... that's the same mentality of arguement that the KJVOists ...
Again sorry to disappoint you, I'm not a 'KJVOist'. I like the KJV very much though, and has the greatest respect for it, for the one reason that it at least tries to be true to the Greek. You know that Tyndale - whose Translation formed the basis for the KJV - said that may his part in Christ be taken away if he translated one word against his concience.
... the day-of-week doctrine is also a false doctrine. It's not biblically supportable. Like the KJVOists, it is up to YOU to show scriptural proof for your claim, and, lacking scriptural support, you haven't a scriptural leg to stand on, lest you add to scripture. [/QB]
The best way of defense is attack. A fighting dog will bite his own master if interfered with. Yes, maybe the doctrine of the Seventh day-of-week doctrine is a false doctrine, but the Day cannot be false, "for GOD thus concerning (it) spoke" - I shall always remember. And remeber I shall always that God thus concerning the GOSPEL of Jesus Christ, "concerning the Seventh Day spoke". He in fact "spoke" in and through and by Jesus Christ the Living Person and personal Saviour of every Elect: "concerning the Seventh Day". How in particular: As in verses 8 and 10 of Hebrews 4 specifically: through and by and in Jesus Christ in resurrection from the dead, "THUS" referring to "having entered into His Own Rest as God from His", and, "If Jesus had given them rest", then, "THEREFORE there remains (valid) a keeping of the Sabbath Day for the People of God. Jesus BECAME, "Lord of the Sabbath Day indeed" by having risen from the dead. No other way? THAT"S WHY, dear friend, the Church kept on keeping the Sabbath but for this absolutely NEW reason.
That is my "scriptural support" and "leg to stand on as far as the Sabbath is concerned. If you regarded it as "adding to the scriptures", I would not be able to prevent.
Gerhard