"Valid" in the eyes of the State, but not in the eyes of God!But by your argument earlier, regarding justice of the peace, if the state marries a gay couple it must be a valid marriage.
NOTICE: This post is not in support of gay marriage.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
"Valid" in the eyes of the State, but not in the eyes of God!But by your argument earlier, regarding justice of the peace, if the state marries a gay couple it must be a valid marriage.
NOTICE: This post is not in support of gay marriage.
At any event you had no reason to assume such.
You wrote it I never gave you that impression because I never mentioned it. You implied that I must be for it. You said;Not sure what part of, "I did not assume that" is hard to understand...
You wrote it I never gave you that impression because I never mentioned it. You implied that I must be for it. You said;
". By that stance, you must also accept gay marriage as legitimate by the government"
" must also accept it". and you do not see this as assumption? Maybe you should have another cup of coffee.
I do not accept it.
MB
That would not be marriage. It would be a long-term shackup.and if the covenant - as agreed to by both parties was only for ten years?
I've proven my point. You haven't proven yours. It is not logical to assume I approve of anything with out my saying so. I will not answer any more of your post about this.It's not an assumption. It is trying to show you need to make stronger arguments and be careful with words because they mean things. I was pointing to a logical progression when taken to its logical conclusion. You are the one making assumptions, not me.
I've proven my point. You haven't proven yours. It is not logical to assume I approve of anything with out my saying so. I will not answer any more of your post about this.
MB
That would not be marriage. It would be a long-term shackup.
Scripture defines marriage as a lifelong union not to be rent in twain by us.
But who decides what a marriage is?
His is the ONLY view that matters!The creator of marriage, God. He says one man one woman for life.
Or by Elvis in Las Vegas, or a Navy captain etc!No where in the Bible will you ever find that marriage has to be performed by a preacher in a church
MB
That would be a long list. I haven't even read all of it yet LOL!When is a marriage valid?... That's easy, its when you say I do and she hands you the list!... Brother Glen
No where in the Bible will you ever find that marriage has to be performed by a preacher in a church
MB
It's mockery to be married more than once. Not to mention adultery. I've been married for 44 years only because God was in it. If he wasn't it would not of lasted more than a few years.The state issues the marriage license, the church does not. The state also determines who is authorized to perform the ceremony. A notary is authorized in two states to perform the ceremony.
In Maryland, any adult can sign as clergy, as long as the couple who are getting married agree that he is a clergy.
This is a requirement in most states: "Louisiana: Marriage Officiants: Ministers of the gospel or priests of any denomination in regular communion with any religious society may perform marriages."
Who makes this determination that the minister is a minister of the gospel?
Man has put in place many legal requirements to make the ceremony valid in the eyes of the law, none of which makes the marriage valid in God's eyes.
Only the proper relationship between participates and God can do that.
It's mockery to be married more than once.
His is the ONLY view that matters!
but to a person who does not believe in God - the view of God does not matter
The bottom line is that there is Gods Law and mans law.