Trump supporters post fake photos of huge crowds at Phoenix rally - as real images show room half-em

[Crabtownboy]

You missed the point. Totally missed it. 10 feet from the ball.

She nailed it!

 

[Reynolds]

No, only calling it as it is.To take scripture so out of context and state it is liberal. That you did.

As I said scripture says David was a man after God's own heart. Once he realized he had sinned he repented and did not commit that sin again. Are you saying that fits Trump also?

How did I take scripture out of context? I did not quote scripture. I asked you a few simple questions?
Did God use David only when David acted righteously?

 

[Reynolds]

If quoting Scripture is being 10 feet from the ball, the ball is in the wrong spot. I'll stick with Scripture while you have fun with the ball.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

You missed the point and still miss it. David was definitely a man after God's own heart. That is why I asked what God called David. If you read completely(from the beginning) and think, it will click.

 

[blessedwife318]

You missed the point and still miss it. David was definitely a man after God's own heart. That is why I asked what God called David. If you read completely(from the beginning) and think, it will click.

You did not ask what God called David you said "What would make you think an adulterous murder was a man after God's own heart?"
I answered the Bible is what "makes me think" and you are under the impression that the Bible is 10 feet away from the point. I stand by the fact that if the point is 10 feet away from the Bible, the point is in the wrong spot.

Feel free to stay by your point, I'll stay with the Bible.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

 

[HankD]

No, only calling it as it is.To take scripture so out of context and state it is liberal. That you did.

As I said scripture says David was a man after God's own heart. Once he realized he had sinned he repented and did not commit that sin again. Are you saying that fits Trump also?

Of what sins do you judge President Trump worthy of condemnation?

HankD

 

[Reynolds]

You did not ask what God called David you said "What would make you think an adulterous murder was a man after God's own heart?"
I answered the Bible is what "makes me think" and you are under the impression that the Bible is 10 feet away from the point. I stand by the fact that if the point is 10 feet away from the Bible, the point is in the wrong spot.

Feel free to stay by your point, I'll stay with the Bible.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

You did not read back far enough. Go back to the beginning please.

 

[blessedwife318]

You did not read back far enough. Go back to the beginning please.

I saw post 8. But that doesn't change the fact that you asked the question of what makes us think that David was a man after God's own heart in post 11. The answer to your question in post 11 is the Bible Tells Us So.

I have no desire in getting involved in your discussion that prompted your question in Post 8, that is why I'm only answering the question about David that you asked in Post 11. I think he is a man after God's own heart because that is what God's word says about him. I'm always going to stay with what the Bible says, even if you think the point is somewhere else.

 

[Reynolds]

I saw post 8. But that doesn't change the fact that you asked the question of what makes us think that David was a man after God's own heart in post 11. The answer to your question in post 11 is the Bible Tells Us So.

I have no desire in getting involved in your discussion that prompted your question in Post 8, that is why I'm only answering the question about David that you asked in Post 11. I think he is a man after God's own heart because that is what God's word says about him. I'm always going to stay with what the Bible says, even if you think the point is somewhere else.

Post 11 is a continuation of the context set in 8. That is not real difficult to figure out. The point is we do not know what God saw in David that made a man who committed adultery and murder a "man after God's own heart." Likewise we can not say what God sees or does not see on Trump. Only God knows that.
That is not hard to figure out, even in the Vegas heat.

 

[blessedwife318]

Post 11 is a continuation of the context set in 8. That is not real difficult to figure out. The point is we do not know what God saw in David that made a man who committed adultery and murder a "man after God's own heart." Likewise we can not say what God sees or does not see on Trump. Only God knows that.
That is not hard to figure out, even in the Vegas heat.

The point is that the Bible tells us that David is a man after God's own heart. We do know what God saw in David, He saw that David was a man after His own heart. Because the Bible Says so. It really is not that difficult to figure out when the Bible spells it out so plainly. You keep trying to defend your point 10 feet away from the Bible, but I'm going to stick with what the Bible tells us, especially on this issue because its very clear, that David was a man after God's own heart.

 

[Reynolds]

The point is that the Bible tells us that David is a man after God's own heart. We do know what God saw in David, He saw that David was a man after His own heart. Because the Bible Says so. It really is not that difficult to figure out when the Bible spells it out so plainly. You keep trying to defend your point 10 feet away from the Bible, but I'm going to stick with what the Bible tells us, especially on this issue because its very clear, that David was a man after God's own heart.

You still don't get it.

 

[blessedwife318]

You still don't get it.

You don't get it, I'm not going to leave the authority of Scripture to move 10 feet to your point.
I've told you time and time again why I think that David was a man after God's own heart since you asked what makes anyone think that. If you don't like the answer that is not my problem.

 

[righteousdude2]

Donald Trump supporters have been sharing fake photos of huge crowds at the US President's Phoenix rally on social media, following claims the event failed to draw big numbers.

Images showing thousands of people lining the streets in Arizona were widely shared by Republicans and the leader's core base.

But the photos were quickly debunked as fake. They actually showed an aerial view of crowds that had turned out for a championship parade for the Cleveland Cavaliers basketball team.



Trump supporters post fake photos of huge crowds at Phoenix rally - as real images show room half-empty

There is "fake news" and you sir have moved into the realm of "FAKE POSTS?!"

If you can prove this, then do it now!​

 

[rsr]

Better not tell him that 40 million watched Obama's Afghanistan speech in 2009 and only 28 million watched Trump on Monday..

Hard to believe. You would think millions would sit down with their popcorn and watch eagerly to see what unexpected utterances would be propounded.

Or it could be that Trump fatigue is setting in. He seems to be running out of memes and has to keep relying on the same old schtick.

 

[righteousdude2]

Hard to believe. You would think millions would sit down with their popcorn and watch eagerly to see what unexpected utterances would be propounded.

Or it could be that Trump fatigue is setting in. He seems to be running out of memes and has to keep relying on the same old schtick.

"Huh?"​

 

[InTheLight]

Hard to believe. You would think millions would sit down with their popcorn and watch eagerly to see what unexpected utterances would be propounded.

Or it could be that Trump fatigue is setting in. He seems to be running out of memes and has to keep relying on the same old schtick.

Maybe have another rally with pre-screened attendees to stroke his ego.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

[rsr]

He could draw a crowd of three people and Tweet it was 15,000 and probably believe he's right.

He doesn't need to assemble pre-screened attendees anymore; he can just call a cabinet meeting.

 

[righteousdude2]

He could draw a crowd of three people and Tweet it was 15,000 and probably believe he's right.

He doesn't need to assemble pre-screened attendees anymore; he can just call a cabinet meeting.

If you dislike Trump, that is your cross to bear. But why speak in riddles? Just come out and say, "I hate the man."

 

[LowOiL]

Maybe have another rally with pre-screened attendees to stroke his ego.

There was an article (see if I can find it) about leftist going online to order tickets to Trump's event but not planning to attend. Just to try to influence crowd size (and estimations I imagine). Again, I have no dog in this fight, just reporting, you decide.

Crowd Shrinkage? Many Activists Registering for Trump Rally but Won't Attend

 

[Alcott]

Interestingly, David did something similar to the accusations against Trump when, in his old age, he had a virgin brought to him to sleep with like his teddy bear, it might be said [II Kings 1:1-4]. If Trump does, or will do, this, he is in David's category in this way-- right?

 

[Crabtownboy]

If you dislike Trump, that is your cross to bear. But why speak in riddles? Just come out and say, "I hate the man."

I pity the man. He is immoral and evil and a chronic liar.