Hope of Glory
New Member
Now, now, DHK, we wouldn't want to tempt the Lord by using our gifts as the signs for unbelivers that they are intended to be, now would we?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You badly misunderstand."Now, now, DHK, we wouldn't want to tempt the Lord by using our gifts as the signs for unbelivers that they are intended to be, now would we?"
Now, what kind of sign is that? Everyone knows he was bitten by the snake and it's verifiable. That was a sign. No one knowing about it would be keeping it a secret, not using it for a sign.We speak of the fact that christians have accidently eaten or drunk things that should have killed them...but they didnt die.
Then show me one case in which a person who had been given the power of healing had to simply "hope for the best". They always simply laid their hands on and healed.Originally posted by tamborine lady:
![]()
The gifts of the Spirit as shown in the Bible, and as used today are not "miricles on demand".
God is the author and finisher of our faith. He calls the shots, we just obey.
In love,
Tam
Mark 16:18 They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.Originally posted by D28guy:
You badly misunderstand.
We speak of the fact that christians have accidently eaten or drunk things that should have killed them...but they didnt die.
DHK and others are demanding that charismatics and pentecostals commit the sin of "tempting the Lord of God", by deliberately drinking Drano or poison in order to "prove" that we have that gift.
[/qquote]
No, rather I say you should take God at His Word. The Bible means what it says. Why are you trying to add to it? Or to change the meaning of it. Why are you afraid to take God's promises just as they are written? I will tell you why? The promise was not given to you. It was given to those that were living during the first century--the Apostolic Age.
Perhaps he was; or perhaps the snake was providentially put there by God to purposely bite Paul, demonstrating the power and protection of God upon God's elect. There are no accidents of God. The verse doesn't say accidentally.In spite of the fact that the divine protection is identified in scripture as happening when Paul accidently was bitten by a snake.
God prepared a whale for Jonah also; that was no mistake!
It is not a matter of tempting the Lord; it is matter of believing the God's promises. Do you believe them or not? The word acidentally is not in that verse. There is a reason why there are snake handling churches in this nation today. They believe that those verses apply for today. I don't agree with them; bucause I believe those verses were fulfilled in the first century. But if you beilieve they still apply today then you should have no problem drinking poision or taking up poisonous snakes such as others do in such churches without the excuse of saying that you are tempting the Lord.Fortunetly, we listen God and not folks like DHK and others, so we choose to not tempt the Lord our God as they want us to.
I am not the one disbelieving the promises of God. You are. You don't believe that God will keep you safe from that drano as God said he would. But of course those promises were for first century Christians only. That is why I have full confidence in them, and do believe them, in their proper context. I am sorry that you don't believe in the promises of God, and find that sad, very sad. Why do you doubt God so much?What a sad state of affairs to see christians demand that other christians literally sin grieviously...in an effort to justify that their disbelief, regarding Gods testimony.
Very very sad.
Mike
DHK
Originally posted by Hope of Glory:
It was purely by the spoken word by which this man was healed:Originally posted by tamborine lady:
[qb] Then show me one case in which a person who had been given the power of healing had to simply "hope for the best". They always simply laid their hands on and healed.
Acts 3:6-8 Then Peter said, Silver and gold have I none; but such as I have give I thee: In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth rise up and walk. And he took him by the right hand, and lifted him up: and immediately his feet and ankle bones received strength. And he leaping up stood, and walked, and entered with them into the temple, walking, and leaping, and praising God.
Jesus healed multitudes just by the spoken word. Rarely was there a laying on of hands. Only sometimes did Christ use that method.
DHK
The miracles of the Bible are not repeatable today. Will you please demonstrate how you can walk on water for us. Perhaps you can cause the sun to stand still, or make an iron axehead to swim? Can you raise a man like Lazarus who had been four days in the grave already--positive proof that he was dead. Can you restore a man's leg to perfect health who had been lame all of his life--let's say for around 37 years?Originally posted by tamborine lady:
The gifts of the Spirit as shown in the Bible, and as used today are not "miricles on demand".
That is correct. And in that respect study 1Cor.15:1-4. Obey the gospel, by the which ye are saved. The spiritual gifts can't do that, and they are not for today. Obey the Bible.God is the author and finisher of our faith. He calls the shots, we just obey.
You are quite correct. My error.Originally posted by DHK:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Hope of Glory:
It was purely by the spoken word by which this man was healed:Originally posted by tamborine lady:
[qb] Then show me one case in which a person who had been given the power of healing had to simply "hope for the best". They always simply laid their hands on and healed.
Acts 3:6-8 Then Peter said, Silver and gold have I none; but such as I have give I thee: In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth rise up and walk. And he took him by the right hand, and lifted him up: and immediately his feet and ankle bones received strength. And he leaping up stood, and walked, and entered with them into the temple, walking, and leaping, and praising God.
Jesus healed multitudes just by the spoken word. Rarely was there a laying on of hands. Only sometimes did Christ use that method.
DHK </font>
The Lord has used me at different times in at least 7 of the gifts of the Spirit. Tongues is the least of these, but some people get hung up on the little things.Originally posted by tamborine lady:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Rev. Lowery:
Just a question The Bible says prophesy is a greater gift than tongues. Then there is the gift of healing and raising of the dead. The Apostles all had these gifts because of the Holy Ghost. Why then if the gifts of the Holy Spirit are among us today do we only have one gift given. You would think out of the millions of Christians around the world at least 1 person would posses at least one of the other gifts of the Holy Ghost.
Bro Lowery no offence but the topic is tongues and the speaking of them. I tried on the version 3 of Tongues topic to answer Bro. Brian about raising the dead and then he turns around and tells me I was off topic for answering him. BTW, the man (in the link I posted) that was raised from the dead wasn't dead long enough for Bro Brian, nor was he embalmed yet cause people won't take a persons word for it. I didn't know there was CONDITIONS on how long a person has to wait before they can be raised from the dead or be healed or speak in tongues? What I do see is that they still are going strong. If not why do we hear of people getting healed, or comming back to life after being pronounce dead, or speaking in a unknown language only to be interpreted by another individual.Originally posted by Rev. Lowery:
No one ever answered my question about prophesy or healing. If we have the gifts of the Holy Ghost, why can no one demenstrate these gifts? why only the one gift of tounges? People seem to be able to perform this gift on demand. Why not the others? The Bible says Tounges are the least of the gifts so why would this be the only gift?
REv.Originally posted by Rev. Lowery:
Why is there no speaking in tongues after the apostles until present day movement no record in history or in churches. Why only one small group of Christians if I where to attend one of Benny Hinns sermons would I be slain because only he can cause the spirit to slay me can the spirit itself not do this why does the Holy Ghost need help? Why if the gift of tongues is still present does he need a translator when he speaks to Spanish speaking people? Why can a charismatic not witness to someone who speaks German if the gift of tongues is real today. When someone I know doesn't speak Icelandic witnesses to an Icelandic person in there language, with no previous knowledge of the language, then I will believe that the gift has not ceased.
No where does the Bible say that Tongues is the least of the gifts.Originally posted by Rev. Lowery:
No one ever answered my question about prophesy or healing. If we have the gifts of the Holy Ghost, why can no one demenstrate these gifts? why only the one gift of tounges? People seem to be able to perform this gift on demand. Why not the others? The Bible says Tounges are the least of the gifts so why would this be the only gift?
I have witnessed both healing and prophecy in many many meetings."No one ever answered my question about prophesy or healing. If we have the gifts of the Holy Ghost, why can no one demenstrate these gifts?
Its being mentioned more primarily because that is what this thread topic is."why only the one gift of tounges?"
They are Gods gifts. It is up to Him as to when and how they are manifiested."People seem to be able to perform this gift on demand." Why not the others?"
It isnt the only gift. All the gifts listed in the scriptures are being manifested in this day and age. And they have been manifested for 2000 years now, though sometimes less frequently."The Bible says Tounges are the least of the gifts so why would this be the only gift?"