But the basic truth is still valid!
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)
- Thread starter alexander284
- Start date
Niv was a good translation, while
Still same answer, as
revision was made worse!This is now the third time I have asked the question above that Y-1 is studiously avoiding.
Still same answer, as
Well, that's your opinion, not fact.Yes, having several is good, but formal should be the primary one!
You are simply amazing at not answering direct questions.Niv was a good translation, while revision was made worse!
Still same answer, as
True, but think formal gives to us overall better accuracy...Well, that's your opinion, not fact.
This is my 4th attempt to get Y-1 to answer the above. But he has been cowering in the corner afraid to reply to a simple question that exposes not only his history of false charges against the NIV, but his basic inconsistency.And so? Is that news?
By the way, since it uses more inclusive language than the NIV or the TNIV and NLT --why haven't you made up any fairy tales about it extolling female pastors and heads of homes and all the other junk you attribute to the NIV?
I have been looking for why Niv missed Jesus in Psalm 8!This is my 4th attempt to get Y-1 to answer the above. But he has been cowering in the corner afraid to reply to a simple question that exposes not owhy the Niv missed jesus in Psalm 8!nly his history of false charges against the NIV, but his basic inconsistency.
No, as your view on the Niv 2011 is akin to trying to have KJVO admit problems in the Kjv!Y-1 is cowardly in not answering a straight-forward question. Could it be that to answer honestly would expose his lack of integrity for more than a decade?
Yes, you are certainly cowardly because you don't have the simple courage to answer a very basic straight-forward question. Your lack of integrity is preventing you from doing the right thing. You twist and turn, as usual, in a vain attempt to change the subject. You are squirming away which is your normal way of operating.
You still keep on defending the part of the Niv that did not need to get revised!Yes, you are certainly cowardly because you don't have the simple courage to answer a very basic straight-forward question. Your lack of integrity is preventing you from doing the right thing. You twist and turn, as usual, in a vain attempt to change the subject. You are squirming away which is your normal way of operating.
This is now the 5th time I have asked Y-1 to answer the simple question above. But it is not his nature to be honest and face his fictions.By the way, since it uses more inclusive language than the NIV or the TNIV and NLT --why haven't you made up any fairy tales about it extolling female pastors and heads of homes and all the other junk you attribute to the NIV?
I have been looking for why Niv missed Jesus in Psalm 8!
You are right here. The author of Hebrews would disagree with the NIV as well.