Here we go again ... you are dead set on proving me a heretic, or worse. And while doing this, like Judith, you are not reading through what I have written. If you had you'd clearly understand that what I said is this:
How do those who vehemently support Dispensationalism versus Nondispensationalism know that their theory is of God or satan, or of man's frail inability to really grasp the end times according to what God says?
The same goes for Premillennialism, postmillennialism or amillennialism. There are at least three schools of thought, and when you add in the Disensationalist with the millennialist, the schools of thought grwo larger as do the gap or voids between what each side believes.
Then you have Calvinism and predestination[TULIP] versus the Free Will Baptist Doctrine that holds to the traditional Arminian position, based on the belief in a General Atonement, that it is possible to commit apostasy, or willfully reject one's faith. Faith is the condition for salvation, hence Free Will Baptists hold to "conditional eternal security." Many Christian denominations have been influenced by Arminian views on the will of man being freed by grace prior to regeneration, and many more hold to Calvinism.
I, for one, defintiely believe in my having free will to accept Jesus as my Savior, which I did in fact do on Christmas Eve, 1966...but somewhere along the way, I bought into the fact that like Calvinist believe, that nothing, but nothing can or will spearate me from the love of God. That my name has been recorded in the Lamb's book of Life, and that the blood in which it is written, cannot be erased, mainly because God does not have liguid paper in heaven! I am once saved, always saved, and I came to my salvation under my own free will!
Still, with all these difference of opinions within the Baptist congregations as a whole, according to you and Judith, one of these groups is not leaning on scripture; in fact they are leaning on false understanding and in turn they are false teachers, teaching a message that is not of God and if it is not of God it must be of the devil! Right? Or have I totally misunderstood you? Maybe that is why your number is disconnected? Because you do not want to hear anything other than what you have established as the truth according to you, and everyone else be cursed, or anathema?
That is the only reason that I said that no one really knows or has a definite answer to these questions or theories of theology, and because there is a failure to agree, and that failure results in separation of bodies of believers, then that is one more proof that not everyone knows, and that those that hold to theories opposite of yours TND, must be falsely led by false teachers and then these followers are for sure going to hell for following a doctrine other than what is the Gospel truth of God!!
Let me summize; You said - "If there is no harmony or peace in an action that is supposed to be a worshipful act, then it most assuredly is not from God.' Well I HAVE TO ASK - Is there truly HARMONY, within the collective body of Baptists? I say, there isn't and that leaves a lot to be explained, and according to you it is MOST ASSUREDLY NOT OF GOD [the lack of harmony or peace caused by the arguments over these doctrinal differences].
THEN you questioned the other brother when HE said, ""We cannot be certain if this is really from God??" Well, I ask you in all sincerity, can you be certain which one of the above theologies is really of God, and if it is [of God], than that must surely mean the other one aren't. So the ones you vehemently argue against, must not be of God, therefore those who adhere to these differences of opinions CLEARLY MUST NOT BE READING THE SAME BIBLE? And in fact must be of something, or someone else than God, and that leaves only the devil when we are talking about theology.
Then you say about me, "RD2's comment came directly from him, that when asked how he knew if this was from God, he said, "We can't!" And he said it with pride!". Have you suddenly been anointed with the gift of prohecy, or discernment? You must have as you boastfully proclaim that I said that in PRIDE? When in actuallity I said that is a spirit of sadness peppered with tremendous disappointment that there are so many differences between those who profess to be baptists, while in truth there is constant infighting over these doctinal issues.
no the truth from my lips and heart ... I really do not care one way or another if I was predestined or allowed to choose God by freewill. I do not care if time is under some for of dispenationalism, or whether the millennialism will be pre, post or mid. In fact the truth is a am a pure thinking panmillennialists ... in other words I believe everything will surely "Pan" out in the end! I have gone through this life carefully studying the teachings of many. Cautiously casting aside that which made no sense, or couldn't stan up to the scrutiny of His word; and I've allowed my theology to be completely influenced by the best of all worlds, and like I said, I don't care which group may be right and which grup may be wrong. Sadly it is totally disgusting that the churches on the face of this erth have decided to fight each other over trivial things like doctrines, when in fact sinners are still dying in their sin! If you think that is pride, may I suggest that you may be in a classic case of transference, transferring your own deepseated feelings over to me, because it is easier than believing you could be wrong!
I submit that each and every believer, when they get to heaven will find that God really had no preference over what you folks fight to make right. He is interested only, IMHO, in our willingness to witness, teach and make disciples of mankind!
No you have the rest of my story. And if you want to call me a heretic, may I suggest you look in a mirror and see that it may be a case of the kettle [you] calling the kettle, BLACK!? :thumbs: