Jarthur001
Active Member
I guess so Bob. It can happen when I'm not bull headed.Brother Bob said:Well, thank the good Lord James. Its Christmas time I guess so we agree.![]()
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I guess so Bob. It can happen when I'm not bull headed.Brother Bob said:Well, thank the good Lord James. Its Christmas time I guess so we agree.![]()
Jarthur001 said:Hello psalms109:31
OK..let me ask again. Where was wickedness found? Who put it where it was found?
Marcia said:I find this statement very disturbing. God does not change! If he could change his triune nature, he would not be God! An "integrated person?" God doesn't need to change to anything different - He does not change, according to the Bible.
Brother Bob said:Anyway, they were three before man and time, why would it change after time? He said, let us make man.
This is the typical knee-jerk reaction one would expect. Of course sin is the responsibility of the sinner, but that is still a secondary cause. The primary cause of all things is God. That's not blaming God, that's simply reality.psalms109:31 said:We did, it was not put in us we did on our own, lets put the blame where they blame goes.
You cannot blame the snake, the devil, the women God created, or God but ourselves.
It came from us. No one wants the easy answer, because they like to blame God
well...I would have to agree with this, being that it is in the Biblenpetreley said:Finally, the Bible simply says so. The LORD has created ALL THINGS FOR HIMSELF, yes even THE WICKED FOR THE DAY OF DOOM. Did He make them wicked by forcing them to sin? No. Men are wicked all on their own. Did He create them for a reason, all the while knowing they would be wicked? Yes.
As I said, the reason is stated clearly throughout the Bible, but most clearly in Romans. He makes known His power, longsuffering, justice, righteousness, mercy, etc., all because there is sin. We would see none of these attributes of God if sin did not exist.
Jarthur001 said:well...I would have to agree with this, being that it is in the Bible
This is the typical knee-jerk reaction one would expect. Of course sin is the responsibility of the sinner, but that is still a secondary cause. The primary cause of all things is God. That's not blaming God, that's simply reality.
The only way you can get around that fact is to pretend God was surprised when He found sin in satan, and surprised by Adam and Eve's disobedience. Otherwise He created satan KNOWING IN ADVANCE that iniquity would be found in him. If He knew, then He could have chosen not to create satan. And if he knew what would happen in the garden, He could have prevented it. The obvious fact that God did NOT prevent it, that God did not prohibit satan from entering the garden, shows that God ordained what would happen.
Finally, the Bible simply says so. The LORD has created ALL THINGS FOR HIMSELF, yes even THE WICKED FOR THE DAY OF DOOM. Did He make them wicked by forcing them to sin? No. Men are wicked all on their own. Did He create them for a reason, all the while knowing they would be wicked? Yes.
As I said, the reason is stated clearly throughout the Bible, but most clearly in Romans. He makes known His power, longsuffering, justice, righteousness, mercy, etc., all because there is sin. We would see none of these attributes of God if sin did not exist.
npetreley said:Okay, here ya go. I don't know how anyone could argue (convincingly) that God could not possibly have created beings without the ability or desire to sin. As far as we humans are concerned, only Jesus did not sin. So we're tempted to believe that any thinking being with a choice would sin sooner or later. But there has to be a reason why only SOME angels rebelled and others did not, eh?
Regardless, let's assume God could have created all beings without the desire or ability to sin. If God had created satan, Adam and Eve without allowing the desire/ability to sin, then sin would never have occurred, and the consequence would be that we would never really know Him or His glory. That's right. God deliberately allowed sin because sin (indirectly) glorifies God. How could we know anything of His wrath, righteousness, justice, mercy, longsuffering, and more unless there was sin? God has to allow sin and punish it in order to show His righteousness and justice. God has to have mercy on sinful creatures in order to demonstrate His love and mercy. Take away sin, and we have no way of witnessing these attributes of God.
Is this Biblical? You bet. Romans:
There you have it. It's all a part of His plan. God makes known His wrath, power, longsuffering, mercy, and more by enduring the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, and by saving vessels of mercy prepared beforehand for glory. Yes, the above is posed as a "what if", but anyone who reads the whole Bible will see it's not a hypothetical at all. God repeatedly says throughout the OT things like this: "I will raise up these wicked people to punish you, and THEN YOU WILL KNOW THAT I AM THE LORD". There you have a classic example of God raising up wicked people for the purpose of making His wrath, righteousness, power and glory known.
As Proverbs says, "The LORD has made all things for Himself, yes, even the wicked for the day of doom." Compare that to the above quote from Romans. He also says that He will place His law in our hearts so that we may love Him and live. And so we know His mercy and love.
Now, it may seem blasphemous to say that God ordained sin, even if He didn't force anyone to commit sin. The natural human reaction is to ask, if God did this because sin glorifies God, then why not sin all the more so God is even more glorified? Paul answered a similar silly proposal in Romans:
skypair said:Marcia,
God DID change -- or you wouldn't be saved, girl! God became a man, right? Where was the body of God before Jesus? What did He look like -- a embryo? Whatever He was, He became a "babe in swaddling clothes," did He not?
What you are talking about is His CHARACTER which NEVER changes.
But I will further submit this to you -- "integrated" He would be as He created us. That is God/soul, Spirit/spirit, and Jesus/body all in one. God divested Himself of His triune nature so that He could call a people to Himself. IS that as outlandish as you make it out to be?
skypair