Protestant
Well-Known Member
That's incorrect. As has been pointed out many times, we have consistently supported a HIGHER, not lower, view of God's Sovereignty than our Calvinistic brethren, and I think AW Tozer explains exactly why that is:
"God sovereignly decreed that man should be free to exercise moral choice, and man from the beginning has fulfilled that decree by making his choice between good and evil. When he chooses to do evil, he does not thereby countervail the sovereign will of God but fulfills it, inasmuch as the eternal decree decided not which choice the man should make but that he should be free to make it. If in His absolute freedom God has willed to give man limited freedom, who is there to stay His hand or say, 'What doest thou?' Man’s will is free because God is sovereign. A God less than sovereign could not bestow moral freedom upon His creatures. He would be afraid to do so." - A.W. Tozer, The Knowledge of the Holy: The Attributes of God
Only Pelagians believe theirs is a HIGHER view of God.
Their view has been condemned by both Church councils and Christian Apologists since it was introduced in the 5th century by the very religious, but very lost, British monk.
"Pelagianism is the belief that original sin did not taint human nature and that mortal will is still capable of choosing good or evil without special Divine aid." (Article: Pelagianism; Wikipedia)
I quote Pelagius:
"It was because God wished to bestow on the rational creature the gift of
doing good of his own free will and the capacity to exercise free choice, by
implanting in man the possibility of choosing either alternative...he could do
either quite naturally and then bend his will in the other direction too. He
could not claim to possess the good of his own volition, unless he was the
kind of creature that could also have possessed evil. Our most excellent
creator wished us to be able to do either but actually to do only one, that is,
good, which he also commanded, giving us the capacity to do evil only so
that we might do His will by exercising our own. That being so, this very
capacity to do evil is also good - good, I say, because it makes the good
part better by making it voluntary and independent, not bound by necessity
but free to decide for itself."
(Source: Pelagianism, Wikipedia: 'The Letters of Pelagius and His followers'; Editor: Professor B.R. Rees; Boydell & Brewer, 1991; p. 38)
You and Tozer are most definitely followers of the heretic Pelagius.