The Unique distinctive of this board - Christian Evolutionism debates

Not really. You made a broad statement and applied it to a broad group. If someone thinks that Genesis is literal, then science does disprove it.

Strawman...knocked down...

 

Uh-huh..

Keep shaking your fist and pretending that what you say is true...

 

There is nothing fallacious anywhere in the logic. It is ironclad. There are only two points of possible contention, and those are the assumptions on which the argument is based. Given those assumptions, the logic is impeccable.

That's how all proof works, you know. Assumptions are granted, consequences worked out. No other way of doing proof exists.

You will never see any "proof" anywhere without assumptions. That's the way proof works. This is only an observation, not a valid criticism.

Perhaps you would like to assert the assumption is false. Well, you can then point out where science has been done incorrectly, as many have attempted to do without success on this board. The science behind evolution is solid.

I deny that there is any circular reasoning anywhere in this syllogism.

Nobody I ever heard of proposed that scenario. A straw man fallacy.

I'm very sorry you don't like the fact the Tyronosaurus Rex killed and ate and died long before man came along on the scene. But I didn't invent that idea. That's what happened.

OK BobRyan, you've been shown to have no concept of what proof really means, you've been shown to use straw men for arguments, you've been shown to have no concept of what a circular argument is, and you've certainly been shown to refuse to accept the findings of science.

This is not really a particular failing of your own. It is typical of the mind set of the creationist crowd in general. You are only following your crowd. Posting by reflex starts to look kind of silly after a while. Be more rigorous in your logic!