You confuse suro and helko.You have not spoken to the passages I provided to you. What do those passages say about God?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You confuse suro and helko.You have not spoken to the passages I provided to you. What do those passages say about God?
Job had no knowledge that Satan wasNo one argues that humans are unfree to act. What is stated is that those actions are ordained by the Providence of God.
God is not unaware or uninvolved when anything occurs within His creation. There are no accidents. No "oops." No surprise regarding anything. All things within God's creation are upheld by His righteous right hand. This includes what you or I would label good and evil.
It is precisely this issue that Job addresses with His wife when she tells him to curse God and die. Job's response is, should we praise God for good and not for evil? Job understood the Providential actions of God.
Job has no knowledge that he is being attacked by Satan. The statement you reference Job making is not Job speaking as a prophet. We have no evidence his statement is inspired. We know the Bible accurately records the statement, but we have no evidence the statement its self. Is inspired.No one argues that humans are unfree to act. What is stated is that those actions are ordained by the Providence of God.
God is not unaware or uninvolved when anything occurs within His creation. There are no accidents. No "oops." No surprise regarding anything. All things within God's creation are upheld by His righteous right hand. This includes what you or I would label good and evil.
It is precisely this issue that Job addresses with His wife when she tells him to curse God and die. Job's response is, should we praise God for good and not for evil? Job understood the Providential actions of God.
Your in that circle again. Humans are free to act, but they have no choice as to what they do.No one argues that humans are unfree to act. What is stated is that those actions are ordained by the Providence of God.
God is not unaware or uninvolved when anything occurs within His creation. There are no accidents. No "oops." No surprise regarding anything. All things within God's creation are upheld by His righteous right hand. This includes what you or I would label good and evil.
It is precisely this issue that Job addresses with His wife when she tells him to curse God and die. Job's response is, should we praise God for good and not for evil? Job understood the Providential actions of God.
Who cares if Job knew about Satan's actions or not. That's irrelevant. Job expresses remarkable faith and a belief that God ordains both good and bad. Nowhere do we see God rebuke Job for his statement.Job had no knowledge that Satan was
Job has no knowledge that he is being attacked by Satan. The statement you reference Job making is not Job speaking as a prophet. We have no evidence his statement is inspired. We know the Bible accurately records the statement, but we have no evidence the statement its self. Is inspired.
What did I say? It isn't what you claim I say. The circle is in your mind. Open it up to what God is saying, not what you want God to be saying.N
Your in that circle again. Humans are free to act, but they have no choice as to what they do.
Open your own mind up and get off the hamster wheel.What did I say? It isn't what you claim I say. The circle is in your mind. Open it up to what God is saying, not what you want God to be saying.
God's word is not a hamster wheel. It's too bad you have closed your mind to reading and understanding God's word in an attempt to cling to a philosophy of free will not supported by God's word.Open your own mind up and get off the hamster wheel.
Prisons have set boundaries for prisoners. They have cells they reside in. They can walk freely within the confines of that cell, but can not go outside those boundaries set. That's not free.Yes, it is according to the boundaries God set. Do you think Adam had freedom to destroy God? Don't be silly. we know what is biblically meant by freewill. Don't play games, figure it out, God did not do this in secret, He let us know what He has done.
Sorry, makes no sense. you believe they already could not believe from birth. No matter what they seen you believe they could not believe. Thus, God would be blinding the blind. BUT, according to God they could choose to believe so He decided after all their rejection He would seal them in their unbelief by blinding them. Pretty simple.
Yes, it is according to the boundaries God set. Do you think Adam had freedom to destroy God? Don't be silly. we know what is biblically meant by freewill. Don't play games, figure it out, God did not do this in secret, He let us know what He has done.
Notice how man has to have first and last say in their salvation?When did humans become spiritually dead? Was Adam's spirit created dead or did it die at the fall?
Now, actually try this time.
Again,you are saying the same thing over and over. Running in that circle. Calvinism is a doctrine based on mans interpretation of the Word of God.God's word is not a hamster wheel. It's too bad you have closed your mind to reading and understanding God's word in an attempt to cling to a philosophy of free will not supported by God's word.
There is only one way to know God and that is by reading His words. Any attempt to force God into the constraints of a philosophy unsupported by God's word is an attempt to create a small god that we control.
I will gladly circle around the word of God.Again,you are saying the same thing over and over. Running in that circle. Calvinism is a doctrine based on mans interpretation of the Word of God.
When you effectively deal with Jn 3: 16-17 (without adding words to it) we might have something to discuss. The typical response from the Calvinist talking points is not a correct answer. It will earn you a "try again." Who made you the referee anyway?
ALL niews of doctrine are based upon how we understand the scriptures....Again,you are saying the same thing over and over. Running in that circle. Calvinism is a doctrine based on mans interpretation of the Word of God.
When you effectively deal with Jn 3: 16-17 (without adding words to it) we might have something to discuss. The typical response from the Calvinist talking points is not a correct answer. It will earn you a "try again." Who made you the referee anyway?
That has never been in question, by calvinist or arminian.The truth is that the scriptures show to us that as a direct result of the Fall, none if us can get saved apart from God doing that for us!
True, as the larger questions would be whom God intended to save, and how He does that!That has never been in question, by calvinist or arminian.
Adam freely operated within the boundaries God set. That's not free.
The Christ's works were so powerful, if God had not blinded them, they would have believe He was the very Christ, and they would not have crucified Him.
Look at Pharaoh. Pharaoh would have relented to save his own hide, but God was actively hardening his heart because He was going to wipe them off the face of the earth due to their idolatry.
You already validated my position...Free means no restrictions, unencumbered, &c.
You really need to slay your golden calf and burn it on an altar somewhere.
Even though you don't like the term freewill.Adam freely operated within the boundaries God set.
I am still waiting for biblical evidence where man's will is free to go outside the boundary of God's ordained will.You already validated my position...
Even though you don't like the term freewill.