saturneptune
New Member
For Calvinists, is it possible for an unelect person to desire salvation? It is just a question. Please do not let this degenerate into a Calvin-free will debate.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Desiring salvation does not equal desiring God.For Calvinists, is it possible for an unelect person to desire salvation? It is just a question. Please do not let this degenerate into a Calvin-free will debate.
Maybe the correct phrase would have been can a person desire Jesus and be unelected? I think we are all well aware of what the Gospel is.Desiring salvation does not equal desiring God.
Rich young ruler is one who desired salvation (and wealth) but did not desire Jesus enough to follow him amongst all else. The gospel is not getting heaven but getting Jesus. He is the goal. Anything less is not the gospel!
Maybe the correct phrase would have been can a person desire Jesus and be unelected? I think we are all well aware of what the Gospel is.
The reason I did not address the question to free willers is because if we have the ability to choose, there is no elect or unelect in the sense of predestination, only foreknowledge.Well he is on a good road to the Grace of God. Probably why he or she is on it anyway.
The reason I did not address the question to free willers is because if we have the ability to choose, there is no elect or unelect in the sense of predestination, only foreknowledge.
I love that verse. In fact, it comes to mind every time I gaze across the night sky with my telescope. Our minds cannot beging to comprehend the glory, majesty, love, and every other concept we can think of about the Lord, and no doubt some we cannot think of.To be honest it's beyond me as Romans states 11:33
"Concerning the rich young ruler of whom it is said Christ "loved him" (Mark 10:21), we fully believe that he was one of God's elect and was "saved" sometime after his interview with our Lord. . . . It is written, "Him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out," and this man certainly did "come" to Him." —Arthur Walkington Pink, The Sovereignty of God
I love that verse. In fact, it comes to mind every time I gaze across the night sky with my telescope. Our minds cannot beging to comprehend the glory, majesty, love, and every other concept we can think of about the Lord, and no doubt some we cannot think of.
Also, in relation to this thread is that God has got everything worked out regardless of what we think about it.
I don't mean to offend there, but that is a huge distinction with a major difference. And honestly, we do not all have the same understanding of what the gospel is.Maybe the correct phrase would have been can a person desire Jesus and be unelected? I think we are all well aware of what the Gospel is.
In the Calvinist model, the non-elect will not come to God because they will not be drawn to Him. So, in that model, the non-elect will not come to Him to be saved.
I see it that they will not come because they reject the truth, and have traded it for lies.
Suppose you witness to a non-elect, they accept Jesus but it won't count. They are bound for hell anyway, according to Calvin.
That's what winds me up most about calvinisim, it's so clinical and jumps so far ahead when the Gospel is so live and active at the moment, it stifles evangelism.
If you really knew the system of Calvinism, then by the very fact that they are not elect means that (1) Jesus didn't accept him (the real issue) & (2) that person would never "accept" Jesus (even an impotent one who needs acceptance).Suppose you witness to a non-elect, they accept Jesus but it won't count. They are bound for hell anyway, according to Calvin.
Suppose you witness to a non-elect, they accept Jesus but it won't count. They are bound for hell anyway, according to Calvin.