• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Sharp Divide: How to deal with it

Status
Not open for further replies.

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Thanks for the clarification. So would it be fair to say that Herald is not a calvinist, but is calvinistic in soteriology? And that you, and many other baptists are not Arminians, but are believe as Arminians do in the area of soteriology?

Let's just avoid the comparison all together. That is what is fair.
 

12strings

Active Member
So what I think I'm getting is this...It is better (less confusing, less volatile, less chance for unfair associations) all around for everyone if we use terms to describe ourselves and others that are NOT tied to a person's name, but since it is helpful to use descriptive terms to refer to a set of beliefs and/or practices, we should simply use different words...for example:

-reformed is better than calvinist
-free-will is better than arminian
-presbyterian is a better name than lutheran
-methodist is a better name than wesleyan
-Baptist is a better name than mennonite
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Keep in mind this cuts both ways. You may have a church that holds to the FW position with members who hold to the DoG. Since they are in the minority they may not feel comfortable making their disagreement known. The same for the FW members in a DoG church. I wouldn't say these people are necessarily hiding. They're exercising discretion. That's one of the reasons I started this thread. For conscience sake it may be better if they leave for a church that is like-minded with their convictions.

I'm struggling with this right now. I had to litterly pull out of a pastor that he is diirecting the church he pastors in, in the direction of New Covenant theology (which he is serious about). When I confronted him with it as a sticking point, he shoved it off as something that I would have to just get over. I beg to differ...this a NCT thing will influence his entire teaching process ...and I would want to avoid that least it starts to impact my thinking process adversely. Subsequently I don't even trust or like the guy now...frankly view him as dishonest.
 

Herald

New Member
I'm struggling with this right now. I had to litterly pull out of a pastor that he is diirecting the church he pastors in, in the direction of New Covenant theology (which he is serious about). When I confronted him with it as a sticking point, he shoved it off as something that I would have to just get over. I beg to differ...this a NCT thing will influence his entire teaching process ...and I would want to avoid that least it starts to impact my thinking process adversely. Subsequently I don't even trust or like the guy now...frankly view him as dishonest.

There is a difference between individuals who hold to a contrary position and decide not to leave a church and someone who knows exactly what they are doing and trying to pull a power play (overtly or covertly). I know people who cannot leave the church they are in because of their spouse or children. It is those people I am writing about; the people with honorable intentions.
 

Herald

New Member
So what I think I'm getting is this...It is better (less confusing, less volatile, less chance for unfair associations) all around for everyone if we use terms to describe ourselves and others that are NOT tied to a person's name, but since it is helpful to use descriptive terms to refer to a set of beliefs and/or practices, we should simply use different words...for example:

-reformed is better than calvinist
-free-will is better than arminian
-presbyterian is a better name than lutheran
-methodist is a better name than wesleyan
-Baptist is a better name than mennonite

Well, if we are in a position of church leadership our belief system should not be a mystery. If you move into a new town and are looking for a new church, should that church's belief system be difficult to ascertain? I have visited some church websites that purposely do not state what they believe. I know one pastor who told me, "We follow the Bible. That's what we believe." That had to be one of the most evasive answers I was ever given. Of course all Christian churches will claim to follow the Bible, but does that mean each church believes the same thing about the Bible? If so, then why do some churches teach the FW position and others the DoG? Why are some churches cessationist and other churches are are not? Finally, why are some churches so sensitive about coming clean on what they believe? Is it some sort of state secret?
 

12strings

Active Member
Well, if we are in a position of church leadership our belief system should not be a mystery. If you move into a new town and are looking for a new church, should that church's belief system be difficult to ascertain? I have visited some church websites that purposely do not state what they believe. I know one pastor who told me, "We follow the Bible. That's what we believe." That had to be one of the most evasive answers I was ever given. Of course all Christian churches will claim to follow the Bible, but does that mean each church believes the same thing about the Bible? If so, then why do some churches teach the FW position and others the DoG? Why are some churches cessationist and other churches are are not? Finally, why are some churches so sensitive about coming clean on what they believe? Is it some sort of state secret?

I agree with this, I was simply pointing out that both you and rev seem to not want to use labels that come from a human leader, but rather simply describe what you believe...which make sense.
 

12strings

Active Member
Let's just avoid the comparison all together. That is what is fair.

Are you saying it is UNFAIR to look at one group of people's beliefs on a certain issue, and then look at a two well-known historical figures, and then say that on this particular issue, group "A" seems to agree with person "X", and group "B" seems to agree with person "Z"?

I agree with justification by faith...That doesn't make me a baby-baptizing Lutheran, but it does mean that on the issue of justification, I am more Lutheran than Roman Catholic. And I don't have a problem with someone saying that about me.
 

Herald

New Member
I agree with this, I was simply pointing out that both you and rev seem to not want to use labels that come from a human leader, but rather simply describe what you believe...which make sense.

I will concede this much; if I'm asked whether I'm a Calvinist, I'll answer that I agree with Calvin on some things but disagree with him on others. If I am labeled a Calvinist because of my belief on election and predestination, I can accept that. I just do not define myself by that term.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Well, if we are in a position of church leadership our belief system should not be a mystery. If you move into a new town and are looking for a new church, should that church's belief system be difficult to ascertain? I have visited some church websites that purposely do not state what they believe. I know one pastor who told me, "We follow the Bible. That's what we believe." That had to be one of the most evasive answers I was ever given. Of course all Christian churches will claim to follow the Bible, but does that mean each church believes the same thing about the Bible? If so, then why do some churches teach the FW position and others the DoG? Why are some churches cessationist and other churches are are not? Finally, why are some churches so sensitive about coming clean on what they believe? Is it some sort of state secret?

Its a state secret if they are attempting to manipulate and sell a theology through sneaking it in...I remember one pastor just state that he was slowly educating the flock to a point they would accept Calvinism without any pushback. It is done all the time. This pastor stealthfully introducing NCT is one example. This guy would never pubically admit to it unless caught in the act. Ive seen another pastor flood his website with salvation testimomies but without siting substantives as to the grace that got them saved in the first place. These are all very deceptive tactics ...not operating above board.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Are you saying it is UNFAIR to look at one group of people's beliefs on a certain issue, and then look at a two well-known historical figures, and then say that on this particular issue, group "A" seems to agree with person "X", and group "B" seems to agree with person "Z"?

I agree with justification by faith...That doesn't make me a baby-baptizing Lutheran, but it does mean that on the issue of justification, I am more Lutheran than Roman Catholic. And I don't have a problem with someone saying that about me.

Agreeing with Lutherans does not make on "more Lutheran". It just means that you agree with them.
 

Herald

New Member
Its a state secret if they are attempting to manipulate and sell a theology through sneaking it in...I remember one pastor just state that he was slowly educating the flock to a point they would accept Calvinism without any pushback. It is done all the time. This pastor stealthfully introducing NCT is one example. This guy would never pubically admit to it unless caught in the act. Ive seen another pastor flood his website with salvation testimomies but without siting substantives as to the grace that got them saved in the first place. These are all very deceptive tactics ...not operating above board.

This example, on face value, seems to be disingenuous (not on your part, but the pastor's part).
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Benjamin

Are you once again questioning others salvation by making your stereotypical little suggestions geared to insinuate such by using your “sly” tactics to say that only “unbelievers” would, even if rhetorically, think of such a thing?

You would like to twist my words to say so. It frustrates you evidently.
Are you saying that someone who hates his brother demonstrates the marks of a christian?


Show some guts, man up, have some integrity for change and give it to me straight, Icon, I can take it.


What does this mean? It does not put any money in my pocket to destroy you, to speak evil of you. I would rather speak and discuss things that edify. Your dislike of what I hold as truth prevents this from happening.

You sound like an intelligent person just misguided and off track from what I can see. Your constant attacks against the biblical position force the responses to go in a certain direction. You come across as an enemy.


Then take your reasoning and also apply it literally to Calvin for his actual deeds.
Calvin has lived and died and will face God as his Lord and Saviour, or as judge. The teaching does not depend on his view of theocracy at Geneva.Some attack him, some defend him. God has already dealt with him.....Do not let that issue detract from the scripture. He was only one man,


Weeeellll, now, isn't that special! Quoted scriptures, eh?
You attack herald saying he was insensitve, or revmitchel, with Hos comments...and now make fun or make light of the Scottish Covenanters

I doubt you would have to use your words"guts enough" to "man up' and quote scripture as your flesh was melting in the flame. Your comment is more insensitive than any here. Can you try and conduct yourself in a different way...you are sounding bitter:love2:


I hope God had pre-selected them for that election and they weren't just blowing smoke with that demonstation.

I would be more confident of them and their scriptural testimony than your snide comments.....the book is Fair Sunshine....read it and tell me if you want to recant of your poor statements.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I was rhetorically making fun of "your" reasoning and debate tactics...get a clue!

:thumbs:

Making fun of me or my abilities is one thing.....if you read the book ,you would not include them in it

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/663517.Fair_Sunshine

http://www.wicketgate.co.uk/issue50/e50_5.html

Snippets from the Covenanters
From the book "Fair Sunshine" by Jock Purves



A COVENANTER'S ORDINATION.

"After Brown, and Koelman, a Dutch minister, had lifted their hands, the great MacWard kept his upon Richard Cameron's light brown locks, saying 'here is the head of a faithful minister and servant of Jesus Christ who shall lose the same for his Master's interest, and it shall be set up before sun and moon in the public view of the world'"
A COVENANTER'S REUNION.

"Before the hangman set head and hands on the blood-stained Netherbow Port… a hero saint lying in prison was shown them. He was Alan Cameron, Covenanter. The cruel question was asked him 'Do you know them?' … He kissed them, saying 'I know them. I know them. They are my son's, my own dear son's. It is the Lord. Good is the will of the Lord, who cannot wrong me nor mine, but has made goodness and mercy to follow us all our days'".
A COVENANTER'S WEDDING.

"John Brown was the very close friend of both Richard Cameron, the Lion of the Covenant, and of Alexander Peden, the Prophet of the Covenant. Peden had married Brown to Isabel Weir in 1682, and after this simple Puritan ceremony had said to Isabel: 'Ye have a good man to be your husband, but ye will not enjoy him long; prize his company and keep linen by you to be his winding sheet, for ye will need it when ye are not looking for it, and it will be a bloody one.'"
A COVENANTER'S LEGACY.

"But the killer of many (Claverhouse) unbelted his pistol, and hastily walking up to John Brown, placed it to his head, and blew his brains out, scattering them over the ground. Looking at his ghastly work with a sardonic smile, he turned to Isabel saying: 'What do you think of your fine husband now?' And through her sad tears she bravely answered: 'I ever thought much good of him, and more than ever now…' Isabel Brown set her child upon the ground, gathered up her husband's brains, tied up his head, straightened his body, and, covering it with a plaid, sat down and wept."

"She bound the corpse's shattered head,
And shrouded the martyr in his plaid;
And where the dead and living slept,
Sat in the wilderness and wept".





back to Edition 50 Index to top of page to next article

This Page Title – Snippets on the Covenanters
The Wicket Gate Magazine "A Continuing Witness".
Internet Edition number 50 – placed on line September 2004
Wicket Gate contact address – Mr Cliff Westcombe cw@wicketgate.co.uk
If you wish to be notified when each new edition goes on line please send an e-mail to the above address
Magazine web address – www.wicketgate.co.uk
 

saturneptune

New Member
Making fun of me or my abilities is one thing.....if you read the book ,you would not include them in it.
While we disagree on some points of Scripture, one thing I could never do is make fun of your abilities. To me, there is nothing more admirable than learning the depth of knowledge, including the languages, that you have by self reading. Whether I agree with the posts or not, they come across as well or better than many who have spent more time in seminary than they did K-12. That is the only way I have ever learned, but not in the depths you post, especially on DoGs, end times, and covenant vs dispy theology.

Snippets from the Covenanters
From the book "Fair Sunshine" by Jock Purves

A COVENANTER'S ORDINATION.

"After Brown, and Koelman, a Dutch minister, had lifted their hands, the great MacWard kept his upon Richard Cameron's light brown locks, saying 'here is the head of a faithful minister and servant of Jesus Christ who shall lose the same for his Master's interest, and it shall be set up before sun and moon in the public view of the world'"
A COVENANTER'S REUNION.

"Before the hangman set head and hands on the blood-stained Netherbow Port… a hero saint lying in prison was shown them. He was Alan Cameron, Covenanter. The cruel question was asked him 'Do you know them?' … He kissed them, saying 'I know them. I know them. They are my son's, my own dear son's. It is the Lord. Good is the will of the Lord, who cannot wrong me nor mine, but has made goodness and mercy to follow us all our days'".
A COVENANTER'S WEDDING.

"John Brown was the very close friend of both Richard Cameron, the Lion of the Covenant, and of Alexander Peden, the Prophet of the Covenant. Peden had married Brown to Isabel Weir in 1682, and after this simple Puritan ceremony had said to Isabel: 'Ye have a good man to be your husband, but ye will not enjoy him long; prize his company and keep linen by you to be his winding sheet, for ye will need it when ye are not looking for it, and it will be a bloody one.'"
A COVENANTER'S LEGACY.

"But the killer of many (Claverhouse) unbelted his pistol, and hastily walking up to John Brown, placed it to his head, and blew his brains out, scattering them over the ground. Looking at his ghastly work with a sardonic smile, he turned to Isabel saying: 'What do you think of your fine husband now?' And through her sad tears she bravely answered: 'I ever thought much good of him, and more than ever now…' Isabel Brown set her child upon the ground, gathered up her husband's brains, tied up his head, straightened his body, and, covering it with a plaid, sat down and wept."

"She bound the corpse's shattered head,
And shrouded the martyr in his plaid;
And where the dead and living slept,
Sat in the wilderness and wept".

back to Edition 50 Index to top of page to next article

This Page Title – Snippets on the Covenanters
The Wicket Gate Magazine "A Continuing Witness".
Internet Edition number 50 – placed on line September 2004
Wicket Gate contact address – Mr Cliff Westcombe cw@wicketgate.co.uk
If you wish to be notified when each new edition goes on line please send an e-mail to the above address
Magazine web address – www.wicketgate.co.uk
Thank you for posting those lines. They were very moving, even though I am not quite sure how they relate to the thread.
 

saturneptune

New Member
You would like to twist my words to say so. It frustrates you evidently.
Are you saying that someone who hates his brother demonstrates the marks of a christian?
No, hating ones brother does not set a good example as a Christian. That is the second great commandment. In fact, I do not think we should hate anyone, believer or unbeliever. Hate is a word that is tossed around lightly. It is like the difference between joy and happy. Joy is a fruit of the Spirit that abides in ones soul if saved, and is there always for the Christian. Happy is a surface feeling that comes and goes. Hate is one of those down deep characteristics that is always present. It is not the mark of a Christian. Angry or mad comes and goes on the surface like happy. Of course, when we observe someone angry at someone else, we really do not know if it is genuine hate or not. If it is true abiding hate, especially for a fellow brother or sister in Christ, I do not see how they could be a believer.


What does this mean? It does not put any money in my pocket to destroy you, to speak evil of you. I would rather speak and discuss things that edify. Your dislike of what I hold as truth prevents this from happening.
Personally I think it is rare for there to be a true hatred of one member to another on this board. I do think we all get frustrated with each other for several reasons. One is not communicating well in this medium. It could also be from a significant difference in the depth of understanding the issue between the two parties. Also, there are some issues that anger a certain person. The differences between Doctrines of Grace and free will seems to pull everyone's chain to one degree or another. I believe most personal attacks are out of frurstration, not genuine hate. We cannot see each other face to face. Sometimes a persons wording or manner of expressing themselves seems rude to another when in fact it is not.

You sound like an intelligent person just misguided and off track from what I can see. Your constant attacks against the biblical position force the responses to go in a certain direction. You come across as an enemy.
Maybe it is more of a frustrated person than an enemy.

Calvin has lived and died and will face God as his Lord and Saviour, or as judge. The teaching does not depend on his view of theocracy at Geneva.Some attack him, some defend him. God has already dealt with him.....Do not let that issue detract from the scripture. He was only one man,
This is one point you are totally correct about. This is one person from the past I have a real problem with, especially having an entire major Biblical doctrine named after. I do not know if it was that Mr. Calvin was constantly talked about in church growing up, (I grew up in a PCA church). This has been talked about over and over. This is one of those things I need to let go. God as already dealt with it as you said. Things like this can eat a person up.
 

Herald

New Member
There are some participants on this board that display a lack of Christian charity in many of their posts. I have had to repent of my responding in kind to some of their posts. Insulting others is not the mark of a believer. Doing it repeatedly is the mark of someone who is unregenerate. I had to block those posters. Perhaps it is best for them too. If my theological positions bother them so much they are best served by avoiding them.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
saturneptune

While we disagree on some points of Scripture, one thing I could never do is make fun of your abilities. To me, there is nothing more admirable than learning the depth of knowledge, including the languages, that you have by self reading.

We are to be stewards of whatever we have from God..Jesus said we are to love God and love our neighbor which is expressed in the 10 commandments in our heart.

10 As every man hath received the gift, even so minister the same one to another, as good stewards of the manifold grace of God.

11 If any man speak, let him speak as the oracles of God; if any man minister, let him do it as of the ability which God giveth: that God in all things may be glorified through Jesus Christ, to whom be praise and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.



Paul repeats this in romans 13:8-10
8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.

9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.





4 Let a man so account of us, as of the ministers of Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of God.

2 Moreover it is required in stewards, that a man be found faithful.


3 But with me it is a very small thing that I should be judged of you, or of man's judgment: yea, I judge not mine own self.

4 For I know nothing by myself; yet am I not hereby justified: but he that judgeth me is the Lord.

5 Therefore judge nothing before the time, until the Lord come, who both will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts: and then shall every man have praise of God.

6 And these things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself and to Apollos for your sakes; that ye might learn in us not to think of men above that which is written, that no one of you be puffed up for one against another.

7 For who maketh thee to differ from another? and what hast thou that thou didst not receive? now if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory, as if thou hadst not received it?

8 Now ye are full, now ye are rich, ye have reigned as kings without us: and I would to God ye did reign, that we also might reign with you.[/QUOTE]
So....it is not optional but rather if we are doers of the word we must labour with all our strength to do this-


Whether I agree with the posts or not, they come across as well or better than many who have spent more time in seminary than they did K-12. That is the only way I have ever learned, but not in the depths you post, especially on DoGs, end times, and covenant vs dispy theology.

When a pastor goes to seminary they are under pressure to acquire theology and be concerned to pass classes to some extent.They do not have as much time to meditate on what they are learning as they will have afterwards.
What happens next is, they begin in a church and find out that the demands of ministry and dealing with "troubled" or needy saints occupy their time and use them up. if they are not seriously disciplined in their private devotional life and maintain a solid discipline of reading and study, they are in danger of burnout.
Early on God providentially placed me in the path of several very substantial ministries where the pastors did not slack -off so to speak, but were pedal to the metal kind of teachers.
Being pointed to some of the more solid teachers helps,big time in that you do not have to re-invent the wheel.Everything builds and grows as it should.


Thank you for posting those lines. They were very moving, even though I am not quite sure how they relate to the thread.
The book Fair Sunshine is like Foxes book of martyrs. It is a short paperback but as sad as it is in that it is accounts of believers being put to death by religious persons....one thing comes across.God had them in His hand. I do not like to read too many accounts like that one , but it stays with you when you read it.


That is the only way I have ever learned, but not in the depths you post, especially on DoGs, end times, and covenant vs dispy theology.

I was taught several of the wrong positions first...but I was told they were true. In trying to defend them, i really tried to learn them throughly.
When i studied through Hebrews for a few years ...it changed my theological world.
Interesting thing about learning more....you learn how much you did not know before, and how much more you still do not know.:thumbs:
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
There are some participants on this board that display a lack of Christian charity in many of their posts. I have had to repent of my responding in kind to some of their posts. Insulting others is not the mark of a believer. Doing it repeatedly is the mark of someone who is unregenerate. I had to block those posters. Perhaps it is best for them too. If my theological positions bother them so much they are best served by avoiding them.

This is so true.Sometimes in the heat of the discussion we can get pulled in...so to speak , but emotions, or responding to lying, or twisting of words.
I deal with a rough crowd so to speak as i travel about,and sometimes i forget to mentally shift gears so to speak and keep a biblical priority to things.
This struggle to mortify pride is a work in progress. The failures are for all to see:thumbs: When we remember it is God's church and His people we get back on track:wavey:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top