When you can't refute the Scriptures I guess your only response is to attack the person. That is typical.
Ive already refuted you in great detail.....deal with it.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
When you can't refute the Scriptures I guess your only response is to attack the person. That is typical.
No, both heal today. However, there is a difference between God healing you and healers and the gift of healing. God is not bound to human instrumentality in healing anyone. The sign gifts were temporal whereas God's power to heal remains constant.
"Are you resisting the Holy Spirit"Ive already refuted you in great detail.....deal with it.
Boy, you are just not capable of seeing are you....again the gifts are not temporal & there is no scripture that testifys to it.
E,W,&F,
Why not be honest as to who you are.
Your profile says that you go to Hackettstown Independent Baptist Church.
I know that such a church would never endorse the sign gifts as operative for today. Hackettstown is a town in New Jersey. On one post you said you lived in New York. You don't sound like a very honest person. I doubt that you are even a Baptist, let alone go to an Independent Baptist Church. Your beliefs would not line up with their statement of faith. Is this correct?
I am not talking about a man who can heal headaches and stomachaches.
I am not talking about a church that makes all kinds of fanciful claims that cannot be verified.
I am speaking of a man that has the same power that Peter had, properly called, the gift of healing.
If there were such a gift today, with the presence of our media, the whole world would know about it. Any man that could attract all the sick in Jerusalem and in all the cities surrounding Jerusalem and heal them all without exception has a gift, a very supernatural gift. There is no one alive today that has that gift. If there was it would be a sure guarantee that we would know about it. If there was a single cure for all cancer patients we would know about it. But there isn't even that. But one man who has a cure for all diseases?? There doesn't exist such a person. If there does, show me one.
The gift of healing has ceased on that one point alone.
Acts 5:16 There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem, bringing sick folks, and them which were vexed with unclean spirits: and they were healed every one.
Any such similar scene, or an even on an equal footing cannot be replicated today. Demonstrate that it can.
I disagree that there are no persons who, on occaision pray for and see miraculous healing. I have seen healing after prayer -- sometimes things that are impossible. It is just not quite as spectacular and public as is often presented in Pentecostal circles. I don't see the miracle healers of today's world as actually having the gift they profess, or if they do have it they are sure not using it the way they ought, for we have hospitals crammed with sick and dying persons that remain un-healed.
I see no end to the giving of spiritual gifts, even the spectacular ones, but I also do not see those gifts being used in Scripture as loosely (and for personal gain) as I do in certain circles today. I have friends who have the true gift of tongues. They seemingly learn a language by simply speaking it, and they use their gift in the service of world missions. I know people who have the gift of giving, and I've been (PTL) the recipient of some of their gifting from time-to-time. In fact, I probably wouldn't be here today if not for some of those gifted people that God used at precisely the right moment to help a poor starving seminary student feed his family. We don't get to watch the people with the true gifts perform on television in front of packed stadiums... But God uses them in isolated cases to advance the kingdom and further the gospel, just as always.
I don't disagree with this brother. I believe in a God that heals, and have seen God heal. Today he heals primarily as an answer to prayer. There is no such thing as "faith-healers." Neither is there no such thing as "the gift of healing," today.I disagree that there are no persons who, on occaision pray for and see miraculous healing. I have seen healing after prayer -- sometimes things that are impossible.
Agreed.It is just not quite as spectacular and public as is often presented in Pentecostal circles. I don't see the miracle healers of today's world as actually having the gift they profess, or if they do have it they are sure not using it the way they ought, for we have hospitals crammed with sick and dying persons that remain un-healed.
But it wasn't given supernaturally, was it? William Carey never claimed to have the gift of tongues. He didn't believe it was for today. Carey was only a cobbler, one who repaired shoes. He was self taught. He went to India, against the will of his church, and there translated the Bible, or portions thereof into 44 different languages. He never claimed to have the gift of tongues. But God did give him a talent which he did use.I see no end to the giving of spiritual gifts, even the spectacular ones, but I also do not see those gifts being used in Scripture as loosely (and for personal gain) as I do in certain circles today. I have friends who have the true gift of tongues. They seemingly learn a language by simply speaking it, and they use their gift in the service of world missions.
God gives each of us talents and abilities that He expects us to use. But they are not on par with the supernatural gifts of the Spirit described in 1Cor.12-14.I know people who have the gift of giving, and I've been (PTL) the recipient of some of their gifting from time-to-time. In fact, I probably wouldn't be here today if not for some of those gifted people that God used at precisely the right moment to help a poor starving seminary student feed his family. We don't get to watch the people with the true gifts perform on television in front of packed stadiums... But God uses them in isolated cases to advance the kingdom and further the gospel, just as always.
May I ask you how you know that such are not "lying" signs (2 Thes. 2:9; Mt. 24:24)? How do you test the spirit behind them?
I disagree that there are no persons who, on occaision pray for and see miraculous healing. I have seen healing after prayer -- sometimes things that are impossible. It is just not quite as spectacular and public as is often presented in Pentecostal circles. I don't see the miracle healers of today's world as actually having the gift they profess, or if they do have it they are sure not using it the way they ought, for we have hospitals crammed with sick and dying persons that remain un-healed.
I see no end to the giving of spiritual gifts, even the spectacular ones, but I also do not see those gifts being used in Scripture as loosely (and for personal gain) as I do in certain circles today. I have friends who have the true gift of tongues. They seemingly learn a language by simply speaking it, and they use their gift in the service of world missions. I know people who have the gift of giving, and I've been (PTL) the recipient of some of their gifting from time-to-time. In fact, I probably wouldn't be here today if not for some of those gifted people that God used at precisely the right moment to help a poor starving seminary student feed his family. We don't get to watch the people with the true gifts perform on television in front of packed stadiums... But God uses them in isolated cases to advance the kingdom and further the gospel, just as always.
Simple! Do they further the Gospel or not? Do they cause the recipients to declare that Jesus is Lord?
Where is the Scriptural evidence for this? Can you verify it, or is it just your imaginative philosophy?Now the Spirit came upon people in this matter of prophesy & if they did not respond or if others discouraged them from responding then that quenched the Spirit.
Where is the Scriptural evidence for this? Can you verify it, or is it just your imaginative philosophy?
BTW, do your beliefs line up with your church's statement of faith?
You said:What do you mean?
What do you mean by this statement? Where in Scripture does the Spirit come upon a person, and if they do not respond or if others discourage them from responding then the Holy Spirit is quenched. Please give evidence for your statement. Remember I mentioned before. Don't make a statement without expecting to be challenged. Be prepared to be able to back up what you say with Scripture. I believe what you say is unscriptural. Here is your chance. Show me from Scripture what you say is true.Now the Spirit came upon people in this matter of prophesy & if they did not respond or if others discouraged them from responding then that quenched the Spirit.
Because in large part they were not "signs." God was asked. God answered. God was praised. No one knew but the ones acting, praying, and seeing. Oh, and there is no "every time" nonesense. The healing is nothing more or nothing less that expressed in Scripture. Asking God in Jesus name, and waiting to see if He would or would not bring healing. When He did, there was much cause for praise, and His kingdom was advanced. No one "profited," no one gained fame, no one helped, save for the faith of those involved and the life of the one healed.
Same for the giving and the speaking... These are true ministers of the gospel, not showy, public, persons looking for self-gain.
It is not that it could happen....it can "All things are possible from God. It is the strangulation of the possibilities that is disconcerting. In 1 Thessalonians 5:19-21 it "QUENCH NOT THE SPIRIT. Despise not prophesying. Prove all things; hold fast to that which is good. Sound advise from Scripture to be sure.
Now the Spirit came upon people in this matter of prophesy & if they did not respond or if others discouraged them from responding then that quenched the Spirit.
2 Cor. 12:12 Truly the signs of an apostle were wrought among you in all patience, in signs, and wonders, and mighty deeds.
If such things are the signs of an apostle, how can anyone argue they are the common property of believers? If that were the case then how could they be "signs" of the apostolic office if every child of God possessed these in the same sense?
We have plenty of Biblical evidence that the apostles did convey such gifts to the common believer through the laying on of their hands:
Ac 5:12 And by the hands of the apostles were many signs and wonders wrought among the people; (and they were all with one accord in Solomon’s porch.
Ac 6:6 Whom they set before the apostles: and when they had prayed, they laid their hands on them.
Acts 8:17 Then laid they their hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost.
18 And when Simon saw that through laying on of the apostles’ hands the Holy Ghost was given, he offered them money,
19 Saying, Give me also this power, that on whomsoever I lay hands, he may receive the Holy Ghost.
Ac 19:6 And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied.
2Ti 1:6 Wherefore I put thee in remembrance that thou stir up the gift of God, which is in thee by the putting on of my hands.
Rom. 1:11 For I long to see you, that I may impart unto you some spiritual gift, to the end ye may be established;
Heb. 2:3 How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him;
4 God also bearing them witness, both with signs and wonders, and with divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost, according to his own will?
2 Cor. 12:12 Truly the signs of an apostle were wrought among you in all patience, in signs, and wonders, and mighty deeds.
I find the "free expression" of possibilities problematic. I've been in the midst of people who were "prophesying" in a Pentecostal manner. They were speaking outright lies that I knew were lies. I halted the practice, as it was happening within my own church during a visit of another church on mission. I see the biblical expression of prophesy as speaking forth the words of God. That does not give license for someone to come up with the wildest possible crud to speak (in God's name!). We speak what God first said, and the gift is true. When we speak anything else (new revelations) we might also then want to apply the test of a true prophet and be prepared to stone to death those who speak falsely. Ready for the test?