• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The sinners prayer

Status
Not open for further replies.

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
You are a determinist.

You don't admit it to yourself or others perhaps, but you are a determinist by any objective standard and consulting any normally agreed upon definition.

Actually after looking up the definition I must concede that you may be correct.

de·ter·min·ism [dih-tur-muh-niz-uhm]
noun

1. the doctrine that all facts and events exemplify natural laws.

2. the doctrine that all events, including human choices and decisions, have sufficient causes.


http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/determinist

I must take exception to #1 above. Normally all facts and events follow natural law. However, on occasion God may set aside natural law and perform a miracle contrary to natural law! You do believe in miracles do you not?

However, when it comes to salvation, God chose certain to Salvation from the foundation of the world and will bring those "elect" to Salvation in Jesus Christ. I believe God's election and Sovereign Grace are sufficient causes.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
It's a perfectly reasonable term, and quite accurate.

It cannot be resisted, therefore it is, by definition....."irresistible".

Whether that is because God has so providentially determined or ordered things such that no person to whom he chose to extend that grace has the will to "resist" or can possibly desire to resist or by some other means......it is the case that there is no set of circumstances wherein the object of God's grace, can possibly either resist it or choose to resist it.......
So.....it's "irresistible".

I can conquer a people by drugging them sufficiently such that they have no will......nay, even a desire to "resist", and therefore rendering my will "irresistible".

"overpowering" would be, perhaps...
or maybe "conquering"...
but not "irresistible".

Calvinists just hate words which accurately describe their beliefs
such as "determined" or "limited" atonement etc...

Soon we'll get the "Particular Atonement" speech I imagine as well. :rolleyes:

You are entitled to your opinion even when it is nonsense!
 

Inspector Javert

Active Member
You are entitled to your opinion even when it is nonsense!

If it is "nonsense" to claim that the term "irresistible grace" is accurate and useful, then it is was similarly "foolish" for those proponents of YOUR THEOLOGY who coined the term to have done so.

I am merely saying that when they coined the term...
It was accurate and meaningful and remains useful.

My "opinion" (when it comes to those particular terms) is that the Calvinists who created them knew what they meant when they created those terms to describe their own view.

Your attempt at calling my opinion "foolish" is not particularly helpful to your cause inasmuch as you are calling your fellow Theological allies "fools" for coining the phrase to begin with. :thumbsup:
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
If it is "nonsense" to claim that the term "irresistible grace" is accurate and useful, then it is was similarly "foolish" for those proponents of YOUR THEOLOGY who coined the term to have done so.

I am merely saying that when they coined the term...
It was accurate and meaningful and remains useful.

My "opinion" (when it comes to those particular terms) is that the Calvinists who created them knew what they meant when they created those terms to describe their own view.

Your attempt at calling my opinion "foolish" is not particularly helpful to your cause inasmuch as you are calling your fellow Theological allies "fools" for coining the phrase to begin with. :thumbsup:

You make unsubstantiated statements about my belief system. I have invited you on another thread to define what constitutes that belief system. You are invited to do the same on this thread if it is convenient for you to do so. As I said earlier I am patient.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Just ordered my easter gospel tracts and unfortunately WOTM & Tract Planet have none (as of this writing) so I ordered some from CBD. One by John Piper on 10 Reasons Jesus Came to Die I noticed uses the sinners prayer at the end of it. However the tract hits hard on sin, God's wrath, judgment, and God's Holiness so its a recommended tract, unlike most of the other easter ones. Someone told me once that Reformed before the 20th century used the sinners prayer, is this true? I can understand the use of the sinners prayer, however I do not think people whom think they are saved just for saying a prayer and then living like Satan after it. Plenty of false converts whom are currently into New Age, and Wicca also said the prayer at one time. Dozens of these examples fill the WOTM book I am reading as the author has a zealous passion against the prayer. So what say you? Did Reformed at one time use the prayer? Personally the prayer can be a good starting point as long as people understand that it does not save anyone, it just communicates turning from Sin to God.


There is no method of evangelism that can assure no false converts. Jesus doesn't even address methods of evangelism causing false converts. They will be around regardless of the sinners prayer or not.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
There is no method of evangelism that can assure no false converts. Jesus doesn't even address methods of evangelism causing false converts. They will be around regardless of the sinners prayer or not.

You have said it well! And no system of theology is going to assure no false converts either!
 

Tom Butler

New Member
I don't know any Calvinist who believes that God saves people against their wills.

Old Regular said in his post that God makes them willing. How does He do that?

Ezekiel 36:26 gives us a clue:
A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh.

In other words, God changes our "want-to."

How does He do that? I dunno. But it is obvious that it is an act of God Himself.

Here's Jeremiah 24:7
I will give them a heart to know me, that I am the LORD. They will be my people, and I will be their God, for they will return to me with all their heart.

There are no conditions here. This is a unilateral act of God

And Jesus Himself told Nicodemus in John 3 that nobody can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again. We call it being regenerated.

Regeneration, then, is a sovereign act of God. Thus, salvation follows regeneration.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Elect from eternity past is determinism.

thiose who view election as based upon our free will, as God forknowledge of us deciding to accept jesus meant that God elected from eternity, as he already knew that would happen!

Either way, its still election from etrnity past, just questionif the basis for it was will of god or will of man!
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I don't know any Calvinist who believes that God saves people against their wills.

Old Regular said in his post that God makes them willing. How does He do that?

Ezekiel 36:26 gives us a clue:


In other words, God changes our "want-to."

How does He do that? I dunno. But it is obvious that it is an act of God Himself.

Here's Jeremiah 24:7


There are no conditions here. This is a unilateral act of God

And Jesus Himself told Nicodemus in John 3 that nobody can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again. We call it being regenerated.

Regeneration, then, is a sovereign act of God. Thus, salvation follows regeneration.

usually, many who refuse the traditional calvinistic view of salvation also have faulty views regarding the fall also!
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
I don't know any Calvinist who believes that God saves people against their wills.

Old Regular said in his post that God makes them willing. How does He do that?

Ezekiel 36:26 gives us a clue:


In other words, God changes our "want-to."

How does He do that? I dunno. But it is obvious that it is an act of God Himself.

Here's Jeremiah 24:7


There are no conditions here. This is a unilateral act of God

And Jesus Himself told Nicodemus in John 3 that nobody can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again. We call it being regenerated.

Regeneration, then, is a sovereign act of God. Thus, salvation follows regeneration.

Thank's Tom! Well said and just as I believe the Bible teaches!
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
thiose who view election as based upon our free will, as God forknowledge of us deciding to accept jesus meant that God elected from eternity, as he already knew that would happen!

Either way, its still election from etrnity past, just questionif the basis for it was will of god or will of man!
You keep bringing up this foreseen faith view but I don't know anyone that adheres to that.
 

JamesL

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I don't know any Calvinist who believes that God saves people against their wills.

Old Regular said in his post that God makes them willing. How does He do that?

Ezekiel 36:26 gives us a clue:


In other words, God changes our "want-to."

How does He do that? I dunno. But it is obvious that it is an act of God Himself.

Here's Jeremiah 24:7


There are no conditions here. This is a unilateral act of God

And Jesus Himself told Nicodemus in John 3 that nobody can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again. We call it being regenerated.

Regeneration, then, is a sovereign act of God. Thus, salvation follows regeneration.


That's one of the biggest failings of Calvinism. It reduces the new covenant rebirth/regeneration to a mere, subjective change on disposition. BUT, if you read Hebrews 9-10, the New Covenant promises to PERFECT us, to REMOVE sins.

Calvinism portrays the scenario as God washing us, but we're still dirty. New heart, but still the same old guy

Horrible
 

Benjamin

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I know of absolutely no non-Calvinist (at least recently on this board) who thinks or claims that Calvinists believe that God saves people against their wills.

Well, I had to think twice about why you'd say that with all the hyper-determinist on this board that deny any human volition exists whatsoever, but then I remembered that Calvinist believe that God gives them a new will first so I guess I get it.

Yeah that's right, God recreates the will when He's ready for His influences to actually be effectual so no real choice then it logically follows no saving them against their will. :tonofbricks: How could have missed those little details! :eek:
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
....In other words, God changes our "want-to."....

I like that. :)

And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up; that whosoever believeth may in him have eternal life. Jn 3:14,15

And Jehovah said unto Moses, Make thee a fiery serpent, and set it upon a standard: and it shall come to pass, that every one that is bitten, when he seeth it, shall live. Nu 21:8

The brazen serpent was lifted up for those that were bitten. It is the Spirit working within His children that causes them to feel their need for Him.

...They that are whole have no need of a physician, but they that are sick: I came not to call the righteous, but sinners. Mk 2:17

Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled. Mt 5:6

But he that doeth the truth cometh to the light, that his works may be made manifest, that they have been wrought in God. Jn 3:21

God has already wrought within those that come to Christ, He's given them the "want-to", whether it's manifested as fear of retribution, or a desire to live, or an inexplicable attraction to Him, it doesn't matter, the Spirit works in many ways within His children. It's AFTER they get to Christ is when they learn the truth about things.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top