Texas and secession

[Use of Time]

Nope. I'm even less OK with slinging around the slur "racist", which you use freguently, called for or not, as in this case.

So you have a problem with people calling someone a racist even if it is called for? What? Nevermind I don't care. I would still love to see your rationale for that unwarranted accusation to go2church.

I see you went after me because we have a history but you avoided correcting Alcott. What unmitigated courage. You are such a moral compass. Thank you so much.

 

[carpro]

You are such a moral compass.

As you are.

 

[Use of Time]

As you are.

I do what I can. :wavey:

 

[Alcott]

Defending the use of any slurs, whatever the nature of the slur, comes from a heart lacking in the compassion necessary to reflect the light of Jesus and carries one far from the heart of God.

You mean the heart that called the ruler of the province they were in a female fox? or the people he spoke to generation of vipers?

If there are about... 3 or more... requests, I will edit that earlier post and the change the word I used to "zorras" [since that can't be a 'slur'].
''

 

[go2church]

Funny. Reads like you are defending the use of a slur, yourself.

Thus the "careful", lest you be guilty of what you accuse others of. Alas, it's too late.

You're lack of accuracy and comprehension is noted.

 

[go2church]

You mean the heart that called the ruler of the province they were in a female fox? or the people he spoke to generation of vipers?

If there are about... 3 or more... requests, I will edit that earlier post and the change the word I used to "zorras" [since that can't be a 'slur'].
''

Don't forget whitewashed tombs. Also, don't forget, those are not racial slurs.

 

[carpro]

Don't forget whitewashed tombs. Also, don't forget, those are not racial slurs.

Neither is wetback. Not racial at all.

 

[go2church]

You mean the heart that called the ruler of the province they were in a female fox? or the people he spoke to generation of vipers?

If there are about... 3 or more... requests, I will edit that earlier post and the change the word I used to "zorras" [since that can't be a 'slur'].
''

But it would be offensive, but for an entirely different reason.

 

[go2church]

Neither is wetback. Not racial at all.

Got some neighborhoods you can visit, test your theory about it not being racist.

 

[Use of Time]

Got some neighborhoods you can visit, test your theory about it not being racist.

:laugh: Yeah no joke. Anyways, just realize you are going back and forth with someone whose logic consists of gems like this.


"I'm even less OK with slinging around the slur "racist", which you use freguently, called for or not, as in this case."

I'm still trying to unpackage that one.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

Get outside, folks.

 

[carpro]

You're lack of accuracy and comprehension is noted.

As is your hypocrisy.

 

[carpro]

Got some neighborhoods you can visit, test your theory about it not being racist.

Some Hispanics may consider it an insult, but it is not racial at all.

 

[go2church]

Yes, it is insulting and racial. You're in Texas, shouldn't take long to find out.

 

[carpro]

Yes, it is insulting and racial. You're in Texas, shouldn't take long to find out.

Find out what? That Hispanics are caucasian, same as me? I already know it.

Actually I can call them anything I want to and it wouldn't be racist. But they might take exception to an insult. As anyone would. So I'll refrain from calling them wetbacks as long as they don't call me pendejo.

So save your race card slur and use it somewhere it might have some meaning. This ain't the place.

 

[go2church]

Find out what? That Hispanics are caucasian, same as me? I already know it.

Actually I can call them anything I want to and it wouldn't be racist. But they might take exception to an insult. As anyone would. So I'll refrain from calling them wetbacks as long as they don't call me pendejo.

So save your race card slur and use it somewhere it might have some meaning. This ain't the place.

Call them ANYTHING and it wouldn't be racist? You sure about that? ANYTHING is a very broad category.

I'm not sure what a race card slur is, but calling an insulting AND racist remark insulting AND racist is using accuracy, not using a slur.

If you don't like it, stop defending the use of insulting AND racist remarks.

 

[carpro]

I'm not sure what a race card slur is,

Calling someone a racist is a slur, one you are apparently OK with. Hypocrite.

A little education seems to be in order considering your ignorance on the subject.

There are 3 races. Just 3. Caucasian, negroid and mongoloid. Hispanic ain't in there. They are considered caucasian. There are some 5000 ethnic groups of which hispanic is one. Now every one of those 5000 groups might like to consider themselve a "race", but that don't make it so.

So if you're going to slur people by calling them a racist, at least have an idea what you're talking about.

Have a nice day. I'll give you 36 hours to digest that. You seem to be a slow learner.

 

[go2church]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alcott View Post
You know, most of the other wetbacks don't look like that guy in the picture.

Attempt at humorous comment failed, though you nailed racist comment perfectly.


You see from above, called the comment racist. Also said using such remarks and defending their usage doesn't reflect the light of Jesus, which it doesn't.

You have been arguing that it can't be because Hispanic people aren't a race. So, grab your dictionary, sociology book and let's head out to a couple of neighborhoods, see how that goes for you. Better yet, next time your at work, why don't you start throwing the term around?

Wouldn't do that you might say, don't want to insult people. Well, it's clear you're not above being insulting people so the hesitation must come from some place...I wonder what that could be?!?

 

[Use of Time]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alcott View Post
You know, most of the other wetbacks don't look like that guy in the picture.

Attempt at humorous comment failed, though you nailed racist comment perfectly.


You see from above, called the comment racist. Also said using such remarks and defending their usage doesn't reflect the light of Jesus, which it doesn't.

You have been arguing that it can't be because Hispanic people aren't a race. So, grab your dictionary, sociology book and let's head out to a couple of neighborhoods, see how that goes for you. Better yet, next time your at work, why don't you start throwing the term around?

Wouldn't do that you might say, don't want to insult people. Well, it's clear you're not above being insulting people so the hesitation must come from some place...I wonder what that could be?!?

Notice how he is all about the racist slur thing while he ignores Alcott's slur against an entire group of people. That is pretty telling. As usual the point went right over his head. He simply doesn't have the courage to take to task someone that is usually on his side idealogically. It's pretty cowardly.

 

[carpro]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alcott View Post
You know, most of the other wetbacks don't look like that guy in the picture.

Attempt at humorous comment failed, though you nailed racist comment perfectly.


You see from above, called the comment racist.

You really should have taken more time.

Since you intend to be willfully ignorant, you have officially joined the ranks of the other race mongers we have here, making yourself a hypocrite in the process.

Big day for you. :applause: