What a primitive understanding of BaptistI prefer this: simple & beautiful. My idea of Baptist’s!
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
What a primitive understanding of BaptistI prefer this: simple & beautiful. My idea of Baptist’s!
No, as its Rome who denies the real Gospel!And you err terribly in your interpretaion of them alone.
YES!What a primitive understanding of Baptist
Landmark Baptist believe that the Baptist movement can be traced, unbroken, back to the Apostolic age. I disagree with that.Please explain to me your Landmark comment?
Interesting discussion. Baptists are not Protestants. Catholics are Protestants. The RCC protested the 1st century Christian church by adding unbiblical doctrine and non-inspired writings to support their false doctrines.
Catholics dominated western Christianity for a 1000 years through fear, persecution of those who disagreed, and the false doctrine that salvation came only through the church and it’s priests.
The Church established in the 1st century has always existed and re-asserted itself during the reformation period. Thank you Lord Jesus.
peace to you
Then prove your assessmentLandmark Baptist believe that the Baptist movement can be traced, unbroken, back to the Apostolic age. I disagree with that.
Yea, I wasn’t acting all that nice in my responses either so I apologize.EWF:
I would like to apologize for the tone and insensitivity in which I responded to your posts over the last few days. It was uncalled for and I can certainly disagree with your positions without the attitude.
I truly enjoyed listening to the acapella singing in the video and watching the youngster who assisted the worship leader. I attended a Maronite Catholic Church in Utica, New York in which the entire liturgy (except the sermon & announcements) were sung without musical instruments.
I have a question regarding Primitive Baptist fellowships. I learned a long time back that using Wikipedia is often a quick way to be mislead, so I went to various websites of Baptist churches identifying as 'Primitive Baptist'. It seemed-to me the common denominator was Calvinistic teaching, although the use of the word 'Calvinism' was rare. Would I be correct in concluding that Primitive Baptists believe in limited or 'particular' atonement?
Also, if I do a search for Primitive Baptist in Roseburg, Oregon, First Landmark Missionary Baptist church is what pops up. Given the disagreements over missions back when Baptists in southern states began to identify themselves as 'Primitive Baptists', when I attended California Baptist University (back in the Stone Age,) I remember several members of Ministerial Alliance referring to Primitive Baptists as being 'Hardshell' and they were not using it to mean 'pig-headed' but my sense was that they were using it to mean uncompromising. Would that be accurate?
Baptist theology and ecclesiology did not exist in the Apostolic or Patristic age. Credobaptism existed but it was not the center of a larger theology. Do some study on the Patristics and early church history. Recommended reading on this topic is Baptism in the Early Church by H.F. Stander and J.P. Louw as well as Early Christian Doctrine by J.N.D. Kelly.Then prove your assessment
What is the root of Christianity anyway? When did the true Christian church begin & what were the principles used to create it?I agree insofar as Anabaptist groups go. They would certainly be considered Baptists (but most Baptists would not be considered Anabaptist as all Anabaptist sects held other distinctives as well).
My point is that they are Protestant (they belong to the Protestant Movement), which has nothing to do with formerly being Catholic.
Did not the early Church though practice pastors/elders/deacons set us as we do as Baptists. and would have seen salvation as saved by grace alone thru faith alone in Christ, and had believers water baptism?Baptist theology and ecclesiology did not exist in the Apostolic or Patristic age. Credobaptism existed but it was not the center of a larger theology. Do some study on the Patristics and early church history. Recommended reading on this topic is Baptism in the Early Church by H.F. Stander and J.P. Louw as well as Early Christian Doctrine by J.N.D. Kelly.
Well these are distinctive that Baptist’s subscribe to but some prods also have. Baptism though.... I mean Credo (Believers Baptism) is something quite unique. Also a clear preference toward New Testament Christianity I would consider a distinctive.... we don’t have the propensity to be legalistic. Rather we are dependent on scripture for guidance.Did not the early Church though practice pastors/elders/deacons set us as we do as Baptists. and would have seen salvation as saved by grace alone thru faith alone in Christ, and had believers water baptism?
While some Baptists may not identify as Protestant, a good portion of Baptists and Protestants aren't Christians in the first place. Jesus warned, tares would reside in the Church to the end. We'll always have false believers among us
.
Can you prove that historically? see otherwise the nay sayers will endeavor to lump you into a Protestant category.Simple: New Testamemt Christianty has existed before and since the New Testament. Today aka Baptist.