Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So if an individual only prefers one version, their advocating a false doctrine. Must accept multiple translations to be ok with the preference. Got it.
.
Yes, we can rule it out. God created only two people, Adam and Eve. Anything else is man-made doctrine denying the historical record of Genesis 1-5, as well as other supporting scriptures in the Bible.I've never flatly stated God created other people, but it can't be completely ruled out.
No, I don't believe the "KJB" is; it's likely a new model car. But I believe the KJV (King James Version) is, along with several other English versions. As for non-English versions, I don't know, as I only use English, but I do know there are plenty of them.You believe the KJB are the words of God too. The gripe are those who don’t accept more translations as you do.
Which isn’t necessarily true either. There are Bibles in other languages from the KJB or have used the same underlying texts.
No doctrine of faith/worship not found in or derived from Scripture by clear implication (such as that of the Holy Trinity is) is true. And the KJVO myth is not found in Scripture.You don’t accept Scriptural support as far as I have seen on those things which you disagree with.
You twisted my words. I said PREFERENCE is fine; we all have them But insisting one's pet version is the ONLY valid one is wrong.So if an individual only prefers one version, their advocating a false doctrine. Must accept multiple translations to be ok with the preference. Got it.
No, they're in the KJ"V" among others.You obviously agree that the words of God are in the KJB. (Note 1st quote by you.)
The prob is when one insists the KJV (or any other one version) is the ONLY valid one. That's false.So why get fired up if that’s all that one wants to use?
What a trifle to want to have faith in the KJB if it’s the only one an individual trusts from what you’re saying.
It's the KJVO MYTH that's the problem, and is a false doctrine. And because the KJVO myth is false, I set forth why it IS false, such as lack of Scriptural support, & that the KJV is far-from-perfect, and the pack of lies within that myth such as the "copyrights" issue, "MVs change Jesus into Satan in Isaiah 14:12", on & on.Since he occasionally used/referenced an alternate translation, again, then there is no longer an issue with those believing in their KJB translation as I’m understanding you.
Anyway, let’s move on.
If you wish to believe God approved incest, then later called it an abomination, feel free to do so.Yes, we can rule it out. God created only two people, Adam and Eve. Anything else is man-made doctrine denying the historical record of Genesis 1-5, as well as other supporting scriptures in the Bible.
I wish to believe God created who he said he did, no more and no less. If you wish to believe otherwise to soothe your sensibilities, feel free to do so.If you wish to believe God approved incest, then later called it an abomination, feel free to do so.
I agree to disagree about incest.I wish to believe God created who he said he did, no more and no less. If you wish to believe otherwise to soothe your sensibilities, feel free to do so.
Six hour warning
This thread will be closed no sooner that 8:00 am (EDT) / 5 AM PDT
Salty, looks like you may have locked the knob, but left the door open.This thread is closed
Feel free to start a new one