Rights of a Business or Employer- slippery slope?

[Two Wings]

Rep. Murphy: Concerns Over FDA Adviser Statements on Vaccinating Children

can FF to about 3 minutes to hear the congressman quote Rubin.

 

[Two Wings]

Rep. Murphy: FDA Adviser's Remark on COVID-19 Jab for Kids 'The Most Dangerous Statement I've Ever Heard in Medicine'

 

[Two Wings]

this isn't rumble

" While voting for the authorization, Eric Rubin acknowledged that it was “a much tougher one, I think, than we had expected coming into it.” He also said that “we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...nderstand-their-safety-heres-crucial-context/

 

[Two Wings]

yes, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin.

this isn't rumble either.

VIDEO RELEASE Sen. Ron Johnson: What is the Rationale for the Mandates? There is No Rationale

 

[Reformed1689]

this isn't rumble

" While voting for the authorization, Eric Rubin acknowledged that it was “a much tougher one, I think, than we had expected coming into it.” He also said that “we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...nderstand-their-safety-heres-crucial-context/

Excactly, not to mention kids have no need for the vaccine.

 

[JonC]

interesting.

we had a Dr. Ruben brief our union on this ... he said we needed to jab everyone to see what happens. I recognize you can't validate Ruben's brief to my profession's representative, but you CAN google his statement. How crazy is that? On the order of Pelosi's "gotta vote for it to see what it's in it" ACA bill nonsense.

This seems to be your operating MO. If it's on rumble, it's questionable at best because of past experience.

OK ... but do you understand why Rumble, Bitchute, Odessy, and a couple others I can't rattle-off right now have become increasingly popular? YT, Facebook, Twitter, et al have engaged in some radical censorship. The issue isn't whether they have the RIGHT to do so, but that they have and clearly there's another part of this story which isn't being told.

Would you believe testimony given to congress under penalty of perjury by "everyman" more or less than an entity which can stand to be paid literally billions for it's "answer" to the "pandemic" ... both ways; the disease of the virus AND the side effects of the cv vax.

I'm gonna give a participant the benefit of doubt. Perhaps the main witness in this is a scorned woman by some manager in Pfizer and she's completely biased in her testimony of her condition and that for which she had affidavits to include thousands of others.

I don't discount your statement of your outfits experience ...

but let's try to be objective. Pfizer wasn't, we know specifically how now ... and I knew they were blocking the results of these trials last year but I didn't know why.

Some of us have let our "want to" surpass our critical thinking skills.

Personly I wouldn't believe anything testified before or coming out of Congress. By the time it's there it has become political.

From what I have seen the pro-covid-vaxers and the anti-covid-vaxers are often a bit too dishonest. One side ignores the risks of vacci es while magnify the dangers of the virus while the other magnifies the risks of vaccines while minimizing the risks of the virus.

 

[Two Wings]

From what I have seen the pro-covid-vaxers and the anti-covid-vaxers are often a bit too dishonest. One side ignores the risks of vacci es while magnify the dangers of the virus while the other magnifies the risks of vaccines while minimizing the risks of the virus.

perhaps the truth is ... this was a bunch hogwash from the git go?

 

[Reynolds]

Excactly, not to mention kids have no need for the vaccine.

Kids will probably need 15 jabs before it's over.

 

[Reformed1689]

Kids will probably need 15 jabs before it's over.

And that is just before they get to high school.

 

[JonC]

perhaps the truth is ... this was a bunch hogwash from the git go?

I wouldn't say hog wash. I know several who have died of covid and a few who had very serious complications from the virus.

But I think both sides have politicized it and kept it going for their own agendas.

Otherwise it'd be like the measles virus and vaccine. Many would say the vaccine is dangerous, kills, causes mental issues, and does not work. Many would say it works. would require it, others would not. But all the hoopla would have died down.

Covid and the vaccines would not be the most presding issue on the political landscape and the issue would have remained within the sphere of medicine where they belong.

 

[nonaeroterraqueous]

But I think both sides have politicized it and kept it going for their own agendas.

Otherwise it'd be like the measles virus and vaccine. Many would say the vaccine is dangerous, kills, causes mental issues, and does not work. Many would say it works. would require it, others would not. But all the hoopla would have died down.

No, Jon, only one side politicized it. One side hyped the virus. The same side politicized the vaccine by mandating it.

The other side just wants to be left alone. The only agenda I can be faulted for is wanting to go on with my life as usual.

 

[Two Wings]

Covid and the vaccines would not be the most presding issue on the political landscape and the issue would have remained within the sphere of medicine where they belong.

now you're on to something.

there's big time stuff brewing and I don't know all of it, but I'm aware of a little bit ... and covid is a smoke screen ... a deadly one, both in the decision to put the infected among the barely-ambulatory elderly with multiple major comorbidities/susceptible and with the "answer" in the cv vaxes (among others; jabbing kids, all mask everywhere all the time, lockdowns, etc)

the gain of function did precisely what it was supposed to do ... disrupt ... cause division ... deceit ... and promote governmental consolidation.

 

[Two Wings]

Personly I wouldn't believe anything testified before or coming out of Congress.

So you think these witnesses are fabricating their testimony because they are giving it before Congress?

Or because it will short-circuit the entire narrative about the safety of the jabs as well as the process used to make that declaration?

 

[just-want-peace]

now you're on to something.

there's big time stuff brewing and I don't know all of it, but I'm aware of a little bit ... and covid is a smoke screen ... a deadly one, both in the decision to put the infected among the barely-ambulatory elderly with multiple major comorbidities/susceptible and with the "answer" in the cv vaxes (among others; jabbing kids, all mask everywhere all the time, lockdowns, etc)

the gain of function did precisely what it was supposed to do ... disrupt ... cause division ... deceit ... and promote governmental consolidation.

BINGO!!!!!
The USA is/was probably the sole pot hole on the road to one-world-gov't, & patching that pot hole is the job of the dem party!
Off hand I would say they are being successful, but people, to some extent anyway, seem to be waking up to the subterfuge plaguing the d party! One can only hope!!??

 

[JonC]

No, Jon, only one side politicized it. One side hyped the virus. The same side politicized the vaccine by mandating it.

The other side just wants to be left alone. The only agenda I can be faulted for is wanting to go on with my life as usual.

Wrong.

The DNC has also politicized both covid and the vaccine.

 

[JonC]

So you think these witnesses are fabricating their testimony because they are giving it before Congress?

Or because it will short-circuit the entire narrative about the safety of the jabs as well as the process used to make that declaration?

No. I think they may believe what they report. But that does not make it factual.

 

[JonC]

now you're on to something.

there's big time stuff brewing and I don't know all of it, but I'm aware of a little bit ... and covid is a smoke screen ... a deadly one, both in the decision to put the infected among the barely-ambulatory elderly with multiple major comorbidities/susceptible and with the "answer" in the cv vaxes (among others; jabbing kids, all mask everywhere all the time, lockdowns, etc)

the gain of function did precisely what it was supposed to do ... disrupt ... cause division ... deceit ... and promote governmental consolidation.

See. This is why Christians should avoid politics.

A GOP administeration gave us the three covid vaccines and declared covid a national danger. A DNC administration took over but adopted the prior stance on civid and vaccinations.

It's the Freemasons.

 

[Two Wings]

No. I think they may believe what they report. But that does not make it factual.

So I can call into question your personal testimony of salvation ... you may believe it to be so, but it's not really factual?

wow. You can certainly question their analysis of what happened to 'em (why they were removed from the vaccine trial), but how do you seriously question what they say happened to them as being anything but factual?

That's some beast-mode cognitive dissonance there, sir.

 

[Two Wings]

See. This is why Christians should avoid politics.

A GOP administeration gave us the three covid vaccines and declared covid a national danger. A DNC administration took over but adopted the prior stance on civid and vaccinations.

It's the Freemasons.

where did I indicate anything about political parties? it's bigger than that ... and it's bigger than the Freemasons.

 

[Silverhair]

And if you worked there for years and there was no set vaccination mandate and suddenly there is and now (pending firing) you must be vaccinated and you do not want to be because that particular drug is experimental and you do not want to have an experimental drug injected into your body what then? I can clearly see a rights violation case brought to trial here and I await the impending court cases.

And I can see the situation where the rights of one person do not outweigh the rights of the many. You are saying that the individual should have the right to do as they please. But if the employer has other people to worry about are we supposed to just say they have no right to a safe workplace?