• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Sanctity of Life...Body,Spirit, and Soul

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A soul is one thing. A spirit is another thing. And a body is another thing.
A soul is a person in their existence, and can refer to that person whether they are in the (physical) body or not.


A mans LIVING SOUL, came from God, and goes to hell to wait for judgement.

Actually, when the lost die, they go to Hades to await judgment, then are cast into Hell (at the Great White THrone Judgment.


AFTER judgement ALL life in the mans body AND soul, returns to God, and the BODY AND SOUL are destroyed.

DESTROYED, kaput, nada, exist no more! And are remembered no more.

Again, I ask...exactly what kind of Baptist are you?

I know of no Baptist group that teaches Annihilation.


God bless.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Once an earthly body is living, it is maintained by it's blood. Without blood, the BODY died.

The "cause" of an earthly body to BECOME living, it receives A LIVING SOUL.

The BODY IS SUBJECT TO DEATH ~ BECAUSE IT is appointed ONCE to DIE.

The Living Soul that DOES NOT BECOME Saved, shall be destroyed.

The NEW BIRTH is the BIRTH of a mans NATURAL spirit, (from a mans seed), to a SPIRITUAL spirit, from Gods SEED.

THEN can the Spirit of God Dwell within a man.

God is not BORN AGAIN, the spirit of a man is born again!

The BODY of man dies ~ (spiritually, physically or both)
The SOUL of man is SAVED ~
The SPIRIT OF MAN is BORN AGAIN ~
The Lords Spirit thus dwells within the man BECAUSE the man has been PREPARED to have spiritual fellowship and conversation with thee Spirit God!

Created spirits and spirits born of Gods Seed NEVER DIE.

Holy angel spirits and spirits of men born of God SHALL FOREVER be with the Lord.

Fallen angel spirits SHALL FOREVER be separated FROM the Lord, IN THE PIT OF FIRE, burning eternally, without POWER to escape.


There is simply nothing in this tirade worth dealing with. It is a repeat of the same error already addressed.

Address the Scripture provided you, Happy.


God bless.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Liberal Philosophy ~ LOL ~ What is that Darrell? Don't be shy, I like to know what you are calling me.

It is your philosophy I am addressing, which is both Liberal as well as nauseating.There are many designations for people who promote Abortion, and my suggestion is you choose the one that you feel most comfortable with.

I notice you have nothing to say about the Word of God provided you. Why is that? I have addressed your propositions with Scripture, now it is for you to counter them with Scripture that supports your teaching.

I'll be waiting.

Again, what kind of Baptist are you?


God bless.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You halt on secular understanding.

On the contrary, I address it with Scripture.

Here it is again:


John 6:51-53
King James Version (KJV)

51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

52 The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?

53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.




Duh, I know men receive spirits that endure eternity! It's called being BORN AGAIN.

Men do not "receive spirits" in Regeneration, lol, they are regenerated, and the picture is that of resurrection, not birth.

Every person conceived from Cain to the last babe will endure for eternity.

Annihilation is the doctrine of cults.


Body's are not born AGAIN!

They undergo the same resurrection and change which is like that of Regeneration, one is physical, one is spiritual.


Soul's are not born AGAIN!

They are.

We can be very certain that these "souls..."


Revelation 20:4
King James Version (KJV)

4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.



...are born again believers.


spirit of man IS born AGAIN!

True.


Do you believe BECAUSE MEN SAW JESUS in the LIKENESS as a man, called the Son of God, He had NOT repeatedly BEEN to earth and ministered to men and taught men and given men THE Seed of God?

I believe very much the Son of God had been to the earth and ministered many times...

...but not Jesus Christ.

That would kind of nullify the fact that He was prophesied...to come.

Don't you think?

Jesus Christ has a beginning in the womb of Mary.

The Son of God is the Eternal God, the Creator, and has always existed, and has ministered to man since He created him.


God bless.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Carnally yes. Spiritually no.

If you want to adapt popular pulpiut mythology, and refuse to look at this issue in some detail, okay. Your choice.


Doctor's "save" body's. They are called people. They have an identifying NAME, which is recorded in hospital medical records.

And people lost in shipwrecks are still...called souls. lol

More than 1,500 souls lost at sea

The Titanic was extremely ill-prepared for disaster. There was enough space on the lifeboats for only a third of the passengers and crew, and many of the boats were launched half full or below capacity. Of the crew members, only 23 percent survived. Women and children boarded first as per maritime custom. However, this was still meted out according to class. While 97 percent of first-class women survived, only 31 percent of the children in steerage lived. At the same time, only 13 percent of men in steerage survived.



The term is meant to designate...people.


God "saves" souls. They depart dying body's. They have an identifying NAME, which is recorded in God's book of life.

Yes, God saves people.

And all men are written into the Book of Life at conception.


God bless.
 

Happy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I speak of the carnal - you reply with the spiritual -
I speak of the spiritual - you reply with the carnal -

I am not a Liberal or a heretic or seek mythology - as you have called me when you disagree with what I say and have no basis for your disagreement ~

You can take any statement I have made and seek to see if it is valid according to scripture or carry on in disagreement and post scripture that does not address what I said and continue with your personal jabs as if it makes your disagreement creditable. It doesn't.

Jesus IS the name of the Word of God ~ regardless of what manner (a flesh body) God chose to reveal His Word, it does not change the fact, God named His Word Jesus, and the first man to HEAR Gods Word come forth out from God and Speak, was Adam. <--- That was NOT the beginning of Gods Word <--- That was simply the FIRST time Gods Word was revealed to a created man.

God created dry land and called it earth. And from the dust of the earth God formed something and called it a MAN. God formed the first man, and forms EVERY man and to every seed, God forms that seed it's own form, called a BODY. Pertaining to a HUMAN, it is called a MAN.

Every thing pertaining to "A" single man ~ whether it is from his "natural" birth, or something later given him by his mommy or daddy or BY God; it is connected to that single mans IDENTITY.

God forms mankind ~
God gives mankind life via a living soul ~
God gives mankind His Word "written" ~
God gives mankind His Truth "written" ~
God gives "some" men a living spirit from His Seed ~
God gives "some" men a new heart ~
God gives "some" men His Spirit ~
God gives "some" men His Word ~ within the mans new heart ~
God gives "all" men His Truth when a man has received a new heart ~
God gives "some" men His Wisdom and His Understanding when a man has received a new heart ~

Some things ARE carnal. All carnal things ARE corrupt. Some carnal things follow the way and order to become "holy" . Some carnal things DO NOT.

You attempting to judge me, ACCORDING TO YOU, is a fail. You are not the measure of what my standing is with God.

IF you have a clue what you asked God to forgive you for ~ you would KNOW He forgave you for your NOT BELIEVING in Him.

He forgave your corrupt carnal thoughts and deeds and deception and lies and cheating and for corrupting your living soul....

AND THEN accepted you willfully giving your body to death (crucified with Christ).

Dead bodies do not sin!

God forgave my sin against Him. Gods Power is within me and KEEPS me unto Him.

And NOT ONCE have you ever seen me write or say ANYTHING AGAINST God ~ which would be a sin

So why do you think yourself superior to me in knowledge and understanding according to God, that you feel the need to upchuck your intended derogatory remarks to me?

You have NO CLUE whatsoever my relationship with the Lord or my time spent in fellowship with the Lord or what He teaches me.
 
Last edited:

Happy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
And all men are written into the Book of Life at conception.

God bless.

How did you conclude God is busy writing names in His Book of Life at conception; as if He has to wait and see if a child will be conceived?

Where does His book of life talk about conception?

The Book of Life is the Lamb's book, who is Jesus, who is Christ, who is God.
The Book has all names written of all men born alive, and was written at the time the foundation of the world was being laid, BEFORE mankind was created and occupied the earth.

Rev.13
  1. [8] And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
Rev.17
  1. [8] The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
:)
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Darrell C responding to Happy said:
Adam heard the Word of God. Yes.
Did Adam disobey God? Yes.
Did we learn Adam's sin was covered? Yes.
Did we learn not BELIEVING IN God is Sin against God? Yes
Did we learn Adam and Eve did not believe in God? No.
Were Adam and Eve one flesh? Yes.
Did Eve proclaim they had received a child from the Lord? Yes.
Is it reasonable to believe someone proclaims to receive something they do not believe in? No.
Was a particular stock of men established from which the Lord Jesus would be revealed? Yes.
Does that particular stock of men mention men of that line from which the Lord Jesus was revealed? Yes
Does that particular stock of men mention Adam specifically as a son of God? Yes.
Is an unsaved, un-born again man, a son of God? No.

Relevance to what was posted?

Reason Scripture and points are not addressed?

We both know...


Is ANYTHING about Jesus - His name, His word, His Spirit, the particulars of the human stock line, His works, His body, His soul, the Womb from which He was revealed.....ANYTHING whatsoever....NOT Holy and Pure that pertains to Jesus? No!

Relevance?

To anything I have said?


Luke.3
  1. [38] Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Jesus could NOT be equated with someone who is NOT been restored and accounted as holy.

Jesus cannot be equated to anyone...period.

Are you trying to say that Adam was restored and holy?


Romans 5:17-19
King James Version (KJV)

17 For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)

18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.



There is no-one that was restored and holy...that is why Christ came.


Again ~ IF you are saved and born again ~ you should learn what that means spiritually ~ and put away your philosophical carnal explanations.

It's odd that I have presented Scripture addressing Regeneration, yet you still insist that I need to learn about it..."spiritually".

Okay, another passage for you:


John 1:11-13
King James Version (KJV)

11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.



When did He, Jesus Christ, the Word of God...come to His Own?

It was when He came down from Heaven and inhabited the body created in Mary.

Who rejected Him? His Own. Who were His Own? The Jews.


12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:



When did men begin to believe on Christ? Truly they awaited the Messiah, and had faith that when He came He would set all right, but, the problem is that they were clueless to a spiritual understanding of the Prophecy, and expected that He would cast down Rome and restore Israel to her former temporal and physical glory.

They had no idea of what John will convey next:


13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.



Those who believed...were born of God.

Now John makes it clear that men were born of God...after Christ came. The only one we can say this of prior to this...

  1. [38] Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.


But what happened to Adam, Happy?

He died. That is, He was separated from the union He had with God, and all his children afterwards were conceived in that state.

I have given you numerous Scriptures that show the disciples themselves were not believing in the Resurrection of Christ.

Here is Peter's view of Christ dying prior to Pentecost:


Matthew 16:21-23
King James Version (KJV)

21 From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.

22 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.

23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.

I speak of the carnal - you reply with the spiritual -
I speak of the spiritual - you reply with the carnal -


Nothing spiritual about Liberal philosophies that are contrary to the Word of God, nor presentations so utterly lacking in Scriptural support.

Address the Scripture, Happy.


God bless.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
How did you conclude God is busy writing names in His Book of Life at conception;

It is a logical assumption seeing that in order for man to be in a Book of Life...they must be alive, which begins at conception.


as if He has to wait and see if a child will be conceived?

The Elect are saved in the Eternal Sense in Eternity past due to God's Omniscience, however, they are not saved until they turn to Christ in faith.

The saved are natural until that time, just as men do not live until conceived.


Where does His book of life talk about conception?

It speaks of men in the womb:



Psalm 139:13-16
King James Version (KJV)

13 For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother's womb.

14 I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well.

15 My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth.

16 Thine eyes did see my substance, yet being unperfect; and in thy book all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned, when as yet there was none of them.



While I would agree that God has foreknown the Elect, that does not mean we apply a designation until it is appropriate.

Concerning the Lost...


Psalm 69:25-28
King James Version (KJV)


25 Let their habitation be desolate; and let none dwell in their tents.

26 For they persecute him whom thou hast smitten; and they talk to the grief of those whom thou hast wounded.

27 Add iniquity unto their iniquity: and let them not come into thy righteousness.

28 Let them be blotted out of the book of the living, and not be written with the righteous.



We see those who the Psalmist cries out to God against...are in the Book of the Living.

Secondly, one cannot be blotted from the Book of Life except they first be in there.

And while those unskilled in the Word believe that men can lose their salvation, if they but understood that no man was Eternally redeemed until the Cross they would not make the mistake of making salvation the time one is written in the Book of Life, and the blotting out of such an one indicative of loss of salvation.

Lastly we have to consider the temporal and physical quality of the revelation that was primarily given men in the Old Testament. While David may have sought for their deaths (physical), I think we can see an eternal application to the enemies of Christ.


The Book of Life is the Lamb's book, who is Jesus, who is Christ, who is God.

The distinction of "the Lamb's Book" should be made. I do not view unbelievers, who are written in the Book of Life, to be written in the Lamb's Book of Life.

The Book has all names written of all men born alive,

And, we just saw, those who are not yet born, but are still in the womb.


and was written at the time the foundation of the world was being laid, BEFORE mankind was created and occupied the earth.

You have a serious conflict in trying to propose this, in that the Lost cannot simultaneously be in the Book...and not in the Book.


Rev.13
  1. [8] And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

Again, in view is the Lamb's Book of Life, and we consider the fact that this is a reference to the foreknowledge of God, for, the Lamb was not slain from the foundation of the world (though the necessity was known), but was slain roughly 2,000 years ago, a considerable time after the foundations of the world were laid. We do not simultaneously have the Son of God both creating the world while being slain.


Rev.17
  1. [8] The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.

Again, not literally meaning they were never written in, but speaking of the fact that their perdition was a foregone conclusion from the foundation of the world.

Life begins at conception, and Eternal Life begins at conversion. Both are referenced in a past tense but we do not nullify the actual timing of the events in view.

Antichrist will not go into Hell (he is the first human inhabitant we are told of) after he is born, grows up, and rejects Christ and becomes the minister of Satan. But that does not mean that God either negated a potential for his salvation or Antichrist's responsibility for rejecting Christ. When he is judged, it will be because of his own sin, not God's.

In other words...God does not force Antichrist in the path he will take (or is taking, lol).


God bless.

 

Happy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Nothing spiritual about Liberal philosophies that are contrary to the Word of God, nor presentations so utterly lacking in Scriptural support.

Address the Scripture, Happy.

God bless.

So then stop promoting your Liberal philosophies :)
 

Happy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is a logical assumption seeing that in order for man to be in a Book of Life...they must be alive, which begins at conception.

The Elect are saved in the Eternal Sense in Eternity past due to God's Omniscience, however, they are not saved until they turn to Christ in faith.

The saved are natural until that time, just as men do not live until conceived.


Logic, assuming, in the sense, have nothing to do with Gods understanding and everything to do with man's carnal flesh brain devising explanations.

Conceived is pregnant. Men do not live until they are born, not in the process of the 9 month forming process.

Secondly, one cannot be blotted from the Book of Life except they first be in there.

No kidding. Who said they were not in the book?

The difference between you and me is - you think God waits to see who is in the womb of a pregnant woman, THEN enters their name in the book of Life.

I think God is ALL KNOWING and every man EVER to be born OF the dust of the earth was written in the Lambs Book of Life, BEFORE the beginning of mankind. And that the the information IN that Book IS only privy to Christ WHO blots names OUT, when a man physically dies without being born again. And on judgement day THAT book shall be opened ONLY by Christ Jesus, to reveal the evidence of unsaved, not born again men, whose bodies and souls shall be destroyed.


The distinction of "the Lamb's Book" should be made. I do not view unbelievers, who are written in the Book of Life, to be written in the Lamb's Book of Life.

I believe there is only one book of Life, and it is revealed it is the Lamb's book of life, and ONLY He is worthy to open the book.

And, we just saw, those who are not yet born, but are still in the womb.

You have a serious conflict in trying to propose this, in that the Lost cannot simultaneously be in the Book...and not in the Book.

Good grief - it's not simultaneous. In the book...then blotted out. sheesh!

Again, in view is the Lamb's Book of Life, and we consider the fact that this is a reference to the foreknowledge of God, for, the Lamb was not slain from the foundation of the world (though the necessity was known), but was slain roughly 2,000 years ago, a considerable time after the foundations of the world were laid. We do not simultaneously have the Son of God both creating the world while being slain.

You claim "I" conflict with scripture, which is false.

You conflict with scripture. And you focus on carnal understanding, NOT Gods understanding.

Rev 13
[8] And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.


Again, not literally meaning they were never written in, but speaking of the fact that their perdition was a foregone conclusion from the foundation of the world.

"not literally", "in a sense", "logically", "assumptions" "actual" <---- human psychobabble that has NOTHING to do with Spiritual Understanding according to God.

Life begins at conception, and Eternal Life begins at conversion. Both are referenced in a past tense but we do not nullify the actual timing of the events in view.

Uh huh, we just use our little pea brains and decide what scripture should have said. uh no!

You have stated repeatedly your Liberal view of when you think "life begins".

And Scripture has notified me, only the BORN and BORN-AGAIN, shall forever be with the Lord in His Kingdom.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Darrell C said:
It is a logical assumption seeing that in order for man to be in a Book of Life...they must be alive, which begins at conception.

The Elect are saved in the Eternal Sense in Eternity past due to God's Omniscience, however, they are not saved until they turn to Christ in faith.

The saved are natural until that time, just as men do not live until conceived.


Logic, assuming, in the sense, have nothing to do with Gods understanding and everything to do with man's carnal flesh brain devising explanations.

It is a logical assumption Christ bathed, yet we have no record.

We assume that King David offered up sacrifice (had offered for him, to be precise) up until the day he died, because there was no other option, but we have no record.

We distinguish between the temporal sense (i.e., "My soul will go into the grave sorrowing.") and the eternal sense (I saw souls in Heaven...).

Has nothing to do with carnal reasoning, it has to do with putting the pieces together.


Conceived is pregnant. Men do not live until they are born, not in the process of the 9 month forming process.

And that is Liberal Philosophy.

The babe in the womb is alive. No amount of deflection will change that fact.

Scripture (which you have repeatedly ignored and failed to address) verifies that, and equates the worth of the babe in the womb with the of the offender that causes their death.

Now...what kind of Baptist are you?


God bless.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Secondly, one cannot be blotted from the Book of Life except they first be in there.
No kidding. Who said they were not in the book?

No-one, Happy, the point is that the Lost are in the Book.

The focus is on when they are in the Book.

Your arguing that life does not begin until one is physically born, then...you argue men are in the Book from the foundation of the world.

That is why I went through the trouble to say...

And while those unskilled in the Word believe that men can lose their salvation, if they but understood that no man was Eternally redeemed until the Cross they would not make the mistake of making salvation the time one is written in the Book of Life, and the blotting out of such an one indicative of loss of salvation.

Again, in view is the Lamb's Book of Life, and we consider the fact that this is a reference to the foreknowledge of God, for, the Lamb was not slain from the foundation of the world (though the necessity was known), but was slain roughly 2,000 years ago, a considerable time after the foundations of the world were laid. We do not simultaneously have the Son of God both creating the world while being slain.

The Elect are saved in the Eternal Sense in Eternity past due to God's Omniscience, however, they are not saved until they turn to Christ in faith.

The saved are natural until that time, just as men do not live until conceived.


The difference between you and me is - you think God waits to see who is in the womb of a pregnant woman, THEN enters their name in the book of Life.

It's not a matter of God waiting to see, for He foreknew all men, because He is Omniscient.

The difference we have is that I do not erroneously ascribe fulfillment of something until it actually happens, the focus being when men are considered to be alive. Man does not pre-exist in a spirit state awaiting to be conceived and born, but becomes a living soul at the time of conception. That there is a process of formation does not negate God's view that life begins in the womb.


I think God is ALL KNOWING and every man EVER to be born OF the dust of the earth was written in the Lambs Book of Life, BEFORE the beginning of mankind.

Whereas I view the Lamb's Book of Life to be the finished record of those who are saved.

All men are in the Book of Life, and while we can ascribe Ownership to Christ, it makes little sense to do so.

"The Antichrist is in the Lamb's Book of Life."


You okay with that statement?

And that the the information IN that Book IS only privy to Christ WHO blots names OUT, when a man physically dies without being born again.

I lean heavily towards that but do not think we can be dogmatic as to whether men are blotted out at death or at the Great White Throne. I think there is more evidence for the former.


And on judgement day THAT book shall be opened ONLY by Christ Jesus, to reveal the evidence of unsaved, not born again men, whose bodies and souls shall be destroyed.

At the Great White Throne, the Lost will be judged according to their works, and the suitable punishment, which is not Annihilation, will be given them in their resurrected bodies, which are suitable to the eternity of punishment Christ teaches often.

The "soul" who is judged there, will not have his body or spirit "destroyed," but will go into a state of destruction no different than that which Israel (and the world) was in when Christ came:


Matthew 10:5-6
King James Version (KJV)

5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:

6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.


Matthew 18:11
King James Version (KJV)

11 For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost.



In a state of destruction, which, as I have tried to point out to you from the beginning, has the singular focus on the fact that they are separated from God. That is the state natural man is conceived into, and that is the fate of the Lost on an eternal basis when they stand before God at the Great White Throne.

Now, what kind of Baptist are you, and what group among Baptists teaches Annihilation?


God bless.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The distinction of "the Lamb's Book" should be made. I do not view unbelievers, who are written in the Book of Life, to be written in the Lamb's Book of Life.


I believe there is only one book of Life, and it is revealed it is the Lamb's book of life, and ONLY He is worthy to open the book.

I agree there is only one Book, however, Scripture establishes all men are in it. But, "The Lamb" is specific to salvation, not the general sense of the Book of the Living.

And, we just saw, those who are not yet born, but are still in the womb.

You have a serious conflict in trying to propose this, in that the Lost cannot simultaneously be in the Book...and not in the Book.

Good grief - it's not simultaneous. In the book...then blotted out. sheesh!

That is what you are arguing, lol.

Consider:


Revelation 17:8
King James Version (KJV)

8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.



Does it not say their names were not written in the Book from the foundation of the world?

Yet we know they are, because, as I told you, they have to be in there in order to be blotted out.

It is a statement encompassing the reality that is known only in the eternal sense, meaning, there was never any chance they would somehow divert from what was known to God about them from the foundation of the world.


Again, in view is the Lamb's Book of Life, and we consider the fact that this is a reference to the foreknowledge of God, for, the Lamb was not slain from the foundation of the world (though the necessity was known), but was slain roughly 2,000 years ago, a considerable time after the foundations of the world were laid. We do not simultaneously have the Son of God both creating the world while being slain.

You claim "I" conflict with scripture, which is false.

You do. You teach men are not alive until physically born, a Liberal and false doctrine refuted numerous times already in this Thread.

You teach Annihilation, which directly contradicts the teachings of Christ and the Apostles, as well as Prophets.

And you do not even address what I have said here, which forces a repeat of what has already been said. A good point is made above, Happy, actually try to consider it.


You conflict with scripture.

Feel free to show me where and how. I wish you would, because you have generally ignored the Scripture given you to support the points I have been making.


And you focus on carnal understanding, NOT Gods understanding.

God views life to begin in the womb, not after men are physically born, an error held by Jews who have not received the revelation of the New Testament, and have never understood the Old Testament above the understanding of natural men.


Rev 13
[8] And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

In view is the point that the Lamb was slain from the foundation of the world, and you can review Revelation 17:8 above to see where the use of this type of statement is used to also present the concept of ""It is a done deal from eternity past."

Now...what type of Baptist are you? Your Doctrine is not Baptist on these issues, so I would like to know if there is a new type of Baptist that teaches this heresy.


God bless.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Again, not literally meaning they were never written in, but speaking of the fact that their perdition was a foregone conclusion from the foundation of the world.

"not literally", "in a sense", "logically", "assumptions" "actual" <---- human psychobabble that has NOTHING to do with Spiritual Understanding according to God.

So you are going to stand on the conflicting position that men are not written in the Book from the foundation of the world, and...that they are?

Think about it, you will see that I am correct on this.

Just say "men were literally not written into the Book of Life from the foundation of the world."

Then explain how they can be blotted out if that is the literal meaning here.


Life begins at conception, and Eternal Life begins at conversion. Both are referenced in a past tense but we do not nullify the actual timing of the events in view.

Uh huh, we just use our little pea brains and decide what scripture should have said. uh no!

Well, obviously some of us take that approach...

;)


You have stated repeatedly your Liberal view of when you think "life begins".

It's not my view, it is the view of God, Who gave us the Word of God, which makes it abundantly clear that life begins in the womb.


And Scripture has notified me, only the BORN and BORN-AGAIN, shall forever be with the Lord in His Kingdom.

Which is a faulty understanding of what it means to be "born of water and Spirit."

God does not cleanse men through physical birth, but by the Word of God:


Ezekiel 36:25
King James Version (KJV)

25 Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you.


Ephesians 5:25-26
King James Version (KJV)

25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;

26 That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,


1 Peter 1:22-23
King James Version (KJV)

22 Seeing ye have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit unto unfeigned love of the brethren, see that ye love one another with a pure heart fervently:

23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.



Men are cleansed by the Gospel of Jesus Christ, that is the water which God promised in regards to men being born of God, which, again, began at Pentecost, not during the Ages of physical provision.

No man had received the Spirit of God in the Eternal sense until then:


John 7:38-39
King James Version (KJV)

38 He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.

39 (But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive: for the Holy Ghost was not yet given; because that Jesus was not yet glorified.)



Life begins at conception, and it is Liberal Philosophy (as it does not warrant a title of Theology) that teaches otherwise. And it is the doctrine of demons that teaches Annihilation, which is contrary to the teachings of Christ.

Now, what kind of Baptist are you?


God bless.
 

Happy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So you are going to stand on the conflicting position that men are not written in the Book from the foundation of the world, and...that they are?

Think about it, you will see that I am correct on this.[ /QUOTE]

Just say "men were literally not written into the Book of Life from the foundation of the world."

Then explain how they can be blotted out if that is the literal meaning here.

Good grief, you want me to SPEAK YOUR words, and then explain them? LOL


It's not my view, it is the view of God, Who gave us the Word of God, which makes it abundantly clear that life begins in the womb.

Abundantly clear eh? Then you should have no problem giving abundant scriptures that say "life begins in the womb".

Which is a faulty understanding of what it means to be "born of water and Spirit."

There are two thoughts on that topic. I choose the one I believe and you do the same. In that we do not agree does not automatically make my understanding faulty.

God does not cleanse men through physical birth, but by the Word of God:

I never said that.

Ezekiel 36:25
King James Version (KJV)
25 Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you.

And where is it announced that is your FIRST birth?


Life begins at conception, and it is Liberal Philosophy (as it does not warrant a title of Theology) that teaches otherwise. And it is the doctrine of demons that teaches Annihilation, which is contrary to the teachings of Christ.

Well... it seems you are well acquainted and an authority of liberal philosophy. Rah for you!

The fetus is part of the mother's body until the fetus is formED and DELIVERED and SEVERED from the mother.

The very scriptures in Exodus, teaches you IF a pregnant woman is harmed, the instigator is punished for harming the woman. (NOT the fetus). After the fetus is BORN and Then dies, it is life of the instigator FOR THE LIFE of the BORN baby.

You want to believe a fetus in the PROCESS of being formed is existing independently as an individual, so what? It isn't.
It is the mother (according to the law of nature), that provides all the fetus' needs, while God is FORMING the body that WILL be born and be an individual human being.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Darrell C said:
So you are going to stand on the conflicting position that men are not written in the Book from the foundation of the world, and...that they are?

Think about it, you will see that I am correct on this.

Just say "men were literally not written into the Book of Life from the foundation of the world."

Then explain how they can be blotted out if that is the literal meaning here.


Good grief, you want me to SPEAK YOUR words, and then explain them? LOL

They are your words...if you try to maintain that men are written in the Book of Life before the foundation of the world.

Because that is said, but, so is...


https://www.baptistboard.com/bible/revelation/17:8/
Revelation 17:8
King James Version (KJV)

8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is
.

Both cannot be true.

So the reason why you are asked...

Just say "men were literally not written into the Book of Life from the foundation of the world."


...is because...you cannot say that.

And you are letting your emotion defeat you, that you not recognize some simple truth that negates your doctrine. You need to think about that.


It's not my view, it is the view of God, Who gave us the Word of God, which makes it abundantly clear that life begins in the womb.

Abundantly clear eh?

Yes, and you know that.

That is why you do not address the Scripture provided you.


Then you should have no problem giving abundant scriptures that say "life begins in the womb".

I have given you numerous Scriptures. Why would I give more until you address them, particularly when we both know you won't, and you would not address further Scripture.

Here is another one...


Hosea 12:2-4
King James Version (KJV)

2 The Lord hath also a controversy with Judah, and will punish Jacob according to his ways; according to his doings will he recompense him.

3 He took his brother by the heel in the womb, and by his strength he had power with God:

4 Yea, he had power over the angel, and prevailed: he wept, and made supplication unto him: he found him in Bethel, and there he spake with us;



...for you to ignore.



Which is a faulty understanding of what it means to be "born of water and Spirit."


There are two thoughts on that topic. I choose the one I believe and you do the same.

There is only one correct "thought," Happy, Scripture and it's truth is not something we decide it to be.



In that we do not agree does not automatically make my understanding faulty.

I agree.

It is Scripture that shows your understanding faulty.


God does not cleanse men through physical birth, but by the Word of God:

I never said that.

Okay, I will explain:


And Scripture has notified me, only the BORN and BORN-AGAIN, shall forever be with the Lord in His Kingdom.

Which is a faulty understanding of what it means to be "born of water and Spirit."

God does not cleanse men through physical birth, but by the Word of God:


There is nothing in Scripture that ties physical birth to Regeneration. Being born of "water and Spirit" is speaking of the same things Scripture always teaches in regards to Regeneration: the "water" speaks of cleansing, and the "Spirit" speaks of God's promise and work in the process. Both of which are descriptive of the singular event of being "born of God."

Here are the posted Scriptures meant to generate interest on your behalf, or at least a point to begin refuting my view:

Ezekiel 36:25
King James Version (KJV)

25 Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you.


Ephesians 5:25-26
King James Version (KJV)

25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;

26 That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,


1 Peter 1:22-23
King James Version (KJV)

22 Seeing ye have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit unto unfeigned love of the brethren, see that ye love one another with a pure heart fervently:

23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.


We also see the cleansing aspect of Regeneration here:


Titus 3:4-5
King James Version (KJV)

4 But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared,

5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;



James also speaks of being born of God and the aspect of the Word of God:


James 1:18
King James Version (KJV)

18 Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.



And if you think about it, it makes no sense whatsoever for Christ to be made to say "Except a man be physically born and born of the Spirit he cannot enter the Kingdom of God."

Regeneration has no application to people who are not physically born, just as it had no relevance to the Old Testament Saint, because all Old Testament Saints died without being born again, and still in need of Eternal Redemption, which Scripture has also been provided to you, and equally ignored.

Now, what kind of Baptist are you?


Continued...
 
Top