I understand that you believe that.Except that there is a period of time where Jesus rules here on earth, as all earth worships Him, and then turned over to God the father in the Eternal State!
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I understand that you believe that.Except that there is a period of time where Jesus rules here on earth, as all earth worships Him, and then turned over to God the father in the Eternal State!
Except that there is a period of time where Jesus rules here on earth, as all earth worships Him, and then turned over to God the father in the Eternal State!
You are not a dispensationalist, of course, but this is not enough information to tell if you are Covenant Theology or New Covenant Theology.I believe OT prophecies concerning Israel in the OT are fulfilled by the Church (the remnant of Israel) in the NT, and Jesus is On the throne now ruling like he said he was going to. He came the first time to set up the kingdom, it was not conditional, he did as he was going to do. Israel's rejection did not postpone the the kingdom, it expanded it through the gentiles.
By definition what am I?
And please don't say wrong
I believe OT prophecies concerning Israel in the OT are fulfilled by the Church (the remnant of Israel) in the NT, and Jesus is On the throne now ruling like he said he was going to. He came the first time to set up the kingdom, it was not conditional, he did as he was going to do. Israel's rejection did not postpone the the kingdom, it expanded it through the gentiles.
By definition what am I?
And please don't say wrong
now...if you could find one verse that mentions a literal 1000yrs on earth...The 1000 years would still indicate a literal passage of time where Jesus was reigning on this earth though...
now...if you could find one verse that mentions a literal 1000yrs on earth...
Hello Aged manWhy would there be a rejection of this passage. The context and particulars do not allow it to be other then a future millennium.
1And I saw an angel coming down out of heaven, having the key to the Abyss and holding in his hand a great chain. 2He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil, or Satan, and bound him for a thousand years. 3He threw him into the Abyss, and locked and sealed it over him, to keep him from deceiving the nations anymore until the thousand years were ended. After that, he must be set free for a short time.
4I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony about Jesus and because of the word of God. Theya had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. 5(The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.) This is the first resurrection. 6Blessed and holy are those who share in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years.
Jesus is not ruling at this time.
You are not a dispensationalist, of course, but this is not enough information to tell if you are Covenant Theology or New Covenant Theology.
Why would there be a rejection of this passage. The context and particulars do not allow it to be other then a future millennium.
Hello Aged man
6x 1000yrs is mentioned....John sees these souls of these beheaded persons.....where does it say these beheaded persons were on the earth in this passage? The case is made that this is a heavenly reign...not an earthly one.
"What About Revelation 20?: The Believer's Reign with Christ" by Cornelis P. Venema
Apparently your struggle is taking what Scripture I posted (#126) as something other then future. Therefore, your understanding is limited by the biasOn earth sitting in Jerusalem?
where does that come from?
Apparently your struggle is taking what Scripture I posted (#126) as something other then future. Therefore, your understanding is limited by the bias
”Who rules in heaven?
At what place did God ever extend authority to rule in heaven.
He gives no such authority even to the Son! But says to the Son, “sit here beside me UNTIL I make ...
where does it say the rule is on earth?The last chapters of the revelation give a quick glimpse of the new heaven and earth, and there is only one ruler.
There is only one time the prophecy of the ruling messiah in which believers rule WITH Him is that future millennium.
At no other time in history can such a time be found in which believers literally rule and judge even the angels other than that millennium.
And these Scriptures fit more perfectly the millennium then attempting to have saints and Christ usurping the rule of either the current heaven or the new neaten and earth.agedman,
”
At the ascension;
Dan7
13 I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.
14 And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.
where does it say the rule is on earth?
Rev 2And these Scriptures fit more perfectly the millennium then attempting to have saints and Christ usurping the rule of either the current heaven or the new neaten and earth.
Jesus is not ruling at this time.
18 And Jesus came to them and spake unto them, saying, All authority hath been given unto me in heaven and on earth. Mt 28