Top 10 Global Warming Myths

[Gold Dragon]

Have you seen Google timelapse? 40 years of satellite photos of the entire globe at almost every scale you can get on google earth. I know they have powerful computers at google but what is the advantage of using all that power to doctor photos for some leftist conspiracy?

 

[carpro]

Have you seen Google timelapse? 40 years of satellite photos of the entire globe at almost every scale you can get on google earth. I know they have powerful computers at google but what is the advantage of using all that power to doctor photos for some leftist conspiracy?

 

[carpro]

The Undeniable “Consensus” is That There is an Overwhelming Liberal Media Bias | Climate Change Dispatch


For all their talk about “inclusion,” “equality,” “fairness,” “diversity,” and “equal opportunity,” the liberals may talk the talk, but they certainly don’t walk the walk. This kind of extreme bias is also seen regarding the staffing of our colleges and universities. While the “consensus” regarding climate change is debatable, the bias of the press is undeniable.

Simply put, the extreme bias of our media, educational complex, NGOs and sympathetic politicians and government agencies undermine the public from ever getting an honest representation of the reality of climate change. Fortunately, even with such extreme biases in some of our most important institutions, the general public has the common sense to see right through the lies.

 

[Gold Dragon]

The Undeniable “Consensus” is That There is an Overwhelming Liberal Media Bias | Climate Change Dispatch


For all their talk about “inclusion,” “equality,” “fairness,” “diversity,” and “equal opportunity,” the liberals may talk the talk, but they certainly don’t walk the walk. This kind of extreme bias is also seen regarding the staffing of our colleges and universities. While the “consensus” regarding climate change is debatable, the bias of the press is undeniable.

Simply put, the extreme bias of our media, educational complex, NGOs and sympathetic politicians and government agencies undermine the public from ever getting an honest representation of the reality of climate change. Fortunately, even with such extreme biases in some of our most important institutions, the general public has the common sense to see right through the lies.

I'm so thankful that you posted this post from a website with the very balanced and reputable lead article title of "Slam-tastic! Tucker Carlson TORCHES lib eco-hypocrites in 90 seconds [video]" to show me the unbiased truth. I now see the light. I can't believe I trusted all those liars before. Please show me more of this gold mine of reputable quality information I've been missing all my life.

 

[carpro]

A few decades ago the media and many in the scientific community were in hysterics over global cooling. Newsbusters has a roundup of the various news outlets that promoted the global cooling hysterics from 1970:

"Scientists See Ice Age in the Future," Washington Post, January 11

"Is Mankind Manufacturing a New Ice Age for Itself?", Los Angeles Times, January 15

"Pollution Could Cause Ice Age, Agency Reports," St. Petersburg Times, March 4

"Scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century," Boston Globe, April 16

"Pollution called Ice Age Threat," St. Petersburg Times, June 26

"U.S. and Soviet Press Studies of a Colder Arctic," New York Times, July 18

"Dirt Will Bring New Ice Age," Sydney Morning Herald, October 19

An article from Newsweek in 1975 cited the "almost unanimous" consensus among meteorologists that global cooling "will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century." The article even cites a report from the National Academy of Sciences at the time warning: "A major climatic change would force economic and social adjustments on a worldwide scale."


What happened?

No money in "global cooling".

But a vast potential for global redistribution of wealth seen in "global warming".



"Money from the federal government and leftist organizations fuel a lot of misinformation from man-made global warming alarmists. Climate change alarmism is an extremely lucrative industry. All in all, there have been over $32.5 billion of federal government grants that have funded climate change research from 1989-2009, far more than any research funded by the oil industry. National Review reports:

Last summer, a minority staff report from the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works gave details on a “Billionaire’s Club” — a shadowy network of charitable foundations that distribute billions to advance climate alarmism. Shadowy nonprofits such as the Energy Foundation and Tides Foundation distributed billions to far-left green groups such as the Natural Resources Defense Council, which in turn send staff to the EPA who then direct federal grants back to the same green groups. It is incestuous. It is opaque. Major media ignored the report."

 

[carpro]

I'm so thankful that you posted this post from a website with the very balanced and reputable lead article title of "Slam-tastic!

It's at least as credible as the ones you quoted.


The left likes to claim that 97 percent of scientists support the concept of man-made climate change. It's likely closer to 43 percent. The 97 percent myth stems from a variety of flawed studies, as the Daily Wire explained here. On the other hand, the PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency conducted a survey in 2015 that found that only 43 percent of scientists believe in man-made climate change, which is far from a consensus.


http://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/fil...ence-survey-questions-and-responses_01731.pdf


CLIMATE SCIENCE SURVEY
Questions and Responses
Bart Strengers, Bart Verheggen

___________________________________________________________

Blogger John Cook determined in 2013 that 97 percent of "abstracts of peer-reviewed papers" believed that "human activity is responsible for some warming," but a more exhaustive study of Cook's work determined that only 0.3 percent of the 11,944 papers reviewed by Cook concluded that "human activity is causing most of the current warming."


.03% That's some consensus.

 

[carpro]

Even the UN, the head perpetrator of the climate change scam recognizes the "alarmist" campaign isn't working. They see trillions of american dollars fluttering away because of it and are really concerned.

Alarmism Not Working: World Citizens Rank Climate Change Dead Last As Concern
By Kenneth Richard on 15. September 2016
un-world-unconcerned-about-agw

Over the last few years, the United Nations has been conducting an online poll, asking the world’s citizens —well, those fortunate enough to have access to electrical power, a computer, and the internet — what is most important to them, what concerns them most, or what issue they view as the highest priority for action.

In all, there are 16 priorities to choose from, ranging from phone and internet access to building more roads, protecting rivers and forests, better health care, etc.

Over 9.7 million people across all nations and age groups and educational and income levels have voted so far. And, shockingly, of the 16 listed priorities for action, “Action taken on climate change” ranks a distant 16th, or last.

The world’s citizens are more concerned about access to paved roads and phones than they are about taking action to combat the greatest threat facing mankind.


Sadly, even citizens of wealthy countries couldn’t care any less than they do about climate change as an issue. In the U.S., for example, in a Gallup poll ranking the levels of concern about 15 pre-selected, randomly-ordered national problems, “Climate Change” again comes in a distant last place.

 

[rsr]

On the other hand, the PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency conducted a survey in 2015 that found that only 43 percent of scientists believe in man-made climate change, which is far from a consensus.

Curious. In response to the question "What fraction of global warming since the mid-20th century can be attributed to human induced in atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations, 49.3 percent replied it accounted for 75 percent or more and 16.6 percent said half to three-quarters. Only 5.2 percent said between a quarter and a half, and 6.5 percent zero to a quarter.

 

[carpro]

And then there was "climategate", when the UN's main mouthpieces for "global warming" got caught cooking the books. Too many "flaws" in their methodology to keep track of, so they just changed the numbers to match their narrative and changed the name. So now we have...drum roll..."climate change", because their phony numbers could not substantiate the "warming" they had been lying about for years.

And the UN could see those trillions of US dollars coming back to them once again.

And we have what would normally be considered smart people buying into their scam once again.

One lie on top of the other. The money is finally in sight and they have their first billion of our bucks, courtesy of you know who.

Then along came Donald Trump, and they can see our trillions of dollars slipping from their grasps.

They won't go down without a fight. Too much money is at stake. So the lies will continue, and the gullible will swallow whatever the lying leftist global cabal puts out, as usual.

Here at BB, we see a microcosm of the gullible every day. Tools of the left.

 

[Gold Dragon]

It's at least as credible as the ones you quoted.


The left likes to claim that 97 percent of scientists support the concept of man-made climate change. It's likely closer to 43 percent. The 97 percent myth stems from a variety of flawed studies, as the Daily Wire explained here. On the other hand, the PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency conducted a survey in 2015 that found that only 43 percent of scientists believe in man-made climate change, which is far from a consensus.


http://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/fil...ence-survey-questions-and-responses_01731.pdf


CLIMATE SCIENCE SURVEY
Questions and Responses
Bart Strengers, Bart Verheggen

___________________________________________________________

Blogger John Cook determined in 2013 that 97 percent of "abstracts of peer-reviewed papers" believed that "human activity is responsible for some warming," but a more exhaustive study of Cook's work determined that only 0.3 percent of the 11,944 papers reviewed by Cook concluded that "human activity is causing most of the current warming."


.03% That's some consensus.

That 43% is probably too high as most of those scientists must have been paid off by that massive green energy lobby representing those shady billionaire green energy ceos all over Forbes lists. No wonder all these journalists and scientists are living the life in their private jets. The democrats are paying them all over the world to maintain this massive conspiracy that involves most of the western world. Those sneaky democrats.

 

[Gold Dragon]

Here at BB, we see a microcosm of the gullible every day. Tools of the left.

Good thing we have you to save us from our stupidity. You really should go on tv, or even better .... twitter.

 

[Happy]

Have you seen Google timelapse? 40 years of satellite photos of the entire globe at almost every scale you can get on google earth. I know they have powerful computers at google but what is the advantage of using all that power to doctor photos for some leftist conspiracy?

Photos are "doctored" to reveal an image in a form people want to see.

NASA does it. Google earth does it. Magazines do it. Photographers do it. Individuals do it.

The advantage is; it sells.

 

[Happy]

That 43% is probably too high as most of those scientists must have been paid off by that massive green energy lobby representing those shady billionaire green energy ceos all over Forbes lists. No wonder all these journalists and scientists are living the life in their private jets. The democrats are paying them all over the world to maintain this massive conspiracy that involves most of the western world. Those sneaky democrats.

Bottom Line ~ In America the JOB of the government is to PRESERVE the citizens LIBERTY. PERIOD.

Bottom Line ~ Global Warming is an irrelevant issue. The PLANET ~ The WEATHER is controlled BY God.

Bottom Line ~

Gen.8

1. [22] While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.

 

[Gold Dragon]

Photos are "doctored" to reveal an image in a form people want to see.

NASA does it. Google earth does it. Magazines do it. Photographers do it. Individuals do it.

The advantage is; it sells.

Totally, paying for doctored images to reinforce the global warming conspiracy is the biggest market on the dark web. Google can't produce them fast enough there is so much demand. Those tens of thousands of photos on Google earth to perpetuate the New World Order run by the UN must cost a ton of man hours to make it look so realistic. Of course you need to make it look consistent with all the other doctored photos out there. But it is so worth it. Do you know what you get for one of those images on ebay!! Everyone wants a piece. Show me the money!

Of course anyone with a brain would know that only photos of the earth found on sites that deny global warming are real and that everything else must be a doctored photo to reinforce a preconceived notion of the world. Those global warming sheep are so gullible.

 

[carpro]

Google is a non issue. Period.

 

[Happy]

Totally, paying for doctored images to reinforce the global warming conspiracy is the biggest market on the dark web. Google can't produce them fast enough there is so much demand. Those tens of thousands of photos on Google earth to perpetuate the New World Order run by the UN must cost a ton of man hours to make it look so realistic. Of course you need to make it look consistent with all the other doctored photos out there. But it is so worth it. Do you know what you get for one of those images on ebay!! Everyone wants a piece. Show me the money!

Of course anyone with a brain would know that only photos of the earth found on sites that deny global warming are real and that everything else must be a doctored photo to reinforce a preconceived notion of the world. Those global warming sheep are so gullible.

There are applications that click, click doctor photos. People should be well aware that technology available to the public is in effect long before the public has access.

 

[Gold Dragon]

There are applications that click, click doctor photos. People should be well aware that technology available to the public is in effect long before the public has access.

Yeah everybody has photoshop. Just click the global warming filter and you can make hundreds of photos look like global warming happens. It also autosyncs with every other photo on the web of that geolocation. The technology is so easy to use these days.

 

[Gold Dragon]

Google is a non issue. Period.

Perpetrator #1. Or was that BBC. Or maybe NASA. It is so hard to keep up. You should make a poll people can vote on. Make sure it is published on a global warming skeptic website or we wouldn't know if it was true or not. Those are the only site that could never be corrupted by those evil lefties. Their security and professionalism are AWESOME! Trust me.

 

[Happy]

Yeah everybody has photoshop. Just click the global warming filter and you can make hundreds of photos look like global warming happens. It also autosyncs with every other photo on the web of that geolocation. The technology is so easy to use these days.

Yep ~ and beyond space photos.... I would lean toward, "Hollywood" has bolstered many females careers with "doctored" imagining.

 

[Lewis]

We frequently read that, “the vast majority of climate scientists agree that....
In reality, one should be careful about giving too much weight to the majority opinions of scientists on any given topic at any given time. Science generally advances through revolution of ideas, not by popular opinion.

As University of London professor emeritus Philip Stott has said: "The
fundamental point has always been this. Climate change is governed by
hundreds of factors, or variables, and the very idea that we can manage
climate change predictably by understanding and manipulating at the margins one politically selected factor (CO2), is as misguided as it gets...It’s
scientific nonsense."