NewCovenantBaptist
New Member
That's not interesting at all, it's just error.
And yet, the only verse you cited with the word return was Acts 1:12 which wasn't even referring to Jesus.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That's not interesting at all, it's just error.
Save that the scriptures indicate that the resurrection of the saints would have already happened before this event, so when was the Second Coming and the Church members all glorified?http://www.preteristarchive.com/BibleStudies/Bible_NT/Peter_Second/2peter_03-10.html
John Owen
"On this foundation I affirm that the heavens and earth here intended in this prophecy of Peter, the coming of the Lord, the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men, mentioned in the destruction of that heaven and earth, do all of them relate, not to the last and final judgment of the world, but to that utter desolation and destruction that was to be made of the Judaical church and state; for which I shall offer these two reasons, of many that might be insisted on from the text:-
'(1.) Because whatever is here mentioned was to have its peculiar influence on the men of that generation. He speaks of that wherein both the profane scoffers and those scoffed at were concerned, and that as Jews, some of them believing, others opposing, the faith. Now there was no particular concernment of that generation, nor in that sin, nor in that scoffing, as to the day of judgment in general ; but there was a peculiar relief for the one and a peculiar dread for the other at hand, in the destruction of the Jewish nation ; and, besides, an ample testimony both to the one and the other of the power and dominion of the Lord Jesus Christ, which was the thing in question between them.
'(2.) Peter tells them, that after the destruction and judgment that he speaks of (vers. 7-13), " We, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth,' etc. They had this expectation. But what is that promise? Where may we find it? Why, we have it in the very words and letter, Isa. lxv. 17. Now, when shall this be that God shall create these new heavens and new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness? Saith Peter, " It shall be after the coming of the Lord, after that judgment and destruction of ungodly men, who obey not the gospel, that I foretell." But now it is evident from this place of Isaiah, with chap. lxvi. 21, 22, that this is a prophecy of Gospel times only; and that the planting of these new heavens is nothing but the creation of Gospel ordinances to endure for ever. The same thing is so expressed Heb. xii. 26-28.
First, There is the foundation of the apostle's inference and exhortation, seeing that all these things, however precious they seem, or what value soever any put upon them, shall be dissolved, that is, destroyed; and that in that dreadful and fearful manner before mentioned, in a day of judgment, wrath, and vengeance, by fire and sword; let others mock at the threats of Christ's coming: He will come- He will not tarry; and then the heavens and earth that God Himself planted, -the sun, moon, and stars of the Judaical polity and church, -the whole old world of worship and worshippers, that stand out in their obstinancy against the Lord Christ, shall be sensibly dissolved and destroyed: this we know shall be the end of these things, and that shortly."* (John Owen on Second Peter)
John Lightfoot
"The destruction of Jerusalem is phrased in Scripture as the destruction of the whole world; and Christ's coming to her in judgment, as his coming to the last judgment.* Therefore, those dreadful things, spoken of in Matt. 24:29,30 and 31, are but borrowed expressions, to set forth the terms of that judgment the more.. v.30 - "then shall they see" - not any visible appearance of Christ, or of the cross, in the clouds (as some have imagined); but, whereas* Jews would not own Christ before for the Son of Man, or for the Messias, then by the vengeance that he should execute upon them, they and all the world should see an evident sign, and it was so.* This, therefore, is called "his coming," and his coming in his kingdom." [A Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, ed. Rev. John Rogers Pitman (London: J.F. Dove, 1825), p.141]
"That the destruction of Jerusalem and the whole Jewish state is described as if the whole frame of the world were to be dissolved. Nor is it strange, when God destroyed his habitation and city, places once so dear to him, with so direful and sad an overthrow; his own people, whom he accounted of as much or more than the whole world beside, by so dreadful and amazing plagues. Matt. 24:29,30, 'The sun shall be darkened &c. Then shall appear the 'sign of the Son of man,' &c; which yet are said to fall out within that generation, ver. 34. 2 Pet. 3:10, 'The heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat,' &c. Compare with this Deut. 32:22, Heb. 12:26: and observe that by elements are understood the Mosaic elements, Gal 4:9, Coloss. 2:20: and you will not doubt that St. Peter speaks only of the conflagration of Jerusalem, the destruction of the nation, and the abolishing the dispensation of Moses" (vol. 3, p. 452).
"(Peter, in the second epistle,) sets forth the destruction of that cursed Nation and their City in those terms that Christ had done, Matt. 24. and that the Scripture doth elsewhere, Deut. 32.22,23.24. Jer. 4.23. namely as the destruction of the whole world, The heavens passing away, the elements melting, and the earth burnt up, &c.* And accordingly speaks of a new heaven and a new earth, from Isa. 65.17. a new state of the Church under the Gospel among the Gentiles, when this old world of the Jews state should be dissolved." (Works, Vol. I., p. 338.)
And yet, the only verse you cited with the word return was Acts 1:12 which wasn't even referring to Jesus.
And I am going to have to forego the urge to keep going..
Acts 1:11b (NIV). 'This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen Him go into heaven.' The word translated 'come back' in the NIV is erchomai, which has the basic meaning of 'come' or 'go' but according to Liddell & Scott can also mean 'come back' or 'return,' the latter meaning being required by the context of Acts 1:11b.You should probably keep going, because you haven't posted a verse yet which has the word return in it, except, as I said, the curious example of Acts 1:12 which isn't talking about Jesus.
You should probably keep going, because you haven't posted a verse yet which has the word return in it, except, as I said, the curious example of Acts 1:12 which isn't talking about Jesus.
Scripture very clearly shows the Return of Christ.
2 Peter 3:7-13 (HCSB)
7 But by the same word, the present heavens and earth are stored up for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.
8 Dear friends, don’t let this one thing escape you: With the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day.
9 The Lord does not delay His promise, as some understand delay, but is patient with you, not wanting any to perish but all to come to repentance.
10 But the Day of the Lord will come like a thief; on that ⌊day⌋ the heavens will pass away with a loud noise, the elements will burn and be dissolved, and the earth and the works on it will be disclosed.
11 Since all these things are to be destroyed in this way, ⌊it is clear⌋ what sort of people you should be in holy conduct and godliness
12 as you wait for and earnestly desire the coming of the day of God. The heavens will be on fire and be dissolved because of it, and the elements will melt with the heat.
13 But based on His promise, we wait for the new heavens and a new earth, where righteousness will dwell.
Has the promise in verse 9 and then again in verse 13 been fulfilled? If so, when?
There are Scriptures which talk about Christ coming. But, I've yet to locate any which say He'll "return".
Thus why I asked for your help, and you can't seem to find any either.
So, I recommend the Church dispense with this verbiage.
2 Peter 3:7-13 (HCSB)
7 But by the same word, the present heavens and earth are stored up for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.
8 Dear friends, don’t let this one thing escape you: With the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day.
9 The Lord does not delay His promise, as some understand delay, but is patient with you, not wanting any to perish but all to come to repentance.
10 But the Day of the Lord will come like a thief; on that ⌊day⌋ the heavens will pass away with a loud noise, the elements will burn and be dissolved, and the earth and the works on it will be disclosed.
11 Since all these things are to be destroyed in this way, ⌊it is clear⌋ what sort of people you should be in holy conduct and godliness
12 as you wait for and earnestly desire the coming of the day of God. The heavens will be on fire and be dissolved because of it, and the elements will melt with the heat.
13 But based on His promise, we wait for the new heavens and a new earth, where righteousness will dwell.
Verse nine likely refers to the remnant of Israel in Romans 11.
Verse 13, the New Heavens and New Earth refers to a new Covenant Kingdom of God. When Jesus mentions "Heaven & Earth" in the gospel of Matthew that refers to Old Covenant theocracy (temple and ethno-state) of Israel.
It's just a basic doctrine of the Bible, NCB, taught in both Old and New Testament Prophecy and teaching.There are Scriptures which talk about Christ coming. But, I've yet to locate any which say He'll "return".
It isn't possible to do an exegetical discussion about the English word "return", since it doesn't appear in the English versions I have consulted (perhaps someone can find a version), in pertinent passages.
The words "come", "come again", and "coming" do appear in relevant passages. And so, those words can be analyzed in their contexts.
What is more, they can be compared to the Old Testament for precedent as to what a "coming" is. That is to say, do variations of the word "come" have theological significance in the unfolding of scripture?
Or, are they generic incidental action words with no deeper meaning?
Also, in the same body, glorified physical one, and all eyes shall see Him, so would has to be a visible, not an invisible returning!Acts 1:11b (NIV). 'This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen Him go into heaven.' The word translated 'come back' in the NIV is erchomai, which has the basic meaning of 'come' or 'go' but according to Liddell & Scott can also mean 'come back' or 'return,' the latter meaning being required by the context of Acts 1:11b.
The "strangers" in this verse might better be translated "sojourners." In 1611 this is what the English word "stranger" meant--not someone the speaker did not know, but someone dwelling in another country.Maybe....but you ignored this part of the passage:
1Pe 1:1 ¶ Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,
Jews are not "Strangers" to Peter. Nor did they specifically (at that time) suffer any "dispersion" similar to what existed prior to the accounts in Ezra or the 70 A.D. fall of Jerusalem.
Really? I mean really?Interesting bit of trivia, the Bible never mentions Christ "returning".
I've yet to locate any which say He'll "return".
After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up."