Originally posted by BobRyan:
Classic fallacies of logic presented by the mythologies of evolutionism.
There is nothing fallacious anywhere in the logic. It is ironclad. There are only two points of possible contention, and those are the assumptions on which the argument is based. Given those assumptions, the logic is impeccable.
That's how all proof works, you know. Assumptions are granted, consequences worked out. No other way of doing proof exists.
#1. Notice that in point a - the salient point is "assumed" not "proven".
You will never see any "proof" anywhere without assumptions. That's the way proof works. This is only an observation, not a valid criticism.
Perhaps you would like to assert the assumption is false. Well, you can then point out where science has been done incorrectly, as many have attempted to do without success on this board. The science behind evolution is solid.
#2. Notice that circular reasoning is then applied to get evolutionism to "fit".
I deny that there is any circular reasoning anywhere in this syllogism.
#3. Notice that NO rational is given for HOW the Gospel could POSSIBLY be true - GIVEN that mankind DID NOT fall into sin from some perfect sinless state BUT INSTEAD -
"As little Adam sat on his cave floor bashing in his ration of monkey brains. Mommy hominid watched - looking on in approval. When SUDDENLY Adam had -A Bad Thought - and then God the Son would have to die for his sins or else burn him in hell fire".
Nobody I ever heard of proposed that scenario. A straw man fallacy.
Clearly - evolutionism makes a mockery of the Gospel BECAUSE it's "creator" is "Death, Starvation, Extermination, Carnage, blood-baths".
Such "a paradise" is the "essence" of Evolutionism's "process of creation".
I'm very sorry you don't like the fact the Tyronosaurus Rex killed and ate and died long before man came along on the scene. But I didn't invent that idea. That's what happened.
But "of course" this is just another debunking of the myths of evolutionism that many evolutionists don't want to see "discussed".
And that is rather sad.
OK BobRyan, you've been shown to have no concept of what proof really means, you've been shown to use straw men for arguments, you've been shown to have no concept of what a circular argument is, and you've certainly been shown to refuse to accept the findings of science.
This is not really a particular failing of your own. It is typical of the mind set of the creationist crowd in general. You are only following your crowd. Posting by reflex starts to look kind of silly after a while. Be more rigorous in your logic!