• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Commander in Chief is Killing our Marines

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I do give you a break, Pastor Mitchell. I think that you mean well.

Well that would be nice if it is true. however your error is lumping those who support defense in with all the other government expansion. Defense is constitutional, all the others are not, defense is limited to defense, all the others intrude on peoples freedom. I respect the antiwar ideology until it works to intentionally misrepresent those who support defense. Sorry but it is just dishonest.
 

KenH

Well-Known Member
I respect the antiwar ideology until it works to intentionally misrepresent those who support defense. Sorry but it is just dishonest.

On that you and I are in total agreeement.

I have enjoyed the discussion. Have a nice evening. :)
 

BigBossman

Active Member
After watching 60 minutes, there is no doubt Obama is killing our troops by handcuffing them with rules of engagement that have deadly consequences for our troops.

Obama has endorsed a counter-insurgency strategy that may or may not work , but is dangerous to the safety of our combat troops.

One thing is certain, this strategy requires more boots on the ground. He knew that when he endorsed it. While he plays political footsie with the anti war loons of his own party, our troops are dying in greater numbers because he won't make a decision on how many to send.

If he sends less than needed, he will condemn more of them to die unnecessarily with his rules of engagement.

This almost sounds like the rules they had in Vietnam. There was some U.N. rule to where the enemy could shoot at us, but as long they were beyond a certain point, our soldiers could not fire back. All they could do was duck & cover. That was probably one rule that caused us to lose that war.

It wouldn't surprise me if Obama goes to the U.N. for help. This will be a stupid move. It will further endanger our troops over there. The fact that he is taking so long to weigh the options only proves that he is totally inexperienced in foreign matters. He should listen to his generals since they are what I would consider to be experts in military combat.
 

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
He should listen to his generals since they are what I would consider to be experts in military combat.
Unfortunately, this policy, for the most part, ended with Truman during WWII.

Our military accomplishments, again, for the most part, reflect this too!
 

alatide

New Member
Some people will incorrectly cite the number of civilian causalities during war in way that implies they are entirely America's fault and the result of our careless or wanton acts. That's wrong! Millions of people did die in World War II but the majority did so at the hands of our enemies or as a result of our necessary response to our enemies' aggression.

Others will demand unreasonable rules of engagement that can prolong a war, multiply the risk to our combatants, and give aid to the enemy who hides behind them. That's also wrong! Reasonable rules are a way to enforce the principles of just war. Unreasonable rules are an impediment to just war and lead to more injustice. It also contributes to lowered morale and incites more illicit acts of retaliation out of frustration.

It's my belief and experience that America has shown far more concern and compassion for civilians caught up in a war than any other nation, probably more in many cases than the armed forces of our allied host nations, and certainly much more so than our enemies who often have no regard whatsoever.

By the way, Obama's biggest priority for the military seems to be to make it "okay" for homosexuals to serve openly. That's just plain foolish but it will probably get him another bogus award not unlike his Nobel "peace" prize!

Unlike WW2, the United States started the war in Iraq by invading Iraq. Blame for civilian causalities rests primarily (not totally) on the country that started the war. by the same token, I would primarily place the blame for civilians killed during WW2 on Nazi Germany and Japan. Do you agree?
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
This almost sounds like the rules they had in Vietnam.

Nixon's holiday truces were very similar, maybe even worse.

Holiday truces were a farce during which the NVA had complete run of the country unmolested.

Meanwhile, 6 man Marine recon patrols were sent into the DMZ and along the Loatian border with no artillery support and no air cover.

When they observed the NVA moving large units in broad daylight, they couldn't call in artillery. When they were located and attacked by the NVA, they died. The plan was not to be located.
 

Dragoon68

Active Member
I place blame for civilian casualties of war upon the enemy that is in the wrong. That, so far, has never been the United States of America.

So, therefore, no I do not agree that the America is to blame for civilian casualties in Iraq. Instead, Saddam and his supporters are to blame for that. His aggression in the first Gulf War, his failure to comply with inspections afterward, and his own saber rattling lead to his ultimate demise. No, America did not "start" the war in Iraq - that's completely incorrect.

I still think we were totally justified in what we did in Iraq and I think both America and Iraq are better off because of it. I think those who have served in that war deserve the honor of knowing their cause was a just cause as was their implementation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Dragoon68

Active Member
Remember, also, that our enemy in Viet Nam took advantage of the Tet holiday to launch a major offensive. We soundly defeated them, by the way, although you wouldn't know that from most history books. Most of our enemies don't "play by the rules" but, being the honorable people that we are, we at least try. Why we focus so much on the few exceptions to our good conduct I can only surmise is part of an attempt to discredit the far greater exemplary conduct of our military forces.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

alatide

New Member
I place blame for civilian casualties of war upon the enemy that is in the wrong. That, so far, has never been the United States of America.

So, therefore, no I do not agree that the America is to blame for civilian casualties in Iraq. Instead, Saddam and his supporters are to blame for that. His aggression in the first Gulf War, his failure to comply with inspections afterward, and his own saber rattling lead to his ultimate demise. No, America did not "start" the war in Iraq - that's completely incorrect.

I still think we were totally justified in what we did in Iraq and I think both America and Iraq are better off because of it. I think those who have served in that war deserve the honor of knowing their cause was a just cause as was their implementation.

Has America ever participated in a war in which you believe we were in the wrong in your view? In other words, is America the other nation in the history of the world that is always in the right? Why are we perfect and all those other nations imperfect. I suspect it's due to accepting the following:

"My country, right or wrong."
 

Dragoon68

Active Member
Yes I think America has been on the right side of every war we've ever fought so far. I think America has been very blessed in its history so far. But, of course, with the changing attitudes about her - the desire to condemn her and lower her standing among other nations - I wonder if in the future the Lord will continue to be so kind to us.
 

alatide

New Member
Yes I think America has been on the right side of every war we've ever fought so far. I think America has been very blessed in its history so far. But, of course, with the changing attitudes about her - the desire to condemn her and lower her standing among other nations - I wonder if in the future the Lord will continue to be so kind to us.

Does God look at America differently from other countries? Is that what's behind our being perfect? What in the Bible supports that view? My reading of the Bible tells me that only Israel is special in God's sight.
 

Dragoon68

Active Member
God has greatly blessed America as is self-evident from all that we have enjoyed in our relative short period of history. We'd best guard it well and remain always grateful to Him that provides it. This has nothing to do with the Biblical implications of the nation of Israel in the Old Testament. People from every nation are among His chosen people today. But not all of them are blessed to live in a land as great as ours. This is not because we, as individuals, are superior to others because all men are born in the same sinful state. It merely means that America, for reasons that please Him, has been greatly blessed in modern history. All history - all the greatness of this earth - will pass away some day and be replaced with the true and final greatness of Him. Until then I pray that we and our descendants may enjoy life is such a blessed nation as ours and be an example for others. It is our duty to protect her for as long as we live.
 

Nonsequitur

New Member
This is 2009, not 1944.

Civilized people do not as easily go along with the idea of killing civilians during battles as they did 65 years ago.

Like it or not, but that's a fact.

Is that why we were treated to the shots of Islamic people laughing, and dancing in the streets after the Twin Towers?
Are you saying they are not 'civilized people'?
Or are you saying the scenes we were shown were faked?
 

Nonsequitur

New Member
Has America ever participated in a war in which you believe we were in the wrong in your view? In other words, is America the other nation in the history of the world that is always in the right? Why are we perfect and all those other nations imperfect. I suspect it's due to accepting the following:

"My country, right or wrong."

If the draft is ever brought back, why do you worry?:tongue3:

And on the second note.....when have you EVER defended this country in all of your posts?
 
Top