Featured The New Eve; "the mother of my Lord" [Luke 1:43]

I said the world, Christ is in heaven.

That Vanity is the same answer we get from self-proclaimed prophets, self proclaimed poombahs, popes and self proclaimed saints.

Everyone believes their own pope and only God has a better understanding then themselves.

Give me the name of one person who has better understanding than you.

Name ONE LIVING PERSON in the entire world who has a better understanding of Christianity THAN YOU DO.

I said the world, Christ is in heaven.

Do you believe religious nuts are real? Cultists Crazy wanabe prophets who think they only got it right . They come a dime a dozen here.

You can probably do a search of me asking this question they all say God/Jesus. And none agree with each other.



Name ONE LIVING PERSON in the entire world who has a better understanding of Christianity THAN YOU DO.

Lets hear it. Can anyone top you as a saint?

 

Human DNA did not affect Jesus because God is without sin and Jesus lived a human life. He was the seed of the woman.

Do you believe that Mary is the co-redemtrix?

 

Okay, thanks for the answers.

Jesus assumed the physical characteristics of Mary so that He resembled her. However, Jesus is God eternal so He was not harmed by her attributes. Since His birth is a miracle because Joseph is not his physical father, part of the miracle is the Incarnation itself. Mary is the greatest woman ever to live but she was not the most beautiful as Eve was perfect when created. Mary had a couple of lapses off the top of my head. She and Joseph took Jesus to Jerusalem and forgot and left Him there. What kind of mother is that? Call welfare. Secondly, she requested the wine at the wedding when Jesus said that it was not His time.

Co-redemtrix is not dogma, as you know.

It is thought that Mary died in 48 AD according to New Advent. The wages of sin is death.

Is the Pope considered the king of the earth?

 

That "queena hevvin" jive comes from the "mystery, babylon" religion created by Nimrod & Semiramis. They simply replaced Semiramis with Mary.

 

MMRRPP! WRONG!

There's but ONE redeemer & mediator between God & man, & that's JESUS.

 

Some Christians think that Nimrod is Sargon of Akkad. See how quickly men reverted to evil immediately after the Noahic Flood

 

Nimrod was, according to Scripture, a founder of Akkad, so Sargon may have been his descendant. semiramis was Nimrod's wife, and there are some legends that she was his mother. (However, I've found those stories to likely be apocryphal.)

Semiramis was the founder, with Nimrod's help, of the "mystery, Babylon" religion. She became queen of Babylon after Nimrod's death, & continued as head of her religion, taking on the title "queen of heaven". She was the "queena hevvin" some Jews of Jeremiah's time made cakes in honor of, & burned incense to. Her son by Nimrod, Tammuz, was the one the Jewish women of that time wept for. That religion continued on in various forms, & some early RCs likely simply switched Mary with Semiramis to make their baloney more-acceptable.

There's absolutely NO Scripture ascribing perpetual virginity to Mary, (That idea likely came from early Christians who'd previously worshipped Athena or Minerva.) nor any assigning her as co-redemptrix or mediatrix with Jesus. (Likely, more "mystery, Babylon" jive. Remember, mystery, babylon is assigned to the harlot of Rev. 17.)

The only thing extraordinary about Mary was that she bore Jesus while still a virgin.

 

"Jesus assumed the physical characteristics of Mary"

Whoa whoa whoa.

You making it sound like Jesus teleported into his mother's womb. or entered and she is just a untraditional surrogate.

Angel says to Mary:

Luke 1

31“And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall name Him Jesus.


SHE WILL CONCEIVE. Jesus will conceive? Joseph will conceive? Holy spirit will conceive? God will conceive?

YOU WILL CONCEIVE is MARY.

And Even MARY says how is that going to happen I am a virgin. Mary is empowered.


34Mary said to the angel, “How can this be, since I am a virgin?” 35The angel answered and said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy Child shall be called the Son of God. 36“And behold, even your relative Elizabeth has also conceived a son in her old age; and she who was called barren is now in her sixth month. 37“For nothing will be impossible with God.” 38And Mary said, “Behold, the bondslave of the Lord; may it be done to me according to your word.” And the angel departed from her.



"may it be done to me according to your word."

Also SHE agreed to comply.


I'd like to hear the rundown of when Mary is "SAVED" at all. Cause even down to her AGREEMENT she never had the holy spirit. was never saved. and plenty of you would write off as totally depraved.

 

The last several posts demonstrate how the Catholic Church's Marian dogmas safeguard orthodox Christology and Trinitarian theology. Those are the first things to go as soon as one starts attacking the Mother of God.

 

Seems you do not know the Holy Scriptures
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I referred to Revelation 17:v.9-10~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.
10 And there are seven KINGS: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space. (That is 42 months, no more, no more)

Who are these 7 "Kings"? The 7 kings are a lineage of Popes.

But why does Revelation call these leaders and religious guides of the Roman Catholic Church as "kings"? Remember: The things revealed in the book of Revelation were written around the year 95, the function or the title "Pope" was not yet used at that time, understand?

And who are these 7 "kings" , and what are the NAME of each one of them in the religious hierarchy of the idolater Church of the Beast, the Roman Catholic Church?

I will say who are them and their NAMES as follow:

These 7 "Kings" are of a lineage of Popes nicknamed as Paulus, as follow:

Paulus I - 29 May 757 – 28 June 767 - (10 years, 30 days)

Paulus II - 30 August 1464 – 26 July 1471 - (6 years, 330 days)

Paulus III - 13 October 1534 – 10 Nov 1549 - (15 years, 28 days)

Paulus IV - 23 May 1555 – 18 Aug 1559 - (4 years, 87 days)

Paulus V - 16 May 1605 – 28 Jan 1621 - (15 years, 257 days)

Paulus VI - 21 June 1963 – 6 Aug 1978 - (15 years, 46 days)

Paulus VII - This seventh "king" and last Pope is not yet come; and when he cometh, he MUST continue a short space, i.e. 42 months or 1,260 days, no more, no more, as it is determined by the written Word of God-Revelation 13:v.5-, the Word is God, do you understand?

Note: We are in the year 2,019 in accord Christian calendar. The prophecy of Revelation is very advanced in the time, today we can and MUST say that the above SIX of the 7 "kings" have fallen, it means, they already died. And are destined to eternal perdition, to the hell's fire.

IN THE OTHER HAND, I see that you are the one who like to do calculations like these in your post.

Speaking of math and calculations, don't you happen to know who the Man or the Beast is whose number by his name is counted six hundred threescore and six? 6 ......... 6 .......... 6

See, many students and speculators say that this Beast "666" is the Pope, because he presents himself as Vicarivs Filii Dei, 666 in Roman numerals. In addition the Beast has 7 heads represented by 7 hills, and plus 10 horns, so, it is a religious MONSTER, and students and speculators say they are the 7 hills of Rome - Vatican City. I desagree of these two theories.

These two exemples are mere coincidence, they do not represent the true reality;

Firstly because "Vicarivs Filii Dei" is not a name of a Man, it is a religious functional title;

Second the 7 mountains or hills of Vatican City where the Beast-the Pope- is enthroned as the ruler and guide of the Roman Catholic Church, the Woman, the Great Whore, which rides upon the Pope -the Beast- yes, the 7 hills of Rome represent not at all the territorial size of the physical and religious structural extent of the Roman Catholic Church. The territorial and spiritual structures of the RCC is sat in whole earth.

Actually the 7 mountains are based specificaly in the 7 regions of the earth, not only in Rome, ie in Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania (Australia), North America, and Central America, and South America.

There is a deep detail: In the year 95, date of the book of Revelation, only the regions of Europe, Asia and Africa were known, therefore, the regions Oceania (Australia), North America, Central America, and South America, were not known as they are today, the biblical description is prophetic, do you understand?

In a while, believe you or not, you will receive a signal on your right hand or forehead to make your purchases. No one can buy or sell unless he has this sign on his right hand or forehead, or the NAME (with surnames of parents at his birth) of the Beast, or the NUMBER of his NAME.

Evidently is about the name and surname of this MAN or this Beast, given by the parents at birth, and as for his number is 6 ..... 6 ..... 6.

I see that you are the one who like to do calculations like these in your post, and you can find hundreds or thousands of names or titles like "Vicarivs Filii Dei" that result falsely in 6 .... 6 .... 6 or suggest to, but we must not forget that only A NAME is true, knowing that the number of his name is six hundred three scores and six - 6 ..... 6 ..... 6 .

Who is this religious Beast? Remember: This Man is not the Pope.

PROBLEM:
What is the name (first and last name) of the Man translated from the number six hundred and threescore and 6 ---> 6 .... 6 .... 6 <--- which according to the Bible identifies and indicates who is the Beast? Rmember, the 666 is not the Pope.

I am waiting not only from you, but everyone who wants to participate in solving this issue. Thanks

 

"...you are obliged ..."
Not this Child of God!

Was Mary sinless? Was Mary without sin? | GotQuestions.org
To help bolster their teaching that Mary was sinless, the Roman Catholic Church has invented the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception (formally accepted as Catholic dogma in 1854). According to this false teaching, Mary was, from her very conception in her mother’s womb, “preserved free from all stain of original sin.” That is, Mary had no sinful nature. This doctrine is neither biblical nor necessary. The virgin-born Christ Jesus was free from the stain of original sin, but it was not necessary for His mother to be—or His grandmother—or His great-grandmother, etc. How far back would we have to go to insure Jesus’ perfection, if it were necessary for Mary to be sinless?

 

I really can't take you seriously. I suppose that you are like Rick Warren, who said that if you like Jesus, then you will like Pope Francis.

 

Thats because satan worshippers ignore everyone unlike themselves. Runs in their biggot blood. Like nazi who won't acknowledge anything a jew says. Basic Evil.

 

Don't be so hard on yourself. Probably you went to a public school and didn't learn how to discuss issues so you resort to vulgarity and absurdity.

 

If you went to a private school, perhaps you should inquire about a refund. (The sentence underlined above is grammatically incorrect.)

 

There was no vulgarity, absurdity or insult in what I said. I apologize if you are taking it the wrong way.

 

"...date at which time all Catholics are obliged...". I am glad you limited the obligation to Catholics.

Was Mary Sinless?
"If Mary never sinned, why did God give the high priesthood of the church to Jesus instead of her? In fact, the declaration of the Hebrews writer would lose its power if someone else had already achieved sinless perfection.

Mary herself acknowledged this great doctrinal truth, i.e., that all have sinned and are in need of a Savior. She declared: “And my spirit has rejoiced in God my Savior” (Luke 1:47, emp. added)."

 

Exactly what the Catholic Church teaches! You do not understand the word 'mediatrix'. You are equivocating it with the ONE REDEEMER & MEDIATOR, Jesus Christ.