Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Only if you don't understand what "irresistable grace" means.Originally posted by gb93433:
If one believes in irresistable grace then Jesus was not God because Judas rebelled.
My guess is that you can't read the above. You don't konw Greek, as I recall. And the English "were having been" is a perfect tense, meaning that the "disposition" (an unfortunate translation) happened before the believing.Originally posted by ILUVLIGHT:
Hi Larry;
Greek Interlinear
Act 13:48
akouonta de ta eqnh ecairon kai edoxazon
And hearing the nations rejoiced and gloriifed
ton logon tou kuriou, kai episteusan
the word of the Lord, and believed
osoi hsan tetagmenoi eiV zwhn aiwnion:
as many as were having been disposed to life eternal.
As I read this above it would seem to me that your interpretation of the Greek is lacking.
It very clearly states we are disposed to eternal life after we believe
The chornology has nothing to do with it and I walked right through Act 13:48.Larry's response;
But that's not what the verse says. It says that those who "were ordained ... believed." The ordaining to eternal life preceded the belief in the verse.
Yes I did.You did not read my post.
That wasn't the issue.In your world I did not believe before the foundation of the world...but your world is not Gods'.
Yes, and you believed in time after the foundation of the world, and God chose you before the foundation of the world. This is a matter fo the text of Scripture, what it says. I don't understand why you are not letting the text say what it says.He exists on a different plane. GOD IS THERE and was there where I believed.
That is totally irrelevant to this discussion however. We all agree on that.Please continue to read now, this is the crux of the matter: GOD IS EQUALLY PRESENT EVERYWHERE AT ALL TIMES ACROSS THE ENTIRE TIME SPACE CONTINUIM!
I have not problem being illogical in favor of Scripture. It shows that we are not the system driven by logic; you are.This is profound yet simple, and also makes Calvinism illogical.
Both assertions are correct: It all came from God and must be interpreted by itself. But only one comes from 2 Peter. The second does not.Wrong about II Peter as well. Scripture is of no private interpretation because it all came from God, through holy men of old, therefore it is in concert and must be interpreted by itself. This is an accepted and well founded law of herm.
You are correct on this. And this is precisely why we must reject your position. It does not take into account all of Scripture in its context.ALLOW GOD TO INTERPRET GOD, for man cannot, and if he is allowed to grab and jerk VERSES one at a time out of context (i.e. Eph 1:4 and Acts 13:48) then heresy will result...and it has.
No, it does say that ordained came first. Read teh verse, study the tenses, and it becomes very clear.As far as support for being Ordained first it doesn't say if they were or not That's just your input.
Page 1,11th post down. Which was your original claim. Do you deny that now.Where did I claim anything about word order?
In The Light Of Christ;But that's not what the verse says. It says that those who "were ordained ... believed." The ordaining to eternal life preceded the belief in the verse.
Only because he is wrong.Come on guys you are fishing for reasons to prove LArry wrong,
Page 1,11th post down. Which was your original claim. Do you deny that now.Originally posted by ILUVLIGHT:
Larry;
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> Where did I claim anything about word order?
In The Light Of Christ;But that's not what the verse says. It says that those who "were ordained ... believed." The ordaining to eternal life preceded the belief in the verse.
First we weren't talking about Act 13:38 but 13:48. And the verse doesn't say what you and Cassidy says it does at all. It says they believed and as many that did were ordained to eternal life.My only point, Mike, was to point out that Acts 13:38 says one thing, and you say another. You can say it is only one verse, and that is fine. But it is still one verse with the words that God inspired. If God had wanted to say what you said, he certainly could have. He decided not to.
That is exactly what we are saying. The anti-calvinists are saying it should read "those who believe were appointed." We believe it should read "those who were appointed, believed."Originally posted by Ray Berrian:
Dr. A.T. Robertson, a Baptist Greek scholar, says in his Word Study in Acts Volume III p. 200,
"The subject of this verb is the relative clause. By no manner of legerdemain can it be made to mean "those who believe were appointed."
Exactly! Alford agrees with us that it should read "as many as were disposed to eternal life, believed" instead of "those who believed were disposed to eternal life." Once again you have shown that the best Greek scholars agree with the Calvinists here and disagree with the anti-calvinists.Another Greek scholar was Dean Alford who agrees with Robertson--also says, the Greek rendering is 'as many as were disposed to eternal life, believed.'
Sorry, but you have completely misunderstood and misrepresented both Robertson and Alford. Read again what they say. They say that first they were ordained, they they believed.Originally posted by Ray Berrian:
Your presupposition leads you to believe that the words, 'as many as were disposed to eternal life, believed,' suggesting that they only believed in Jesus because He ordained them for this lot in life.
No, what the scholars mean is that the Holy Spirit disposed people to either reject or to received Christ.
Exactly! All of those that were disposed to eternal life believed.Another Greek scholar was Dean Alford who agrees with Robertson--also says, the Greek rendering is 'as many as were disposed to eternal life, believed.'
I do not agree at all with your theory.Without the use of human volition no sinner can receive Jesus as Savior. He knocks at the door rather than knocking down the heart's door. The persuasive ministry of the Holy Spirit leads people to see their need of Jesus Christ. The Bible does not speak of any 'absolutum decretum.'
God saved King David's illegitimate baby.
Scripture says, 'He cannot come to me, but I will go to be with him,' with reference to his baby. Yes, God saves minors in cases like this.[End Quote].