• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Rightly Understanding Mark 16 Will End All Doubts as to Its Authenticity

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
Actually, only some "biblical Greek scholars" recognize a different writing style in the longer ending. The argument is that the longer ending of Mark uses some words that are used nowhere else in Mark. I don't have a problem with that. When the subject changes, the author has to use different vocabulary. On the other thread, I attached a short book of mine published in 1979 in which I use very different styes in Ch. 3-4 (hortatory) as compared to Ch. 1-2 (narrative). I'll attach that here in case someone is interested.

Dr. Maurice Robinson has done a comparison of Mark 1:32-39 with Mark 16:9-20, and the style and vocabulary of the two passages are very similar ("The Longer Ending of Mark as Canonical Verity," p. 69, in Perspectives on the Ending of Mark). Dr Robinson does this kind of comparison with a couple of other passages also--very convincing to me.
Thanks for the comments. I had never heard of Dr. Robinson’s comparison of Chapters 1:32-39 and 16:9-20. Very useful for study.

Not being a biblical Greek scholar myself, I will cede to your decades of study of which I find most impressive (if you will excuse the flattery)

Again, thanks for the input

Peace to you
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Lets see, Mark 16:9-20 uses a different style and vocabulary than found in the prior writings of Mark. This suggests someone else added the ending. However if I want to undercut that argument, I would point out that an author could adopt another style, say Luke, and incorporate some of his vocabulary. Seems like shoveling sand against the tide.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
From the Internet:
Scholars in Favor of the Longer Ending; Mark 16:9-20 is NOT Authentic

Bock, Darrell (1953-)

Bruce, F. F. (1910-1990)

Carson, D.A. (1946-)

deSilva, David A. (1967-)

Elliott, J. K.

Evans, Craig A. (1952-)

Fee, Gordon (1934-)

Geisler, Norman L. (1932-)

Gundry, Robert H. (1932-)

Guthrie, Donald (1916-1992)

Hooker, Morna D. (1931-)

Hort, Fenton J. A. (1828-1892)

Iverson, Kelly

Kelhoffer, James A. (1970-)

Kruger, Michael J.

Lightfoot, R. H. (1883-1953)

Marxsen, Willi (1919-1993)

McDonald, Lee Martin

Metzger, Bruce M. (1914-2007)79

Moo, Douglas J. (1950-)

Nix, William E.

Porter, Stanley E. (1956-)80

Schweizer, Eduard (1913-2006)

Stein, Robert H. (1935-)

Stonehouse, N.B. (1902-1962)

Strauss, Mark

United Bible Societies Committee

Wallace, Daniel B. (1952-
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
From the internet: Attributed to Metzger

The longer ending (vv 9-20) is clearly the most attested reading. It is validated by
almost all of the extant Greek manuscripts, a significant number of minuscules,
numerous versions, and scores of church Fathers. Geographically it is represented
by the Byzantine, Alexandrian, and Western text types. However, one should be
careful not to reduce textual criticism into an exercise of manuscript counting.
Though the longer ending is widely attested, the vast bulk of manuscripts are from
the generally inferior, Byzantine text type dating from the 8th to the 13th
centuries…​
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Greek New Testaments that completely omit the longer ending (LE) of Mark: None. Absolutely none, though several have it in parentheses.

Greek New Testaments that have the LE of Mark:

Erasmus TR
Stephanus TR (my edition is 1838)
M. A. Scholz edited NT
Beza (1598)
Elziver (1633)
Griesbach (1805)
Alexander Souter (1910)
Scrivener TR (1893)
Hodges and Farstad, The Greek New Testament According to the Majority Text (1st ed., 1982, 2nd ed. 1985)
Robinson-Pierpont, The New Testament in the Original Greek (2005)
McCollum-Brown, Solid Rock Greek New Testament (2018)

Have the passage in brackets:
Westcott-Hort, The New Testament in the Original Greek (1887 American ed.)
Nestle-Aland (editions 1-29, in brackets)
UBS (editions 1-4, in brackets)
 
Last edited:

Ben1445

Active Member
The simple truth of the command to be baptized in water to "be saved." First by our Lord Jesus. Mark 16:16. then by Peter in Acts 2:38.

Some sanity applied to this command.

God is a trinity, God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. Three in one and one in three. Co equal and co the same.

Israel, the nation, was baptized in water in connection with their national birth by the Father;

1 Cor 10:1 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;

2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;
______________________

In connection with the son when he came;

John 1:26 John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not;
27 He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose.

33 And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.
___________________

In connection to the coming of the Holy Spirit. It is doctrinal as it applies to salvation of the nation. Seventy eight times in 77 verses in the KJV Bible the phrase "in Christ" appears. The baptism by these men who have been given the authority of Jesus Christ himself completes the visual for Israel that God intends by this act of baptism. One would expect the number seven to be associated with this completion. Another number that is associated with national Israel is the number eleven. This is the number that falls short of God's perfect government, represented by the number twelve. Because of this falling short of every one of the nation to come, there is going to be a need for a purging, which is a baptism of fire that is scheduled for this people as prophesied here; See note below:

Matthew 3:11
I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance. but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you (#1) with the Holy Ghost,and(#2) with fire:

Note:
Acts 3:18 But those things, which God before had shewed by the mouth of all his prophets, that Christ should suffer, he hath so fulfilled.
19 Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord.
20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you:
21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.
22 For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you.
23 And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people.
24 Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those that follow after, as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days.
25 Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed.
26 Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.

If there is a lack of one being converted it will not work and the picture is not complete. The nation is pictured as the son of God. Ex 4:22 The son must be in the water and the water must be in the son.
John 4:14
But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life.

There have been 3 water baptisms for the nation Israel, one each by each member of the Godhead. There are visuals for the fire baptisms as well but that is for another post.
I know this is not exactly the thread topic but since you spent an entire post on it...
Are you saying that you cannot be saved without baptism, that the Holy Spirit is not given without baptism?
I am a Baptist and I am for Baptism.
But would you mind explaining why the order is this way here:
Acts 10:47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
Clearly they have the Holy Ghost and are not yet baptized.
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Scholars who hold that the longer ending of Mark is authentic:

David Alan Black
James A. Borland
Stephen L. Brown
John Burgon (Dean of Chichester)
Craig A. Evans
Arthur L. Farstad
Timothy Friberg
Paul A. Himes
Zane C. Hodges
Theodore Letis
Nicholas P. Lunn
Joey McCollum
Wilbur N. Pickering
William G. Pierpont
Maurice A. Robinson
Jakob van Bruggen

I could have listed many more. (This is my own list, not found on the Internet.) But what's the point? The number of scholars who hold to a position simply cannot prove the validity of the position. There are tons of scholars who hold to replacement theology, but that is clearly an erroneous theology.
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
However, one should be careful not to reduce textual criticism into an exercise of manuscript counting. Metzger
I agree somewhat with Metzger on this. However, if this is aimed at my post on Greek NTs, there is a huge difference between Greek manuscripts (hand written) and modern printed Greek NTs, which based on textual criticism rather than single specific manuscripts.

And likewise, the number of scholars holding to a certain view do not make that view correct.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I agree somewhat with Metzger on this. However, if this is aimed at my post on Greek NTs, there is a huge difference between Greek manuscripts (hand written) and modern printed Greek NTs, which based on textual criticism rather than single specific manuscripts.

And likewise, the number of scholars holding to a certain view do not make that view correct.
Yes, the fact that the most scholars believe Mark ended his gospel at verse 8 does not make them right or wrong. Ditto for the number of manuscripts with or without the LE.
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
I agree somewhat with Metzger on this. However, if this is aimed at my post on Greek NTs, there is a huge difference between Greek manuscripts (hand written) and modern printed Greek NTs, which based on textual criticism rather than single specific manuscripts.

And likewise, the number of scholars holding to a certain view do not make that view correct.
And how does this affect then how one views the bible itself, as boith those holding to a shorter or a longer ending will affirm same inerrancy, inspiration of the originals, that our translation are trustworthy etc?
 

JD731

Well-Known Member
I know this is not exactly the thread topic but since you spent an entire post on it...
Are you saying that you cannot be saved without baptism, that the Holy Spirit is not given without baptism?
I am a Baptist and I am for Baptism.
But would you mind explaining why the order is this way here:
Acts 10:47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
Clearly they have the Holy Ghost and are not yet baptized.
I will be glad to help.

I have received gift coupons through my E-mail box on my phone. Usually it says something like this; "if you will apply by phone within 3 days you will receive free of charge whatever it is that is offered." The gift would need to have some value or no one would be interested. I am supposing that if someone is offering whatever it is as a gift it is theirs to give. I am going to think I have done enough research on the gift offered to know if I desire to receive it. That is just the nature of a gift. There are conditions attached and sometimes more than one.

So here are some synonyms from the KJV that you need to be familiar with if you try to follow my logic and reasoning.

1)Eternal Life
2)Righteousness
3)The Gift of God
4)The Indwelling Spirit of God and Christ
5) Christ the son

These are all one and the same and the person who is in charge of all this is God the Father. He has secured these things through his only begotten son, Jesus Christ, when they are considered in the context of the gift of God.

Rom 8:32 He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things?
33 Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth.
34 Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.

If the NT teaches us anything it is that the gift of God must be received on the inside of us to do the things that these 5 things do and are. The one who offers the gift can set the requirements to receive it. So, in the case of God offering the gift to his covenanted nation to whom he exclusively promised the Spirit and eternal life and in preparation for the establishment of his righteous kingdom. For that to happen there had to be more conditions than just baptism in water and they are clearly stated in Acts 2 38.


36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made the same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ.
37 Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do?
38 Then Peter said unto them,
1) Repent, and
2 be baptized
3) every one of you
4) in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins,

and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Every one of the Jews who received the Holy Ghost will have met these conditions. If not, why give them? Do not those things and you will not receive the Holy Ghost to indwell you and give you life.

The establishment of the righteous kingdom over whom Christ will come back to reign must have all righteous citizens. It is God's righteousness they must have and it cannot be earned, it must be received from him and it must be an eternal part of them because his kingdom is eternal.

He says it again;


Acts 3:19 Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord.
20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you:
21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.
22 For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you.
23 And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people.
24 Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those that follow after, as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days.
25 Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed.
26 Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.

One cannot bless the whole earth if the foundation is not established first. There can be no righteous kingdom unless every soul has been made righteous and that is what the Spirit in a man does for him.

The fact is that in 7 years after the resurrection of Jesus Christ this nation as a people rejected Jesus Christ, only a few of many receiving him. It was then that God began broadening his offer of the gift to others besides Judah and Jerusalem. Read about it in Acts 7 and following. When he came to the gentiles in Acts 10 (40 AD) faith in the gospel of Jesus Christ, which the Bible labels simply as "the faith" is all that is required in order to receive the gift of God and be born of him.



43 To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.
44 While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.
45 And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.
46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,
47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.

For these gentiles baptism was after the had received the Spirit, eternal life.

One must honour and acknowledge the transitions of God in the scriptures. There are reasons for them. One nation has been chosen and birthed by God through which to make himself and his ways known to other nations and this nation has certain privileges as well as responsibilities the other nations and people do not have.

The ignorance about the ways of God puts men in the dark and they cannot see.


So, the first dealing of God after the resurrection of his son was with the foundation of his kingdom, Israel under the operative principle of keeping his covenant promises to them, which included giving them his Spirit. When they refused, God made a transition and began dealing with peoples who had no covenants with God and he dealt with us under his operative principle of grace. (Can you see why it would transition from promise to grace). In 70 AD he took away the kingdom status of Israel by taking away their national sovereignty by scattering them into the gentile nations and treating them as gentiles and as dead and buried nationally for the last 2000 years. But, like Jesus Christ who was two days in the grave and arose the third day, so will Israel.

Hosea 6:1 Come, and let us return unto the Lord: for he hath torn, and he will heal us; he hath smitten, and he will bind us up.
2 After two days will he revive us: in the third day he will raise us up, and we shall live in his sight.
3 Then shall we know, if we follow on to know the Lord: his going forth is prepared as the morning; and he shall come unto us as the rain, as the latter and former rain unto the earth.
 

Ben1445

Active Member
I will be glad to help.

I have received gift coupons through my E-mail box on my phone. Usually it says something like this; "if you will apply by phone within 3 days you will receive free of charge whatever it is that is offered." The gift would need to have some value or no one would be interested. I am supposing that if someone is offering whatever it is as a gift it is theirs to give. I am going to think I have done enough research on the gift offered to know if I desire to receive it. That is just the nature of a gift. There are conditions attached and sometimes more than one.

So here are some synonyms from the KJV that you need to be familiar with if you try to follow my logic and reasoning.

1)Eternal Life
2)Righteousness
3)The Gift of God
4)The Indwelling Spirit of God and Christ
5) Christ the son

These are all one and the same and the person who is in charge of all this is God the Father. He has secured these things through his only begotten son, Jesus Christ, when they are considered in the context of the gift of God.

Rom 8:32 He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things?
33 Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth.
34 Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.

If the NT teaches us anything it is that the gift of God must be received on the inside of us to do the things that these 5 things do and are. The one who offers the gift can set the requirements to receive it. So, in the case of God offering the gift to his covenanted nation to whom he exclusively promised the Spirit and eternal life and in preparation for the establishment of his righteous kingdom. For that to happen there had to be more conditions than just baptism in water and they are clearly stated in Acts 2 38.


36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made the same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ.
37 Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do?
38 Then Peter said unto them,
1) Repent, and
2 be baptized
3) every one of you
4) in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins,

and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Every one of the Jews who received the Holy Ghost will have met these conditions. If not, why give them? Do not those things and you will not receive the Holy Ghost to indwell you and give you life.

The establishment of the righteous kingdom over whom Christ will come back to reign must have all righteous citizens. It is God's righteousness they must have and it cannot be earned, it must be received from him and it must be an eternal part of them because his kingdom is eternal.

He says it again;


Acts 3:19 Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord.
20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you:
21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.
22 For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you.
23 And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people.
24 Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those that follow after, as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days.
25 Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed.
26 Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.

One cannot bless the whole earth if the foundation is not established first. There can be no righteous kingdom unless every soul has been made righteous and that is what the Spirit in a man does for him.

The fact is that in 7 years after the resurrection of Jesus Christ this nation as a people rejected Jesus Christ, only a few of many receiving him. It was then that God began broadening his offer of the gift to others besides Judah and Jerusalem. Read about it in Acts 7 and following. When he came to the gentiles in Acts 10 (40 AD) faith in the gospel of Jesus Christ, which the Bible labels simply as "the faith" is all that is required in order to receive the gift of God and be born of him.



43 To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.
44 While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.
45 And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.
46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,
47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.

For these gentiles baptism was after the had received the Spirit, eternal life.

One must honour and acknowledge the transitions of God in the scriptures. There are reasons for them. One nation has been chosen and birthed by God through which to make himself and his ways known to other nations and this nation has certain privileges as well as responsibilities the other nations and people do not have.

The ignorance about the ways of God puts men in the dark and they cannot see.


So, the first dealing of God after the resurrection of his son was with the foundation of his kingdom, Israel under the operative principle of keeping his covenant promises to them, which included giving them his Spirit. When they refused, God made a transition and began dealing with peoples who had no covenants with God and he dealt with us under his operative principle of grace. (Can you see why it would transition from promise to grace). In 70 AD he took away the kingdom status of Israel by taking away their national sovereignty by scattering them into the gentile nations and treating them as gentiles and as dead and buried nationally for the last 2000 years. But, like Jesus Christ who was two days in the grave and arose the third day, so will Israel.

Hosea 6:1 Come, and let us return unto the Lord: for he hath torn, and he will heal us; he hath smitten, and he will bind us up.
2 After two days will he revive us: in the third day he will raise us up, and we shall live in his sight.
3 Then shall we know, if we follow on to know the Lord: his going forth is prepared as the morning; and he shall come unto us as the rain, as the latter and former rain unto the earth.
So you are saying that you don’t have an answer for this exception to “the rule?”
 

JD731

Well-Known Member
So you are saying that you don’t have an answer for this exception to “the rule?”
Ben, I am sorry you did not see the point in the manner I addressed your question but I wanted to stay in the context of Mark 16. Acts 10 is not in the context of Mark 16 where Jesus is instructing his national leaders, the twelve and the seventy how to present his gospel to his nation who were in their land and city at that time. The covenants and prophecies concerning this people could have been completed during the apostolic time frame, which ended in 70 AD, a time period of 40 years from the resurrection of the King. This is a probationary time for the Hebrews. (see He 3). Jesus had said in Jn 3 that except a man is born again he cannot enter into his kingdom of God. The time for Israel to be saved was when Jesus died to redeem her and rose from the dead. He sent his Spirit to indwell them. Had they received the Spirit this would have been salvation for them.

A note about water baptism here. No one receives a drop of water into their bodies at baptism. Yet, water is a symbol of the Holy Spirit. In Acts 2 the scripture reads that the Holy Ghost was poured out from heaven in such abundance that he immersed all Israel. This had to be God's idea because who could have gone where he was and bring him down to earth? Each individual was admonished to be baptized in water which gives a visual of oneness with each other and with God. Israel is a corporate son of God, Ex 4:22, as well as individual sons of God when they put their faith in Christ. Thus it is a decision of the repentant sinner first (in Israel's case) to place himself in God, represented by the water, while it is God's decision to place himself in the repentant sinner in the person of his Spirit.

So, when we come to Acts 10 and the events of that chapter it is ten years after the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Israel did not receive the Spirit and salvation and in fact had rejected Jesus through their rulers. In those ten years there had not been a single salvation without a baptism because God had not yet opened the door of faith to gentiles until then. This was a transition, a change of God because of the lost condition of Israel When the first gentiles were saved in the home of Cornelius the Italian, there was no baptism preceding the giving of the Spirit to them as it had been for Israel. This was the surprise registered by these 7 Jewish men who were there to see it. Note what they said;

Acts 10:43 To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.
44 ¶ While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.
45 And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.
46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,
47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.

They had never heard that before.

Peter, in Jerusalem would explain this to the apostles and elders there that this was the event when God poured out his Spirit on the nations in such abundance that all could receive him.

Acts 11:15 And as I began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at the beginning.
16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost.
17 Forasmuch then as God gave them the like gift (this without the condition of baptism) as he did unto us, who believed on the Lord Jesus Christ; what was I, that I could withstand God?
18 When they heard these things, they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life.

A few years later during the contention with the law keeping Jews in Antioch, Peter would say this.

Acts 15:7 And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
8 And God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost, even as he did unto us;
9 And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.
10 Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?
11 But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they. (without baptism in water- there has been a transition).

The only way for men to be grounded in the truth is to believe every word of God's words and to follow his logic and reason. The minute something replaces it the light will begin to grow dim.

I encourage reading these scriptures in their context and meditating on them.
 
Last edited:

Ben1445

Active Member
Ben, I am sorry you did not see the point in the manner I addressed your question but I wanted to stay in the context of Mark 16. Acts 10 is not in the context of Mark 16 where Jesus is instructing his national leaders, the twelve and the seventy how to present his gospel to his nation who were in their land and city at that time. The covenants and prophecies concerning this people could have been completed during the apostolic time frame, which ended in 70 AD, a time period of 40 years from the resurrection of the King. This is a probationary time for the Hebrews. (see He 3). Jesus had said in Jn 3 that except a man is born again he cannot enter into his kingdom of God. The time for Israel to be saved was when Jesus died to redeem her and rose from the dead. He sent his Spirit to indwell them. Had they received the Spirit this would have been salvation for them.

A note about water baptism here. No one receives a drop of water into their bodies at baptism. Yet, water is a symbol of the Holy Spirit. In Acts 2 the scripture reads that the Holy Ghost was poured out from heaven in such abundance that he immersed all Israel. This had to be God's idea because who could have gone where he was and bring him down to earth? Each individual was admonished to be baptized in water which gives a visual of oneness with each other and with God. Israel is a corporate son of God, Ex 4:22, as well as individual sons of God when they put their faith in Christ. Thus it is a decision of the repentant sinner first (in Israel's case) to place himself in God, represented by the water, while it is God's decision to place himself in the repentant sinner in the person of his Spirit.

So, when we come to Acts 10 and the events of that chapter it is ten years after the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Israel did not receive the Spirit and salvation and in fact had rejected Jesus through their rulers. In those ten years there had not been a single salvation without a baptism because God had not yet opened the door of faith to gentiles until then. This was a transition, a change of God because of the lost condition of Israel When the first gentiles were saved in the home of Cornelius the Italian, there was no baptism preceding the giving of the Spirit to them as it had been for Israel. This was the surprise registered by these 7 Jewish men who were there to see it. Note what they said;

Acts 10:43 To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.
44 ¶ While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the word.
45 And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost.
46 For they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God. Then answered Peter,
47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then prayed they him to tarry certain days.

They had never heard that before.

Peter, in Jerusalem would explain this to the apostles and elders there that this was the event when God poured out his Spirit on the nations in such abundance that all could receive him.

Acts 11:15 And as I began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at the beginning.
16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost.
17 Forasmuch then as God gave them the like gift (this without the condition of baptism) as he did unto us, who believed on the Lord Jesus Christ; what was I, that I could withstand God?
18 When they heard these things, they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life.

A few years later during the contention with the law keeping Jews in Antioch, Peter would say this.

Acts 15:7 And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
8 And God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost, even as he did unto us;
9 And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.
10 Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?
11 But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they. (without baptism in water- there has been a transition).

The only way for men to be grounded in the truth is to believe every word of God's words and to follow his logic and reason. The minute something replaces it the light will begin to grow dim.

I encourage reading these scriptures in their context and meditating on them.
So it’s different for people at different times? The thief was not baptized and was still saved. The people Jesus healed who he told, “Thy sins be forgiven thee,” had no clear record of baptism. I do know that the disciples baptized as stated in John 4. But if it were that important to be baptized for salvation, wouldn’t there be a little bit more emphasis on it?
I personally have seen that when a person gets saved, they desire to be baptized. It seems like a matter of showing faith rather than having faith. Since we are saved by faith and not by faith and baptism, I disagree with the belief that baptism is necessary for salvation. If a person really believes Christ, they will want to follow Him and obey His commands. The first command to a believer is baptism. But I think that were someone not baptized, for whatever reason, they are not in danger of damnation solely on account of not having been baptized.
John 6:63
It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
 

Ben1445

Active Member
One day we will find out that the signature for the long ending that popped up in the 900’s was the equivalent of the modern day, “Kilroy was here.”
Does the fact that the ending is widely quoted before this notation have anything bearing on opinion?
Is there another reason besides the later 900’s note to justify the question?
Sorry if this doesn’t fit the narrative of your thread either.
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
And how does this affect then how one views the bible itself, as boith those holding to a shorter or a longer ending will affirm same inerrancy, inspiration of the originals, that our translation are trustworthy etc?
The difference is that most who are for the critical Greek text do not believe in a doctrine of preservation of Scriptures, while those who hold to the traditional text (TR, Byz, etc.) usually hold to a doctrine of preservation. Thus, Dr. Dan Wallace does not hold to a doctrine of preservation, but Dr. Maurice Robinson does.
 

Ben1445

Active Member
Acts Chapter 10

34​

And Peter opened his mouth and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:

35​

but in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is acceptable to him.

The Spirit where he willeth doth blow.
Given the Holy Spirit without being baptized is the point. I am not trying to turn one more thread into a will of God determinist thread whose purpose is not that.
JD731 said that the Holy Spirit is only given to people who are baptized. That was what sparked my comment.
Also, I am not sure if this teaching that the Holy Spirit is not given without baptism is supposed to affirm the long ending or if it is something else.
 

Ben1445

Active Member
The simple truth of the command to be baptized in water to "be saved." First by our Lord Jesus. Mark 16:16. then by Peter in Acts 2:38.

Some sanity applied to this command.

God is a trinity, God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. Three in one and one in three. Co equal and co the same.

Israel, the nation, was baptized in water in connection with their national birth by the Father;

1 Cor 10:1 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;

2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;
______________________

In connection with the son when he came;

John 1:26 John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not;
27 He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose.

33 And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.
___________________

In connection to the coming of the Holy Spirit. It is doctrinal as it applies to salvation of the nation. Seventy eight times in 77 verses in the KJV Bible the phrase "in Christ" appears. The baptism by these men who have been given the authority of Jesus Christ himself completes the visual for Israel that God intends by this act of baptism. One would expect the number seven to be associated with this completion. Another number that is associated with national Israel is the number eleven. This is the number that falls short of God's perfect government, represented by the number twelve. Because of this falling short of every one of the nation to come, there is going to be a need for a purging, which is a baptism of fire that is scheduled for this people as prophesied here; See note below:

Matthew 3:11
I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance. but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you (#1) with the Holy Ghost,and(#2) with fire:

Note:
Acts 3:18 But those things, which God before had shewed by the mouth of all his prophets, that Christ should suffer, he hath so fulfilled.
19 Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord.
20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you:
21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.
22 For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you.
23 And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people.
24 Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those that follow after, as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days.
25 Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed.
26 Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.

If there is a lack of one being converted it will not work and the picture is not complete. The nation is pictured as the son of God. Ex 4:22 The son must be in the water and the water must be in the son.
John 4:14
But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life.

There have been 3 water baptisms for the nation Israel, one each by each member of the Godhead. There are visuals for the fire baptisms as well but that is for another post.
The intent of this thread seems to be to use the Mark ending as a springboard for baptism necessary for salvation.
Is this the topic you are after?
Matt. 3:11 replaces the water of baptism with the Holy Ghost and fire. It does not replace the repentance with the Holy Ghost.
There is no parallel in this passage to being baptized for repentance and being baptized to receive the Holy Ghost.
If you are actually trying to discuss the canon and the textual author and authority of the end of Mark, I will start another thread.
 
Top