted into some "repeat after me" magic words, not fine. I know one teenager who made a profession of faith when she was young, but is not now in church. Asked how could she be sure she is saved, her response: "I prayed the prayer."It is unfortunate that you do not know what the sinner's prayer implies or that your church does not lead the unsaved to praying it
Nit-picking from me here. Scriptural example, please of anybody praying with a lost person.The sinner comes forward and the counselor guides them and prays WITH THEM.
The proper response to a properly-preached gospel is not knowing what to say, but as the folks at Pentecost, "what shall we do?" Peter gave the answer, and it wasn't to say anything or pray anything. That said, expressing to God sorrow and repentance for sin, asking for His mercy, and expressing a trust in the finished work of Christ sounds good to me. It may be verbally expressed, but repentance and faith are essentially responses of the heart and mind, not necessarily of the vocal chords.A sinner does not know what to say, only that God has convicted him or her OF sin.
My pastor does, my fellow members do, have a burden for the lost. And we do have invitations. I speak only for myself, not my church.Tom, it is my sincere hope that you get out of the church you are in and get into a church that has a burden for lost souls. A church that invites the unsaved to come forward and receive Christ as their personal Lord and Savior. Believe me, you won't be sorry.
Nope. That's hyper-Calvinism and it's not biblical.A man called in and said that he was miserable with his life and wanted to become a Christian. Did Camping, staunch Calvinist that he is, help him in his search for the Lord? NO. He told this man that he would just have to wait to find out if he was one of God's elect. Is this anyway to treat an honest seaker?
Nope. That's hyper-Calvinism and it's not biblical. </font>[/QUOTE]My understanding was that hyper-calvinism was believing that God identified the elect who who have eternal life in heaven AND identified those who would go to Hell. I've always thought this was mere semantics since there are only two eternal destinies, Heaven and Hell. If you weren't chosen as one of the elect you would have only one other destination possible, Hell.Originally posted by Tom Butler:
Straight and Narrow said: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> A man called in and said that he was miserable with his life and wanted to become a Christian. Did Camping, staunch Calvinist that he is, help him in his search for the Lord? NO. He told this man that he would just have to wait to find out if he was one of God's elect. Is this anyway to treat an honest seaker?
My understanding of hyper-Calvinism (also known as Hardshellism) is fairly simple, although I know it's probably a bit more complicated. Basically this view holds to the same 5 points as regular Calvinists, but holds that people may be saved independently of the gospel. In other words, if you're elect, you're headed for heaven whether you ever hear the gospel or not. Calvinists and Arminians and all stripes in between appeal to I Corinthians 1:21, "it pleased God through the foolishness of preaching to save those who believe."My understanding was that hyper-calvinism was believing that God identified the elect who who have eternal life in heaven AND identified those who would go to Hell.
In this case the elders pray for a sick man who is healed and has his sins forgiven.Originally posted by Tom Butler:
Nit-picking from me here. Scriptural example, please of anybody praying with a lost person.
Tom B
Wait a minute Tom, I'm a non-Calvinist and I prefer your view. I would use the phrase "And none of His children will be lost" rather than use the word "elect".The Calvinist answer (and mine) was, and is, It is God who saves, and in His own time. And none whom He has elected will be lost. As Jesus prayed in John 17:6 "I have revealed you to those whom you gave me out of the world. They were yours, you gave them to me and they have obeyed your word
The non-Calvinist reponse would resemble your view. ."
Oh, OKThat's exactly what I'm talking about (abiding in Him and bringing forth fruit). In my view, that's an excellent definition of decipleship.
Glad you agree, and I'm curious. Am I correct in inferring that you believe in some kind of election, and that those whom God gave to the Son are certain to be saved? As a non-Calvinist, which of the 'nons' are you? Not looking for debate, just clarification.Wait a minute Tom, I'm a non-Calvinist and I prefer your view.