Originally Posted by Darrell C
Could you give your thoughts as to the resurrection of the two witnesses during the Second Woe?
I am wondering if you believe these come back to life in physical bodies and are caught up to heaven thus?
I do not believe that the two witnesses were men!
You don't?!
lol...just kidding. Believe it or not, I could probably detail what it is you believe, as I have debated with "Progressive Dispensationalists" that believe that the two witnesses represent Israel and the Church, the Old Testament and the New, basically.
I have a few problems with that, and I will just ask a few questions and hope for a reply And I will try to limit them for now):
Revelation 11
1And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein.
2But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.
In this event, we are again given a specific time period for the events to be fulfilled. First question:
How is it that if the two witnesses are merely representative of the Church and Israel, the Old and the New Testament (and really properly the Old and New Covenants), or even the picture presented in Zechariah of Priesthood and Kingship...how do we get past the specific timeframe?
3And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth.
Power is given to the two witnesses, that they should prophesy, for 3 1/2 years. Could this be said of any of the representative beliefs given above, or does it point to two literal men.
4These are the two olive trees, and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth.
In Zechariah 3 and 4, we see two literal men.
Why would we not see two literal men here?
Zechariah 4:14
King James Version (KJV)
14Then said he, These are the two anointed ones, that stand by the LORD of the whole earth.
In Zechariah we see similar terminology, and the two olive trees are two anointed ones, which I believe to be the kingly and priestly roles in Israel, In Zechariah, we see two literal men in these roles.
So why would we not see two literal men in Revelation?
5And if any man will hurt them, fire proceedeth out of their mouth, and devoureth their enemies: and if any man will hurt them, he must in this manner be killed.
Will those that dwell upon the earth be able to hurt "offices?"
Will the Offices, or if we view this to mean the Old and the New TEstaments, or Covenants even...do that described here? Apart from literal men standing, even as representatives of the concept given?
6These have power to shut heaven, that it rain not in the days of their prophecy: and have power over waters to turn them to blood, and to smite the earth with all plagues, as often as they will.
While we do see these powers ascribed to Old Testament prophets, have we seen them accomplished by the Church? And if we say that this happens at this time, will their still not be a need for someone to represent the Church?
7And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them.
What can this death refer to? How will the beast kill something that is not literal? Will he in fact kill the "two anointed ones?"
8And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.
Will the two anointed ones, if they are only representative of any of the ideas presented other than two literal men...actually be killed?
Revelation 11:3-4, KJV
3 And I will give [power] unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred [and] threescore days, clothed in sackcloth.
4 These are the two olive trees, and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth.
Do these two anointed ones only prophecy for 3 1/2 years, if they are interpreted to be something other than two literal men?
Is this a new concept presented in scripture, or can we see a correlation to Zechariah? And therefore conclude that the two anointed one have been around longer than the 3 1/2 years these two representatives are given?
It is reasonable, in my view, to see this as speaking of something other than two literal men, and I do. However, I also believe it is reasonable to see, according to the description of events, that two literal men will stand in these roles in literal bodies.
Revelation 11
8And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.
9And they of the people and kindreds and tongues and nations shall see their dead bodies three days and an half, and shall not suffer their dead bodies to be put in graves.
10And they that dwell upon the earth shall rejoice over them, and make merry, and shall send gifts one to another; because these two prophets tormented them that dwelt on the earth.
11And after three days and an half the spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them.
12And they heard a great voice from heaven saying unto them, Come up hither. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them.
While this can be spiritualized, and the two witnesses made something other than two literal men, my view holds that they are literal men standing as representatives of God and most probably the offices of King and Priest. But if they be not men, they will:
1-not have bodies which die, for whatever concept one sees this as representative, it is doubtful that they will "die," those those holding the offices do.
2-not be "left in the street for three days and an half."
3-not be called prophets.
4-have no need for bodily resurrection.
5-not be spoken to from heaven and called up.
I could expand on my understanding but doubt that you would agree.
I probably would not, at least not all points, but isn't that how discussion of doctrine works? I learn your views, you learn mine, and we discuss them.
Dispensationalists interpret Revelation totally different than I do.
Not just dispensationalists.
So far the best debate has been from Progressive Dispensationalists, in my view. Of course, the primary issue is whether the catching away is pre or post-trib. Love that dicussion.
Continued due to length...