• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

What happened to these people?

Status
Not open for further replies.

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
Joe said:
I think you just did.

Notice this Diggn in the Word just shows back up today.

Happens to hold to a similar signature line as SFIC

I wonder if SFIC has THREE BB accounts...
Things that make you go "hmmmmmm"

Sad if it's true, though :tear:

It is odd that DIDW is the only person who couldn't find anything wrong or judgemental about SFIC's posts...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
Diggin in da Word said:
No, I am not a modalist. I already showed what a modalist is, and I ain't one.
"If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck..."
 
Joe, While I do admit to know sfiC and Linda, I am not sfiC. I was a member of sfiC's congregation when he pastored the Church I attend in Greensboro. How do you get our signatures are similar? because we both are against alcohol? That means nothing. I can take you to a Church in Montana that the pastor is against alcohol and preaches vehemently against it. Does not mean I am he.
 

JerryL

New Member
Joe said:
I think you just did.

Notice this Diggn in the Word just shows back up today.

Happens to hold to a similar signature line as SFIC

I wonder if SFIC has THREE BB accounts...
That was my very first thought when DIDW shows up after their ban, and hadn't posted in months.

BTW, Show me where my posts were hateful DIDW.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JerryL

New Member
Diggin in da Word said:
Joe, While I do admit to know sfiC and Linda, I am not sfiC. I was a member of sfiC's congregation when he pastored the Church I attend in Greensboro. How do you get our signatures are similar? because we both are against alcohol? That means nothing. I can take you to a Church in Montana that the pastor is against alcohol and preaches vehemently against it. Does not mean I am he.
I guess they got in touch with you so you could defend them here?
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
webdog said:
Modalism is a direct denial of Christ's deity if you state "thou shalt have no other gods besides Me" doesn't apply to Christ.

Modalism does not deny the deity of Christ. It does create another issue just as large. It denies the Trinity. Some of those who hold to this are "Oneness Pentalcostals" T.D. Jakes is one and denies the trinity. In essence it says that God acts in different forms at different times rather than having three distinct personalities.
 

tinytim

<img src =/tim2.jpg>
I really don't think they are the same...
I have indepth conversations and debates with both of them.. and there are some differences when talking to them...
 
Revmitchell said:
Modalism does not deny the deity of Christ. It does create another issue just as large. It denies the Trinity. Some of those who hold to this are &quot;Oneness Pentalcostals&quot; T.D. Jakes is one and denies the trinity. In essence it says that God acts in different forms at different times rather than having three distinct personalities.
Thank you, RevMitchell. As I stated before and others seem to brush it aside just as they did many of the truths sfiC and LindaR posted, I hold to the doctrine of the trinity. I am not, nor will I ever be, a modalist.
 

Frogman

<img src="http://www.churches.net/churches/fubc/Fr
The Scribe said:
I don't know, but shouldn't he be entitled to his opinion?

There are members who believe in women preachers,evolution, and so on.
That's offensive and not Baptist thinking or Biblical.

AMEN.:thumbs:
 

Frogman

<img src="http://www.churches.net/churches/fubc/Fr
webdog said:
Things that make you go "hmmmmmm"

Sad if it's true, though :tear:

It is odd that DIDW is the only person who couldn't find anything wrong or judgemental about SFIC's posts...

Personally I found less wrong with SCIC;'s posts than those who consistently seemed to bait him. MO

bro. Dallas:wavey:
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
webdog said:
It does when you hold to the fact that "thou shalt have no gods besides Me" doesn't apply to Christ.

I dont see it but if that is what you want to hold on to good luck.
 
Frogman said:
Personally I found less wrong with SCIC;'s posts than those who consistently seemed to bait him. MO

bro. Dallas:wavey:
And now that sfiC is not here to bait, they are trying to bait me. Why use such underhanded tactics?
 

EdSutton

New Member
webdog said:
Can They be separated? We CAN have other gods besides Christ, just not the Father :confused:
SAY WHAT??

"Lucy!! You got some serious 'splainin' to do!!"

[Edited to add, after reading some more posts!] The omission of a question mark gives the above quote an entirely different meaning, from a sentence that does end wihth a question mark. The "smilie" does not suffice to show which you mean, IMO.

Ed
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Palatka51

New Member
Diggin in da Word said:
And now that sfiC is not here to bait, they are trying to bait me. Why use such underhanded tactics?
Curious as to why brethren will act this way isn't it? Folks need to step back and take a breath and count to ten. I personally feel that all views expressed here allow an excellent opportunity to learn. To ban some one because they have a differing view is just not American nor Baptist.

Mel
 

EdSutton

New Member
webdog said:
Modalism is a direct denial of Christ's deity if you state "thou shalt have no other gods besides Me" doesn't apply to Christ.
Okay, I think you have explained a bit better, here, perhaps. I'll follow along and see where the thread goes. But reread the one that got my attention, and see if you might like to perhaps reword it, in a better manner.

Ed
 

Steven2006

New Member
I am sorry to see SFIC go. I didn't interact with him much, I didn't know him, and I didn't always agree with what he said, however unlike many here I never was bother by him. The man was just standing firm for his Godly convictions, and I can respect that and separate it from not agreeing with what is said. In fact there are many things posted here that I find more offensive and with a more unChrist attitude than what read from him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top