Types of Calvinists

Hogwash

The only person I have seen use this word is you.

Come now...tell us. You made up the word right?

 

It is not a waste of time at all..as we soon shall see.

 

Stop accusing me of what I told you came from Calvinist. You just ache for trouble.

 

Jauthor001;
Quote:
Brother Bob
God does not have to go back in time. He sees all at once. He is already there, He is already here, He is already in the end for He is everlasting to everlasting, The beginning and the end. He is my all and all. Trying to compare God with the time of man is foolish. If we start saying God in time travel then He would not be a timeless God.
well bob...

This does not happen very often with us. But we are together on this one.

This is what James said was silly and He agreed with it before. lol

God is timeless when He steps out of His creation. Working with Man (creation) He does use Time, for this is how man relates...thus..the same yesterday, today and tomorrow.

Someday, we too will not need time. May it be today.

oops, I aready posted, excuse

Oh, Gollie Blammo, we better watch out now!

 

Not nasty....

You need to make a point that has not yet been debunked 100 times. One will close you down one week on a point, and then you pop back up posting the same old stuff that has been debunked many times...by many folks and act as if no one has said anything. Thus...get real.

 

Refresh my mind because its just not happening james.

I see through you more all the time James. You don't have an answer so you ask another question. :laugh:

 

Yeah...good one. Now go back and look and READ for the 1st time what I said was silly.

....it was the "per-choosen" that I said you made up.

still not reading Bob? Trying to shut down another thread Bob? How many is this for you Bob? I bet you have the record. What are you sacred of? Why not just sick to the truth of Gods word.

Until you can show you do read others post...this is a wate of time to debate with you, for everything must be gone over many times.

So...untill that time...i'lll just pass over your post.

 

James - I realize this was not addressed to me. However, I can't help but respond. Just because you think you won the debate before, doesn't mean you did. Brother Bob, Webdog, and myself, to name a few, have not changed our minds based on your arguments. Half the time you threaten, "stick around, big answers are on the way", then we wait and wait, and what you finally post is nothing but a bunch of off-point rambling that has little to do with anything. I want you to know, my mind is open, if you really have any compelling arguments, from Scripture, I can be convinced. So far the only compelling arguments I have heard have been from Npetreley. So ramble on if you wish, but, if you want to debunk anything Brother Bob has said, you will have to try much harder.

 

Not a response. Quoted for my own benefit.

 

I'm so glad someone else sees this, including the primary source of the vitriol that shuts down threads.

 

I want to add...before we go to the last word...for this will comeup later

proorizo ....to predetermine, decide beforehand
comes from 2 words...

pro which is a a primary preposition...always meaning before

and

orizo which means... define, to mark out the boundaries or limits ... to determine, appoint


It should be noted...orizo comes from orion which means boundaries

 

Point noted...lets move on

 

You should be man enough to take your part in shutting down a thread but why does it not surprise me that you are not. Best I remember there were several called down and several posts edited. I got hot under the collar and will stand up and tell anyone who want to know, including all the moderators, you and anyone else who might be interested. It don't make me proud to get angry but it does happen when dealing with someone with your personality. peace again James.

 

You have no idea how many times you misspell. I have never brought it to your attention for it is not considered to be very nice but I see that has no bounds on you. So go to it James and if you don't want to post to me then don't. I have told you before I tell you again. You lost the argument is why you don't want to debate me. You know you cannot win the debate with Scriptures. So, James takes his ball and goes home. Shoot, now we don't have a ball to bounce around.

 

Hey npet; we called them tattle tale in school. :laugh:

I saved the entire post for my own benefit npet;

Context is everything you know npet;

We used to have a name for tattle tales and took them out behind the schoolhouse at the end of the day and they forgot a lot. This shows everyone just how childish some are on here playing school games. "I gonna tell teacher on you". :laugh:

 

Now one more word before we get to the context…


B]Proginosko[/B]

The same greek writer say...
Proginosko….to foreknow….of those whom God elected to salvation…. to predestinate

Not the same as the word Prognosis…. Foreknowledge forethought, pre-arrangement

Used in the following verses.
Each time they seem to agree with the greek writers.

Now one meaning can be a simple knowing before hand. And if you think this is the meaning we will work with it. Take your pick.

But most read in context that this indeed is election. Do you agree with the greek that this means election? Also...if so...who is the subject of the election? And...when did this election take place?

 

proginosko prog-in-oce'-ko from 4253 and 1097; to know beforehand, i.e. foresee:--foreknow (ordain), know (before
(of those whom God elected to salvation…. to predestinate
Not in the definition).

. prognosis prog'-no-sis from 4267; forethought:--foreknowledge.

(This one pretty well right)

Not hard when you know that God don't have to deal with time.:thumbs:

 

The bold type above says it all. I agree!!!!!

 

Yes..the sad thing....and much to your dismay..prognosis is not used in the text.

yet proginosko..."of those whom God elected to salvation" is in the text.

Check out the greek Bob..don't take my word for it.

Thus...

RED LETTERS ADDED BY BOB

Is you added to Gods Word.

 

post deleted