That brings up another point.That...
I'll need to see where the Lord said that.
That He was always going to be responsible for the penalty incurred by the sins of God's elect.
Not just the sins, but the penalty for them.
Since "Penal Substitutionary Atonement" consists of God's supposed wrath also being laid upon the Lord Jesus on the cross, then I want to see where the Scriptures absolutely declare this.
Otherwise, my friend, to me it's based upon inference... and not clear-cut declaration.
Also:
If it were so important, I would think Paul would have written about it to the churches and told them that God's wrath was also laid upon His Son on the cross for them.
Why do we twist truths into different forms?
What is wrong with the wages of sin, or simply that sin produces death, to refer to the consequences produced by sin and God's judgment against the wicked for the "day of wrath:?
What I mean to point out is sin producing death is a consequence, not a penalty.
And God's Judgment against the wicked is nit exactly for sins (it is because they reject the Light, which they do because their deeds are evil).
The reason I ask is saying "the penalty for sins" seems to minimize that "the Father judges no one" and "all judgment has been given to the Son". It seems to minimize Christ, at least in how I am reading the wording.
Maybe it would be simpler (at least more plain, less baggage) to just call things what God called them. That way anybody can easily reference the passages without having to decode the theology used. It also forces people to go to Scrioture and perhaps to avoid talking past one another.