Clearly the reason why the Puritans sailed across the pond...I was afraid to post this for fear some here might just burst a blood vessel, but in England (where proper English is spoken), they refer to their magistrates (judges) as, "Your worship."
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Clearly the reason why the Puritans sailed across the pond...I was afraid to post this for fear some here might just burst a blood vessel, but in England (where proper English is spoken), they refer to their magistrates (judges) as, "Your worship."
Clearly the reason why the Puritans sailed across the pond...
Correct.
Why would we ask the dead to pray for us? Why not pray the Lord's prayer and ask our Father? Why not trust what God tells us...that the Holy Spirit prays for us?
As for saints, all believers are saints. There is no special thing about one church making a declaration regarding certain people and calling them saints. Indeed, I doubt some of the declared saints are actually in heaven, but that is for God to know and me to not be concerned for those folks are dead.
Perhaps Protestants should stop etching "R.I.P." on their loved ones' tombstones and chisel off those that have it.
"I believe in...the communion of saints..."
It's amazing how many basic tenets of the Christian faith Protestants have abandoned...
Oh no, I think that they believe in the "communion of saints", but probably only in the context of those still on this earth. If we are not all gathered together in heaven in communion, then where do we all go? It would seem to me that common sense tells us that the term "communion of saints" means any individual who believes in Christ - whether here on earth or with him in heaven.
Ditto, sorry if my reaction seemed like an attack. Having been here for years, I have seen thread after thread, on a subject that undercuts our celebration of our Lord's resurrection, for "He is risen, He is risen indeed..."Didn't even cross my mind, I apologize if you feel it was a attack, as I didn't intend it that way. My wife told me we had been invited to Passover at her sisters, and I guess that was on my mind, as it just got cancelled because of the pandemic.
The Church's earliest altars were built over the tombs of her saints. The Church's earliest liturgies invoke the saints to pray for us. The Church's earliest liturgical calendars included commemoration of the saints and martyrs.
Indeed false teaching and oppression by false teachers was too much...Perhaps it was just too much for them...
No new revelation. In fact, less than Rome claims.All that was rejected by people who had a new revelation from God don't you know. The revelations kept right on coming - from Luther to Calvin to Zwingli to Smyth to White to Russell to Smith. Yes sir, they kept right on a coming!
Indeed false teaching and oppression by false teachers was too much...
Nope, I am arguing that the Church at Rome and the Church of England do silly things that are still seen in England. I am arguing that sometimes it is better to just leave.Are you actually arguing the Puritans fled because they thought calling magistrates "my worship" was oppressive and a false teaching?
Can you please substantiate that? I trust you but would just like to see some evidence.
God rejected Rome and it's false representation of His Holiness. He continues to reject Rome until it repents and reforms in conformity with God's declared word in the Bible.
Nope, I am arguing that the Church at Rome and the Church of England do silly things that are still seen in England. I am arguing that sometimes it is better to just leave.
That may be possible, but we would not be alone in our need of help in grasping "rudimentary English"!Jesus prayed in EVERY one of those verses because He was asking something of somebody.
Maybe BOTH of you need to take a course in rudimentary English . . .
No.
I looked half a dozen of those verses up at random and in none of them was Jesus praying (Strong’s G4336: προσεύχομαι proseúchomai) to any person.
Sorry.
That may be possible, but we would not be alone in our need of help in grasping "rudimentary English"!
You claimed that Jesus was praying to people (which is silly given the basic concept of prayer as a supplication to God). In all of the verses I presented, Jesus was praying. In many of the verses I presented, it specifically states that Jesus was alone to pray, so he could not have been praying to a person (telepathy aside). In many other verses that I presented, it explicitly identifies God (the Father) as the one to whom Jesus is praying ... and God the Father is NOT A PERSON, He is GOD. In NONE of the verses where Jesus was praying did Jesus pray TO a person; although Jesus did at times pray FOR a person.
So why don't you go back and reread your comment and my response and see if you can comprehend the English scriptures and stop making foolish claims that just "taint so".
I am speaking from observation. No, it's actually seeing reality and scripture rather than relying on my church to be my mirror.Now YOU are speaking for God? Pray bother, isn't that getting a little bit in front of your skis? I would say that statement is the very definition of the Yiddish word "chutzpah".
I am speaking from observation. No, it's actually seeing reality and scripture rather than relying on my church to be my mirror.