I believe I broke a rule and wasn't very Christlike with this statement. For that, I apologizeI think some are being intentionally/willfully stubborn
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I believe I broke a rule and wasn't very Christlike with this statement. For that, I apologizeI think some are being intentionally/willfully stubborn
No problem brother, we Calvinists expect the 'nons' to act like this so it's normal...lol!!!!!!!!!!! RoflmaoRoflmaoRoflmaoRoflmaoRoflmaoLaughLaughLaughI believe I broke a rule and wasn't very Christlike with this statement. For that, I apologize
"DHK, :Satan is a defeated foe;
When you sin it is from you...not the devil.
What is sin?Yes, Romans 7:18.
What is sin? 1 John 3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. --Every sin is a transgression of the law; God's law. It is not of God, therefore it is of the_______
1 John 3:8
He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. --A plain and straightforward statement, unless you consider your self perfect. In that case you have a problem with 1John 1:8,10
To the Pharisees he said: John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
--Now I know
you have this funny unorthodox idea that when one is saved the old nature, the sin nature is eradicated.
That is not true.
If it were true you would no longer sin. Your lives would be as perfect as Christ's was when he walked this earth, but it isn't. You fail. You sin.
That is even evidenced by some of the posts on this board that contain mocking and name-calling. They too are sinful. Christ would not talk that way.
Sin is of the devil. Sin has not been eradicated. It comes from that old nature, that sin nature which is of the devil.
Let's go to that verse.It is of the lust of the flesh, self. Self is sinful.
Where is the personal assault? Whose name did I mention?I see the personal assault is already on! The accusations. The presuppositions. The arrogance. The 'you don't believe the Bible' accusations. This always comes from you brother. Wonder why? Must be 'the devil', couldn't be from you!
Yes they are. So was Eve, in the garden of Eden, and yet Adam bore the responsibility. Why?Fair enough. Every person is solely responsible for their sin.
It is not an assumption. Or do you deny the depravity of man? Do you have a sin nature or not.No, actually you don't know. That's another false assumption on your part.
Who am I falsely accusing? I am stating my beliefs based on my theology.You're incorrect again and still falsely accusing.
Is it? Then you agree with Icon on this issue, do you? Because that is who it was originally addressed to, though it was you that quoted Romans 7:18.I'm hip! That's what I've been saying!
I have never denied that I sin. Others believe that the sin nature has been eradicated. Ask Icon.Yep. And likewise.
Again, I don't say that I am above everyone else. I freely admit my sin. But others here don't. They believe the sin nature is eradicated and they cannot sin. It is an arrogant position to take.You do the above yourself. Often. Falsely accuse. Misrepresent. Mock. Taunt. All falsely. You've even done it in this thread and in the post I am responding to.
Every day.Ever consider your own sin?
I know. But others don't believe it. Why?Yep. You've proven this to be true.
All sin is "of the devil."
1. When you have no answer for the message you attack the messenger. That is what is done here.Even a common fool can see the dialog above is nothing but deceitful, twisting of statements of others and bearing false witness from dhk, a moderator on this forum.
You show a profound misunderstanding of sin. When a person sins, at least the saved persons I know of, these realize the sin is theirs and don't blame it on 'the devil'. Not only is your honor amiss in that you twist and misrepresent what others have said, so is your theology. But it's OK, it's not your fault, the devil made you do it.
!I see the personal assault is already on! The accusations. The presuppositions. The arrogance. The 'you don't believe the Bible' accusations. This always comes from you brother. Wonder why? Must be 'the devil', couldn't be from you
.You do the above yourself. Often. Falsely accuse. Misrepresent. Mock. Taunt. All falsely. You've even done it in this thread and in the post I am responding to
lets look....since you asked DHK-Who am I falsely accusing?
Where is the personal assault? Whose name did I mention?
It is not an assumption.{ Or do you deny the depravity of man? }
He does not deny mans depravity....he is a Calvinist so he understands it unlike you.
{Do you have a sin nature or not.?}
He never denied any such thing
{Or have you been entirely sanctified? }
Another false obnoxious question
I didn't know you were a Wesleyan that took on Finneyism?
Here you link him to heretics who more closely resemble your views than his
{That is the implication of your answer.}
It is not...it is the accusation of your twisted thoughts which you do all the time...STOP IT...STOP DOING THIS! HE IMPLIED NO SUCH THING.
{He is the one that propagated that one could be sinless.}
That has nothing to do with this, except you seek to diminish INT.T.
He tried to make a community of believers free of sin. {Are you like that?} Or do you sin?
He said nothing about this..it is all your imagination...an evil imagination at that....
What causes you to sin?
. When you have no answer for the message you attack the messenger. That is what is done here.
2. My being a moderator has nothing to do with my right or ability to post. That is just a mark against you as another ad hominem.
we are waiting for you to be truthful....3. My telling the truth is obviously not of the devil.
"DHK,
1
this is what you do...not him.He showed what you did
I don't twist words. I quote them word for word and then give an answer. Your problem is that you don't like the answer I give, and typically, like now, you complain about it.He did not question if you could post...he said stop twisting everyones words.
we are waiting for you to be truthful
Demonstrate where I have not been truthful; where I have been lying before making ugly accusations.....
--And have you given an honest answer to this yet? No.4. Eve, being made perfect, in her innocent state, was deceived by Satan and thus sinned. How do you account for that? All sin is of the devil.
5. 1 John 2:15,16 "sin is not of the Father.. but is of...." What? Obviously the devil.
All sin is of the devil You haven't read all of the first epistle of John yet, Either that or you don't believe it. Which is it?
I didn't say he did. But John certainly does. That is what I said and that is why I said you need to read the First Epistle of John! Have you read it yet? All of it?James does not say..."all sin is of the devil"
Who was Eve enticed by?14 But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.
"DHK,
1
this is what you do...not him.He showed what you did.
He did not question if you could post...he said stop twisting everyones words.
we are waiting for you to be truthful....
4. Eve, being made perfect, in her innocent state, was deceived by Satan and thus sinned. How do you account for that? All sin is of the devil.
5. 1 John 2:15,16 "sin is not of the Father.. but is of...." What? Obviously the devil.
All sin is of the devil You haven't read all of the first epistle of John yet, Either that or you don't believe it. Which is it?
Thanks Iconoclast, it is clearly seen that he lied about my beliefs and casts things against me claiming I believe things I've never addressed or stated.James does not say..."all sin is of the devil"
14 But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.
15 Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.
16 Do not err, my beloved brethren.
--Now I know you have this funny unorthodox idea that when one is saved the old nature, the sin nature is eradicated.
How many times should we have to do this?Do the blind lead the blind?
Go back and read the post. Then go to any page and read the rules of the forum.
One might say that to kick around the name "moderator" as a football, with no respect for the position or the person, but rather just contempt, then it is an attack; it is wrong; it is sin. Who showed who?
I don't twist words. I quote them word for word and then give an answer. Your problem is that you don't like the answer I give, and typically, like now, you complain about it.
Again, when you don't like the message you attack the messenger. This time you are trying to berate me, put me into my position, right?
Demonstrate where I have not been truthful; where I have been lying before making ugly accusations.
--And have you given an honest answer to this yet? No.
I didn't say he did. But John certainly does. That is what I said and that is why I said you need to read the First Epistle of John! Have you read it yet? All of it?
1Jn 3:8 He that committeth sin is of the devil;
--Why does John say that? Why? Because all sin is of the devil.
Who was Eve enticed by?
And yet Icon I can pull passage after passage where you have said that the "old man is dead;" that that old nature (sin nature) has been crucified." To me, in my understanding, that is a denial of the depravity of man. Nowhere does it teach that only the unsaved are depraved or have a depraved nature.How many times should we have to do this?
Cals do not deny depravity of man,
Never said otherwise.Cals do not deny the trinity,
If you deny that the believer has a depraved nature, that the old nature is crucified and dead, you are not far off from Finney and his Oberlin Theology.Cals do not follow Finney,
A denial of the sin nature would automatically lead one to a sinless life. And in this conversation you deny that Satan is the god of this world, and has no influence over the world. You live in the millennial kingdom, as it were. Why shouldn't you be sinless. You should be able to make that claim shouldn't you?Cals do not believe in sinless perfection
I didn't say they did.Cals do not follow jw,
I didn't say they did.Cals do not follow Origen,
I am not the one that needs to learn here. Another poster simply made the observation, posting: "They are dull of hearing." That was in response to what you had posted.So stop trying to insinuate any such garbage....Stop it...STOP NOW, STOP TODAY,
If you cannot refrain yourself from such dishonesty that just disrupts the threads....just observe and learn..
Our old man is dead. That is positional. And yet he is very much alive. That is practical. If he is not alive then you don't have to wait like the rest of us for the redemption of your body. You already have one. That old man, that old nature, that sin nature still abides within you. You struggle with it every day. It will never be eradicated. In Romans 6 it is only a picture, not a reality. It is a picture of our resurrection with Christ as well but we have not yet left this world have we?Here is one example of what is meant by your not being honest....
In any thread where sanctification is being discussed, you mix up the terms and words intentionally.
In Romans 6...Paul says our old MAN is Dead...
You mention the old man, but then mix in the words,
Old nature,sin nature,flesh,old life,body of flesh as if it is all one thing...you tangle the words together when the scripture keeps each in its own place.....
It us then that you mix in your accusations and claim you have "answered"
If so, show where?Thanks Iconoclast, it is clearly seen that he lied about my beliefs and casts things against me claiming I believe things I've never addressed or stated.
First I never made anything up. I responded to a quote. You had quoted me word for word. And in your quotation of me you were the one that was inaccurate. Perhaps you are the one that should apologize.Here is just one of his false accusations:
He just makes things up as he goes, blatantly lies, and he gets by with doing this since he's a moderator. This board has shown its standard by allowing this to go on unchecked.