Not being a determinist I would not know! But I do believe Scripture teaches that the Saints, the "true believers", should obey God.
Elect from eternity past is determinism.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Not being a determinist I would not know! But I do believe Scripture teaches that the Saints, the "true believers", should obey God.
You are a determinist.
You don't admit it to yourself or others perhaps, but you are a determinist by any objective standard and consulting any normally agreed upon definition.
de·ter·min·ism [dih-tur-muh-niz-uhm]
noun
1. the doctrine that all facts and events exemplify natural laws.
2. the doctrine that all events, including human choices and decisions, have sufficient causes.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/determinist
It's a perfectly reasonable term, and quite accurate.
It cannot be resisted, therefore it is, by definition....."irresistible".
Whether that is because God has so providentially determined or ordered things such that no person to whom he chose to extend that grace has the will to "resist" or can possibly desire to resist or by some other means......it is the case that there is no set of circumstances wherein the object of God's grace, can possibly either resist it or choose to resist it.......
So.....it's "irresistible".
I can conquer a people by drugging them sufficiently such that they have no will......nay, even a desire to "resist", and therefore rendering my will "irresistible".
"overpowering" would be, perhaps...
or maybe "conquering"...
but not "irresistible".
Calvinists just hate words which accurately describe their beliefs
such as "determined" or "limited" atonement etc...
Soon we'll get the "Particular Atonement" speech I imagine as well.
You are entitled to your opinion even when it is nonsense!
If it is "nonsense" to claim that the term "irresistible grace" is accurate and useful, then it is was similarly "foolish" for those proponents of YOUR THEOLOGY who coined the term to have done so.
I am merely saying that when they coined the term...
It was accurate and meaningful and remains useful.
My "opinion" (when it comes to those particular terms) is that the Calvinists who created them knew what they meant when they created those terms to describe their own view.
Your attempt at calling my opinion "foolish" is not particularly helpful to your cause inasmuch as you are calling your fellow Theological allies "fools" for coining the phrase to begin with. :thumbsup:
Just ordered my easter gospel tracts and unfortunately WOTM & Tract Planet have none (as of this writing) so I ordered some from CBD. One by John Piper on 10 Reasons Jesus Came to Die I noticed uses the sinners prayer at the end of it. However the tract hits hard on sin, God's wrath, judgment, and God's Holiness so its a recommended tract, unlike most of the other easter ones. Someone told me once that Reformed before the 20th century used the sinners prayer, is this true? I can understand the use of the sinners prayer, however I do not think people whom think they are saved just for saying a prayer and then living like Satan after it. Plenty of false converts whom are currently into New Age, and Wicca also said the prayer at one time. Dozens of these examples fill the WOTM book I am reading as the author has a zealous passion against the prayer. So what say you? Did Reformed at one time use the prayer? Personally the prayer can be a good starting point as long as people understand that it does not save anyone, it just communicates turning from Sin to God.
There is no method of evangelism that can assure no false converts. Jesus doesn't even address methods of evangelism causing false converts. They will be around regardless of the sinners prayer or not.
A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh.
I will give them a heart to know me, that I am the LORD. They will be my people, and I will be their God, for they will return to me with all their heart.
Elect from eternity past is determinism.
I don't know any Calvinist who believes that God saves people against their wills.
Old Regular said in his post that God makes them willing. How does He do that?
Ezekiel 36:26 gives us a clue:
In other words, God changes our "want-to."
How does He do that? I dunno. But it is obvious that it is an act of God Himself.
Here's Jeremiah 24:7
There are no conditions here. This is a unilateral act of God
And Jesus Himself told Nicodemus in John 3 that nobody can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again. We call it being regenerated.
Regeneration, then, is a sovereign act of God. Thus, salvation follows regeneration.
I don't know any Calvinist who believes that God saves people against their wills.
Old Regular said in his post that God makes them willing. How does He do that?
Ezekiel 36:26 gives us a clue:
In other words, God changes our "want-to."
How does He do that? I dunno. But it is obvious that it is an act of God Himself.
Here's Jeremiah 24:7
There are no conditions here. This is a unilateral act of God
And Jesus Himself told Nicodemus in John 3 that nobody can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again. We call it being regenerated.
Regeneration, then, is a sovereign act of God. Thus, salvation follows regeneration.
You keep bringing up this foreseen faith view but I don't know anyone that adheres to that.thiose who view election as based upon our free will, as God forknowledge of us deciding to accept jesus meant that God elected from eternity, as he already knew that would happen!
Either way, its still election from etrnity past, just questionif the basis for it was will of god or will of man!
Elect from eternity past is determinism.
Yeah, all those Calvinists can't be wrong can they?
no TK..they are not wrong as you are a prime example..wrong view of the fall ,all other doctrines are off.:wavey::wavey:
You keep bringing up this foreseen faith view but I don't know anyone that adheres to that.
I don't know any Calvinist who believes that God saves people against their wills.
Old Regular said in his post that God makes them willing. How does He do that?
Ezekiel 36:26 gives us a clue:
In other words, God changes our "want-to."
How does He do that? I dunno. But it is obvious that it is an act of God Himself.
Here's Jeremiah 24:7
There are no conditions here. This is a unilateral act of God
And Jesus Himself told Nicodemus in John 3 that nobody can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again. We call it being regenerated.
Regeneration, then, is a sovereign act of God. Thus, salvation follows regeneration.
I don't know any Calvinist who believes that God saves people against their wills.
I know of absolutely no non-Calvinist (at least recently on this board) who thinks or claims that Calvinists believe that God saves people against their wills.
....In other words, God changes our "want-to."....