George Antonios
Well-Known Member
For the umptieth time, give a verse to prove your humanistic, naturalistic claim, or drop the unbiblical mantra.
Just repeating it a thousand times doesn't make it Biblical.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
This is Must Reading On the KJVO Position!
- Thread starter Yeshua1
- Start date
- Status
Just repeating it a thousand times doesn't make it Biblical.
George Antonios
Well-Known Member
George Antonios
Well-Known Member
Way to go ignoring the scriptures (post #65) by repeating a humanistic, naturalistic mantra.
Apostles alone had inspiration to their books, correct?
IF the Kjv 1611 was a perfect work, why where there thousands of corrections and fixes made to it afterwards?
George Antonios
Well-Known Member
Ok, evidently, like @Logos1560, you are not reading my words when you answer.
Did you not read when I said:
"The following verses say nothing about the KJB, but they teach that a copy, and sometimes a translated copy, can be given by inspiration of God: Luke 4:21, John 5:39, Acts 8:32, Acts 8:35, Acts 17:2, Acts 17:11, Acts 18:24, Acts 18:28, Romans 15:4, Romans 16:26, 2Timothy 3:15, 1Peter 2:6, 2Peter 1:20." ?!
George Antonios
Well-Known Member
Hey brother, I tire of asking you for a verse.
37818
Well-Known Member
There is a spectrum of KJVOism. The problem begins with modernism. The CT translations are a problem. RSV, ASV, NASB, NIV. The NKJV shares in the problem.
I was using the NKJV for awhile. The more I used it, the more I disliked it. The KJV is currently the better choice.
It is a text by text issue. Even the KJV. The KJV textual issues are fewer than the modern translations in the NT. The NKJV has the same as the KJV plus new ones.
George Antonios
Well-Known Member
You see the problem with such an approach is that there are more opinions than opiniators on this topic.
Somewhere along the line (around the 1880s to be precise) Christians gave up on faith and the supernatural nature of the words of God in preservation and translation and transmission. Christianity, at least Western Christianity, has today adopted a naturalistic view of preservation. And that's the problem.
Inspiration only applies to the Apostles themselves!
John 16:13
You should really read that book linked earlier about KJVO sect by Dr Price!
Since when?... You need to think again!... Brother Glen
2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
Actually, Eramus and others like Luther were textual critics, so those who are using textual criticisms are not denying God or are atheists, as those on the Esv, Nas, Niv translation teams were just as saved as those on 1611 team!
Inspiration is to who else thenSince when?... You need to think again!... Brother Glen
2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
I know of no Christian doctrines affected by Nas.Esv.Nkjv do you?
The Originals by their hands were only inspired ones!Since when?... You need to think again!... Brother Glen
2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
3:17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
Your bogus, man-centered allegations are false.
My correct statements properly asserted God's supernatural work concerning the giving of the Scriptures to the prophets and apostles. Thus, it is a complete falsehood do claim that there is no place for God's supernatural work in my scripturally-based observations.
God did preserve His words to us in the Greek/Hebrew texts, but did not inspire translation teams!
George Antonios
Well-Known Member
Mark and Luke weren't there when Christ said that and they weren't apostles, so the words of Mark and Luke were not given by inspiration?
- Status