• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Slowly moving my wife towards Reformed Theology from IFB theology

Status
Not open for further replies.

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
Andy Stanley????? No we need good theology served in a healthy diet of meat & vegetables. One cannot survive on candy based sermons such as ones by Andy Stanley. A good diet consists of good sermons from John MacArthur and Grace to You associated preachers.

Im sorry, but this a completely ignorant statement. To gain a good education of ANY view one needs to thoroughly study the opposing viewpoints. Half the problem on this board is this kind of thinking...I'll only surround myself with those I agree with and castigate the opposition as 'anti-biblical', 'candy based sermons', etc. I'm not a big MacArthur fan, but you know what? I own his study Bible. I listen to his sermons. I read his articles. As with anyone, I spit out the pit and eat the cherry. You (and many here) display spiritual immaturity by the above kind of post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Im sorry, but this a completely ignorant statement. To gain a good education of ANY view one needs to thoroughly study the opposing viewpoints. Half the problem on this board is this kind of thinking...I'll only surround myself with those I agree with and castigate the opposition as 'anti-biblical', 'candy based sermons', etc. I'm not a big MacArthur fan, but you know what? I own his study Bible. I listen to his sermons. I read his articles. As with anyone, I spit out the pit and eat the cherry. You (and many here) display spiritual immaturity by the above kind of post.
:thumbsup:

Unfortunately, it's rampant around here.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Did I miss your answer to this or.....

Hey Salty,

maybe you could show where a Nt church even has an altar...to do an unscriptural altar call with.....

Our Altar is the priestly work of Christ...in heaven..

10 We have an altar, whereof they have no right to eat which serve the tabernacle.

11 For the bodies of those beasts, whose blood is brought into the sanctuary by the high priest for sin, are burned without the camp.

12 Wherefore Jesus also, that he might sanctify the people with his own blood, suffered without the gate.

13 Let us go forth therefore unto him without the camp, bearing his reproach.

14 For here have we no continuing city, but we seek one to come.

15 By him therefore let us offer the sacrifice of praise to God continually, that is, the fruit of our lips giving thanks to his name.


walking to front of a building or the side of it does nothing.Jesus is in heaven now....the sinner can go direct to Him in prayer to find mercy...

proper confession of faith is believers baptism....

Finney thought by getting a person to move from one place or to another he was "moving" his will......

jn says;
13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.


There is no mystical power in the so called"altar call"

no more than this....

sinner if you want to be saved tonight,,,walk to the fellowship hall and eat some broccoli florets...it is an act of your will showing you want to saved..there is something about eating broccoli florets that shows you are sincere.
 

sag38

Active Member
Salty, here the deal. These folks think they have it all wrapped up in a neat tight little theological box. They arrogantly condemn anything or anybody who doesn't see it their way and they love to twist the scriptures. Best not to cast your pearls.......
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
OK, I'll play too.

Hey Salty,

maybe you could show where a Nt church even has an altar...to do an unscriptural altar call with.....

Show us where musical instruments are used in the NT church...to do unscriptural songs with...
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is truly unfortunate that the "altar call" replaced the inquiry rooms.

The original intent has long ago been misplaced.

Should a church hold an "altar call?"

I don't see it as "condemned" in Scriptures - the absence does not make it sinful.

Can the "altar call" be a tool?

I don't see why not. Are not the pulpit, the lights, the baptismal pool ... all tools?

How the "altar" is used, be it to lay the ordinances upon, or a term referring to one going into the inquiry room, or just making it to the prayer bench or steps to the pulpit, is not significant in itself. It is God's work - even believers are mere tools to His service.

Have "altar calls" been abused. Certainly.

Just as every other item - including the singing, preaching, clothing, media presentations, sound systems, instruments, carpet color, grand cathedrals, and massive assembly halls which exalt human engineering and contrive to distract from truth.

There is not a single item that has not been taken to sinful extreme and excess - not just the "altar call."

The "altar call" can be an effective tool.
 

Thousand Hills

Active Member
I agree with you, however how can I respect teachers in the IFB movement whom do not preach on SIN, and repentance, but instead preach a "God has a wonderful plan for your life" hook and sinker message at the Christmas service? The pastor did not mention sin, repentance, the Holiness of God, hell, judgment, or anything of the sort. Just a "God has a wonderful plan for your life" and then the alter call which led people to a prayer, but what did they repent from?? Why did they come to Christ? They came to better their life, not because they knew they were doomed to spend eternal judgment apartment from God. I cannot respect such sermons in such churches.

Evan, just a few weeks ago in another thread, you said this:

I desire peace. Yes I desire peace.... For the moment we will need to agree to disagree. I want to show the IFB that Reformed are more gracious and kind and not the divisive ones which belong to IFB. Reformed can be very kind and gracious.

After a chat I had with a former Reformed Baptist pastor of mine he says I should not make it a big issue. I listen to Charles Stanley, David Jeremiah, and Erwin Lutzer whom are not Reformed, so no need to be divisive with Arminian. These IFB are not KJVO nor do they believe one can lose salvation, so they are not automatic red flags.

I will become a member of the church as long as the pastor agrees to respect my Reformed theology in which he did.

http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=90524&page=9

If you say that you believe God is sovereign, and you believe he is in control, rest in that fact and learn what God wants you to learn at this time where you are. Maybe he is trying to show you something about yourself. Submit to God having you in this situation. In my opinion, your saying "I believe this, this, this..." but your being just as manipulative and taking it on yourself as much as those you condemn.
 

pinoybaptist

Active Member
Site Supporter
........... Sadly the IFB have blinded her about Reformed theology where she has thought negatively towards Calvinists, but that may change in time as she learns and gets exposed to more doctrine.

I have been a convert for 40 years, and have found that Baptists being as diverse as they are, there are IFB pastors who are antipathetic to other soteriologies because of (1) personal reasons, and (2) because they were grinded out of Calvinist-hating seminaries and did not take the time to investigate with an open mind and any investigation they made were to find fault, not truth.
On the other hand there are IFB pastors who take the view that Reformed theology are peopled with God's own, just like they are, and therefore they are a little kinder to the Reformed view, if not more open.
It is therefore not right to make a sweeping statement such as the one bolded.
Maybe most IFB pulpits you and your wife sat under were hostile, but certainly not all IFB pulpits will be, that is, if IFB's hold to the Autonomy of Local Churches.

I can't say that doctrine is very deep in our church and much of the teaching is very surface level......

you could almost be describing some Primitive Baptist churches I've gone to, you know.....you could preach about the Duck Dynasty and they won't know the difference. But they love the Lord, and they love each other, and those are the two MAIN divisions of the Law that the Lord Jesus taught.

The apologetics/evangelism is no question Arminianism based as most of what Focus on the Family & the IFB movement has produced. She says she does not have time for books so I cannot get her any good books by Reformed authors such as ones by Mac, Piper, Washer, Comfort, etc.. However she has lots of time to listen to sermons, and I am striving to get her to think outside of the IFB movement and the shallowness of most of their preaching.

Brother, forget about Mac and the Pipe and the Washer and too much Comfort.
Faith cometh by "hearing" is what Paul said, and the guy was a scholar in his own right.
Reading has its place, though.
But all in due time.

We had a discussion last night about the Sovereignty of God doctrine and I gave her the Reformed view, which in that view makes Satan a servant of God as Martin Luther said he is "God's Devil." Also in the Reformed view on Spiritual Warfare there is no need to read sensational books such as "This Present darkness" or others by Frank E. Peretti whom is teaching a very Arminian view of the topic. Yes he sells lots of books, but his teachings are not Biblical. Some in the IFB movement have endorsed this book, and the influences show up in our church, which I have highly rejected.

We need not reject something written and label it 'unbiblical' because its author belongs to this or that soteriological camp. Sometimes there are gems of scriptural wisdom or principles that can be found in the writings of those whom we might reject outright because of their soteriology, but that is, in my mind, wrong.
I've quoted illustrations from such diverse people as Swindoll, Jeremiah, Begg, Ravi Z, MacA.

She holds strongly to the IFB teachings on "tithing" which are unbiblical.

Personally I wouldn't call it "unbiblical".
Tithing is biblical, it is in the Bible. Old Testament. Not for the New Testament, though, where we are to give "according as God has prospered us".

When you go into debate with somebody whose thesis is that Jesus is a man, and say he is wrong, you're already done for, because the Bible says Jesus is a man.
You simply need to show why He is NOT JUST ANOTHER MAN.
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Who claimed that you could not learn from a Non Reformed book or teacher? Show where anyone said that.

My time in reading today I learned that I have made a graven mistake and that is not reading cover to cover the Gospel According to Jesus since I have owned the book in 1999. I started the book in 1999 and I am gonna finish it this time! Mac has been misunderstood, but clearly teaches that Justification and Sanctification must go hand to hand. There can be no justification without sanctification, otherwise you get people whom claim God IMPUTES his righetousness on them by saying a prayer they never meant. There is a multitude in todays day and even worse than it was in 1988 when Mac wrote the book.

But seriously can you not see God at work here man? I bought this book in 1999 and its the ONLY theology book that has survived since then. In fact it may be the only book besides the bible that has survived my many moves since that year. Is God not telling me something?
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Evan, just a few weeks ago in another thread, you said this:



http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=90524&page=9

If you say that you believe God is sovereign, and you believe he is in control, rest in that fact and learn what God wants you to learn at this time where you are. Maybe he is trying to show you something about yourself. Submit to God having you in this situation. In my opinion, your saying "I believe this, this, this..." but your being just as manipulative and taking it on yourself as much as those you condemn.

Great point as I did say that. I have and will remain at the church and will be patient. I get frustrated at times, however I dare say that I have been in Reformed churches in the past that were great at their doctrine and their evangelism, but horrible at relationships, showing love towards others, and where divisive in general. I remember a Reformed church in Redding, CA I attended for a season and they were very unfriendly and had a major church split when I left. Another Calvinist church the preaching was excellent, but the people were as rude and cold as Mr. Spock in Star Trek and so on. Reformed are excellent in their teaching and preaching, but sometimes need to learn to work together and at being friendly and kind.
 

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
My time in reading today I learned that I have made a graven mistake
A "graven" mistake? Hopefully it was not an indelible one. ;-)
and that is not reading cover to cover the Gospel According to Jesus since I have owned the book in 1999. I started the book in 1999 and I am gonna finish it this time!
He made some improvements in the second edition in 2008. He got some needed input from Michael Horton and others since the orginal edition.
But seriously can you not see God at work here man? I bought this book in 1999 and its the ONLY theology book that has survived since then. In fact it may be the only book besides the bible that has survived my many moves since that year. Is God not telling me something?
You need to put away your mystical tendencies.
 

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I remember a Reformed church in Redding, CA I attended for a season and they were very unfriendly and had a major church split when I left.
Boy! You are a significant person. If you had simply stayed there would not have been a split.
Another Calvinist church the preaching was excellent, but the people were as rude and cold as Mr. Spock in Star Trek
Fascinating. I think Mr. Spock was misunderstood. He actually had a heart beneath his half-Vulcan exterior.
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A "graven" mistake? Hopefully it was not an indelible one. ;-)

He made some improvements in the second edition in 2008. He got some needed input from Michael Horton and others since the orginal edition.

You need to put away your mystical tendencies.

I have the 2nd edition. What you are speaking about is the third edition. Whats so different about it?

1st Edition-1988
2nd edition-1994
3rd edition-2008
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Boy! You are a significant person. If you had simply stayed there would not have been a split.

Fascinating. I think Mr. Spock was misunderstood. He actually had a heart beneath his half-Vulcan exterior.

The church did not split over me, but over debates about certain doctrines.

Have you seen the season two episode where his father is having some major medical problems and he does not want to leave his duty nor assist his father? He also seemed very unconcerned with his father. Dr. McCoy referred to him as "cold blooded" and I would agree.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Salty, here the deal. These folks think they have it all wrapped up in a neat tight little theological box. They arrogantly condemn anything or anybody who doesn't see it their way and they love to twist the scriptures. Best not to cast your pearls.......

You are clueless at best.....Unbiblical at your worst.You make drive by statements like this,when someone answers you you run and hide rather than offer anything biblically. If you feel you have a biblical point than offer one.
The "theological box" that you disparage is what you lack for the most part.
You feel you have better theology offer it...I have not seen any "pearls" from any of your posts that i can recall.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Inspector Javert

Here is a person studying themself into the doctrines of grace...still learning as he goes and he is asking for advise on how to guide his household to be on the same page theologically.... and you offer this-
Translation:

I need advice about how to subtly and manipulatively influence my wife's convictions......

The poster did not use this language...he in fact asked;
Quote:
Originally Posted by evangelist6589 View Post
Fellow Reformed do you have any other ideas and or recommendations to offer that would help my wife? What moved me from the IFB ways was the teachings of Reformed that helped me see the light. However I was OPEN to suggestion and that made the difference.

God's grace is not, and never was truly sufficient to causally determine one's convictions.

While the poster is learning these truths himself he has not experienced watching God bringing many others to truth yet.Perhaps you have not seen this also or you would not twist or seek to put words in his mouth that suggest such an ungodly thought.

I, believe subtle tactics must be used in order to shape her view one way or the other.
Your Theology is ragingly inconsistent.
You fight God's will at every turn.

While someone is learning why would you not expect some inconsistency?
That you suggest he is looking for "subtle tactics" rather than some ideas from older believers suggests you are offering a less than noble help in your desire to highlight what might be inconsistent.

If God's grace is sufficient to teach her all things in his own time than he will, and he won't need your manipulation to do it.

So your suggestion is that a believer should not ask help from other believers....interesting...:confused: At least he did not read any Molinist ideas to confuse the issue.

But, you don't do that.

Calvinists rarely do.

Ah yes... we can feel your concern.

You lambast the "manipulation" of "altar-calls" and "Finney-ism" (or whatever the preferred zeitgeist is at the time) and then seek advice from fellow determinists about precisely how many verses of "Just as I am" are needed to manipulate your own wife into believing as you do while not seeming overly pushy.

Oh...so the noble inspector will defend Charles Finney now, by attempting to trash a young man learning as he goes.This despite the fact that later on in life Finney himself said that the supposed converts of his new measures were a disgrace and if he could do it all over again he would have never done it...and you like SAG38...know better than us mean cals..yes I see.:thumbs:

Let God be Sovereign and stop trying to "help" him, and it may be just fine. (If your Theology was sound)

This by itself might have been more on target if you suggested he wait upon the Lord after asking for advise.

...But you ask your own determinist brethren

Determinism is fatalism and not Calvinism. To say this is ignorant.

to help you manipulate her convictions in defiance of all you theoretically believe to be true, and they are MORE THAN HAPPY to oblige...

You like others here refuse to understand that God works through means.I believe you know better but to admit the same is to show you hold error.
Asking others is an accepted means.

The hypocrisy and inconsistency is manifestly obvious.

he is working through many issues ...yes....why so harsh?
B.T.W:
Just reading your posts, it sounds to me that she owns no less than every pair of pants in your presumptively Theologically sound family. Johny Mac may not have done you as good a turn as you think.

Again he is young and learning.If there is an element of truth here he needs others to help him along that line...not bludgeon him like a baby seal:thumbsup:

I married a die-hard Presby.....Calvinist Determinist who had the shorter Catechism memorized from age ten:

because she memorized the shorter catechism by age ten does not in and of itself show any work of the Spirit in regeneration.

you use determinist again showing defective thoughts on your part.If she was a padeo in truth she might not have married you with your credo view.

My tactic was simple:
tactic.....yet you lambast him for the same?

I handed her books, I told her to search the Scriptures for herself and didn't hear excuses about her being too slothful or lazy to read books.........(an excuse which apparently flies in your wife's case).

Not knowing these people personally We cannot make that judgement, however if this is the case....this needs to be prayerfully worked out, discussed , and approached biblically.I believe this to be a problem in many churches and families...the wife being the weaker vessel.

She converted from a lifetime of determinism

determinism is Islam.
and Calvinism to Bible-Believing synergism quickly enough
.

No real cal goes back....nope...not in reality.
By your own admission, you don't even rightly influence which Church your family attends, what they learn etc....

Legalistic fundys want only what they want...not the full revelation of God.

You have to "sneak-off" just to attend a Church of your preference?
That dog won't hunt dude.

This could be a bit of reaping what he sowed earlier on in His christian life.He is seeking to correct what he now see's as error without harming his wife or the other professed christians in that "church' Even if their theology is weak and pathetic...they are mostly still sheep so he needs to be careful not to harm them.He is not in an ideal situation.That is why he is asking all these questions in the first place:wavey:


You may think that you comprehend God's Sovereignty above all Arminians and what-not, but I can assure you of this:

You are no more the "Sovereign" in your own home than the man in the moon.

Then again if he is on the correct path he will overtake you who would rather explore fringe theology and mis-use you gifts.
Maybe someone other than Piper or Mac can help you figure out how that's done.

That is most likely the case. Frankly if he as head of His household just opens up the passages as they discuss life together she will by God's grace see it for herself.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Never said it was

No you did not say that....but you twice asked him this-

Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty View Post
Scripture does not mandate an altar call - but unless you can show me the Scripture that prohibits an altar call - then you are wrong in saying it is unbiblical.
Did I miss your answer to this or..

that is why I asked you where does a baptist church have an ....ALTAR..at all?

and what do you believe about the regulative principle?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulative_principle_of_worship
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top