Featured The New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)

But the basic truth is still valid!

 

Niv was a good translation, while

revision was made worse!
Still same answer, as

 

Well, that's your opinion, not fact.

 

You are simply amazing at not answering direct questions.

 

True, but think formal gives to us overall better accuracy...

 

This is my 4th attempt to get Y-1 to answer the above. But he has been cowering in the corner afraid to reply to a simple question that exposes not only his history of false charges against the NIV, but his basic inconsistency.

 

I have been looking for why Niv missed Jesus in Psalm 8!

 

Y-1 is cowardly in not answering a straight-forward question. Could it be that to answer honestly would expose his lack of integrity for more than a decade?

 

No, as your view on the Niv 2011 is akin to trying to have KJVO admit problems in the Kjv!

 

Yes, you are certainly cowardly because you don't have the simple courage to answer a very basic straight-forward question. Your lack of integrity is preventing you from doing the right thing. You twist and turn, as usual, in a vain attempt to change the subject. You are squirming away which is your normal way of operating.

 

You still keep on defending the part of the Niv that did not need to get revised!

 

This is now the 5th time I have asked Y-1 to answer the simple question above. But it is not his nature to be honest and face his fictions.

 

You are right here. The author of Hebrews would disagree with the NIV as well.