Not laws. Edicts. I don't think you can show me any properly passed laws about masks, except laws prohibiting adults from wearing masks.Laws deal with wearing masks.
I thought that was the point of this discussion: Is it right for them to do so?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Not laws. Edicts. I don't think you can show me any properly passed laws about masks, except laws prohibiting adults from wearing masks.Laws deal with wearing masks.
I thought that was the point of this discussion: Is it right for them to do so?
Cleveland Clinic Statement on Previous COVID-19 Infection ResearchBoth statements are from the Cleveland clinic, which is my point.
The one statement from the CC, states those who have had the virus get no additional benefit from taking the vaccine.
The next statement says, go ahead and take the vaccine anyway.
It makes no sense, scientifically or medically, to take a vaccine that doesn’t benefit you at all, but exposes you to a small risk of complications.
The only reason to say, “go ahead and take the vaccine anyway”, is because of politics, not science.
peace to you
I don't think Federal Govt should decide my health care. Pro choice. Keep your laws off my body. All that crap that supposedly protects abortion, should protect me from vaccines and masks. My body. My choice.The federal government should decide for federal buildings, the state government for state buildings, and business owners for their place of business.
International travel (perhaps airlines in general) should follow federal guidelines.
You left out the sentence that stated zero, that is correct, zero (that means not even one) re-infection for those who were unvaccinated but had been infected with the virus and recovered.Cleveland Clinic Statement on Previous COVID-19 Infection Research
Cleveland Clinic Statement on Previous COVID-19 Infection Research – Cleveland Clinic Newsroom
This is still a new virus, and more research is needed. It is important to keep in mind that this study was conducted in a population that was younger and healthier than the general population. In addition, we do not know how long the immune system will protect itself against re-infection after COVID-19. It is safe to receive the COVID-19 vaccine even if you have previously tested positive, and we recommend all those who are eligible receive it.”
FYIBut now there is a lot of confusion because the CDC says it's a novel virus, but the NIH says it's the H1N1. Sorry, can't have both. It's one or the other.
I agree. We should make our own decisions.I don't think Federal Govt should decide my health care. Pro choice. Keep your laws off my body. All that crap that supposedly protects abortion, should protect me from vaccines and masks. My body. My choice.
I don't think Federal Govt should decide my health care. Pro choice. Keep your laws off my body. All that crap that supposedly protects abortion, should protect me from vaccines and masks. My body. My choice.
Yep.Does that go for seat belts and helmets ?
Yep.
Agreed, but they can go way too far in the area of "protecting us from others."My basic beleif is that govts job is to protect us from others - not from ourselves.
If the govt really wants to protect us - they would make booze and cancer stick illegal.
Disagree - "can go too far"Agreed, but they can go way too far in the area of "protecting us from others."
What I posted was the bottom-line recommendation of the Cleveland Clinic. You seem to think you can i9nterpret the results of that in-house study better than they can. I'll go with the Cleveland Clinic's conclusion not yours.You left out the sentence that stated zero, that is correct, zero (that means not even one) re-infection for those who were unvaccinated but had been infected with the virus and recovered.
That is 100% immunity, which is better than the 95% immunity given by the vaccine and no additional risks of complications no matter how small.
Let’s hope those numbers hold up over time.
peace to you
That’s fine. No problem.What I posted was the bottom-line recommendation of the Cleveland Clinic. You seem to think you can i9nterpret the results of that in-house study better than they can. I'll go with the Cleveland Clinic's conclusion not yours.
A lot of deaths we're caused by Trump's bungling our response to the challenge. There's a good reason why we've had the most deaths of any country. That reason was completely ineffective "leadership" by the previous administration.That’s fine. No problem.
However, I can think for myself and I can see clearly when the “bottom line” is contradictory and based on politics, not science.
Will the Cleveland Clinic be held accountable for the unnecessary complications people endure, including our children? Will anyone in the government be held accountable for their decisions during this pandemic?
How many deaths attributed to Governor's policies that resulted in deaths? How many deaths caused by Fauci first saying “don’t wear a mask”, then saying “do wear a mask”, then admitting he lied about wearing masks so there would be plenty of masks for first responders and then changing his story again saying he changed his mind on masks based on the science.
peace to you
A lot of deaths we're caused by Trump's bungling our response to the challenge. There's a good reason why we've had the most deaths of any country. That reason was completely ineffective "leadership" by the previous administration.
Yet then they tell you the opposite.Report: Vaccinated Are Nearly 6 Times More Likely to Die From COVID Variant
Yet they tell you the opposite. What is the truth? And don’t you think you’re entitled to it?
Trump response:A lot of deaths we're caused by Trump's bungling our response to the challenge. There's a good reason why we've had the most deaths of any country. That reason was completely ineffective "leadership" by the previous administration.