• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The "Psalm 12:6-7 thingie" used by KJVOs is false.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
Six hour warning
This thread will be closed no sooner that 8:00 am (EDT) / 5 AM PDT
 

Logos1560

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So if an individual only prefers one version, their advocating a false doctrine. Must accept multiple translations to be ok with the preference. Got it.

.

You do not get it or else you misrepresent and distort what it is being said.

It is not being claimed that subjective personal preference for one translation is wrong. KJV-only advocates do not typically admit that their KJV-only view is a mere preference or personal opinion.

What is correctly objected to is making exclusive only claims for one English translation, suggesting that it only is the word of God translated into English or that it only is an every-word perfect English translation. Thus, it is making or believing assertions that are not true that is soundly objected to, and not mere preference.
 

rlvaughn

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I've never flatly stated God created other people, but it can't be completely ruled out.
Yes, we can rule it out. God created only two people, Adam and Eve. Anything else is man-made doctrine denying the historical record of Genesis 1-5, as well as other supporting scriptures in the Bible.
 

robycop3

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You believe the KJB are the words of God too. The gripe are those who don’t accept more translations as you do.
Which isn’t necessarily true either. There are Bibles in other languages from the KJB or have used the same underlying texts.
No, I don't believe the "KJB" is; it's likely a new model car. But I believe the KJV (King James Version) is, along with several other English versions. As for non-English versions, I don't know, as I only use English, but I do know there are plenty of them.

You don’t accept Scriptural support as far as I have seen on those things which you disagree with.
No doctrine of faith/worship not found in or derived from Scripture by clear implication (such as that of the Holy Trinity is) is true. And the KJVO myth is not found in Scripture.

So if an individual only prefers one version, their advocating a false doctrine. Must accept multiple translations to be ok with the preference. Got it.
You twisted my words. I said PREFERENCE is fine; we all have them But insisting one's pet version is the ONLY valid one is wrong.

You obviously agree that the words of God are in the KJB. (Note 1st quote by you.)
No, they're in the KJ"V" among others.

So why get fired up if that’s all that one wants to use?
What a trifle to want to have faith in the KJB if it’s the only one an individual trusts from what you’re saying.
The prob is when one insists the KJV (or any other one version) is the ONLY valid one. That's false.

Since he occasionally used/referenced an alternate translation, again, then there is no longer an issue with those believing in their KJB translation as I’m understanding you.

Anyway, let’s move on.
It's the KJVO MYTH that's the problem, and is a false doctrine. And because the KJVO myth is false, I set forth why it IS false, such as lack of Scriptural support, & that the KJV is far-from-perfect, and the pack of lies within that myth such as the "copyrights" issue, "MVs change Jesus into Satan in Isaiah 14:12", on & on.
 

robycop3

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes, we can rule it out. God created only two people, Adam and Eve. Anything else is man-made doctrine denying the historical record of Genesis 1-5, as well as other supporting scriptures in the Bible.
If you wish to believe God approved incest, then later called it an abomination, feel free to do so.
 

rlvaughn

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
If you wish to believe God approved incest, then later called it an abomination, feel free to do so.
I wish to believe God created who he said he did, no more and no less. If you wish to believe otherwise to soothe your sensibilities, feel free to do so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top